Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Example 3.3 shows that the \(M R S\) for the Cobb-Douglas function \\[ U(x, y)=x^{\alpha} y^{\beta} \\] is given by \\[ M R S=\frac{\alpha}{\beta}\left(\frac{y}{x}\right) \\] a. Does this result depend on whether \(\alpha+\beta=1 ?\) Does this sum have any relevance to the theory of choice? b. For commodity bundles for which \(y=x\), how does the \(M R S\) depend on the values of \(\alpha\) and \(\beta ?\) Develop an intuitive explanation of why, if \(\alpha>\beta, M R S>1\) Illustrate your argument with a graph. c. Suppose an individual obtains utility only from amounts of \(x\) and \(y\) that exceed minimal subsistence levels given by \(x_{0}, y_{0} .\) In this case, \\[ U(x, y)=\left(x-x_{0}\right)^{\alpha}\left(y-y_{0}\right)^{\beta} \\] Is this function homothetic? (For a further discussion, see the Extensions to Chapter \(4 .\) )

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: No, the sum of alpha and beta does not affect the MRS calculation directly, as the MRS formula is given by \(\frac{\alpha}{\beta}\left(\frac{y}{x}\right)\), which doesn't involve the sum of alpha and beta. The sum of alpha and beta has relevance to the theory of choice in terms of the returns to scale of the utility function, but not on the MRS calculation.

Step by step solution

01

a) Relevance of the Sum of Alpha and Beta on MRS

To analyze whether the sum of alpha and beta is relevant to the MRS, let's first write the MRS as: \\[ M R S=\frac{\alpha}{\beta}\left(\frac{y}{x}\right) \\] Notice that the sum of alpha and beta doesn't appear in the MRS formula. Therefore, the MRS is not affected by whether the sum of the exponents is equal to 1 or not. The sum of alpha and beta has relevance to the theory of choice in terms of the returns to scale of the utility function. If alpha + beta = 1, the utility function exhibits constant returns to scale, which helps explain the proportionality of consumption choices. However, it doesn't impact the MRS calculation directly.
02

b) MRS Dependence on Alpha and Beta for Equal X and Y

Now, let's analyze the MRS when \(x=y\). We substitute \(y=x\) into the MRS formula: \\[ M R S=\frac{\alpha}{\beta}\left(\frac{x}{x}\right) = \frac{\alpha}{\beta} \\] This shows that the MRS depends on the ratio of alpha and beta when x and y are equal. If \(\alpha > \beta\), then the MRS will be greater than 1. This is because the consumer has a stronger preference for good x than good y. Their utility increases more with additional units of x than y. A graph illustrating this result will show a steeper slope for the indifference curve when \(\alpha > \beta\), indicating a higher MRS.
03

c) Checking Homotheticity with Subsistence Levels

We are given a modified Cobb-Douglas utility function accounting for subsistence levels: \\[ U(x, y)=\left(x-x_{0}\right)^{\alpha}\left(y-y_{0}\right)^{\beta} \\] To check whether this function is homothetic, we must verify if the utility function can be represented as a monotonic transformation of a homogenous function. We can do this by taking the monotonic transformation \(V(x,y) = \ln(U(x,y))\), this gives: \\[ V(x, y) = \alpha \ln(x-x_{0}) + \beta \ln(y-y_{0}) \\] Now, let's check if this function is homogeneous by verifying if \(V(tx,ty) = tV(x,y)\) for any \(t > 0\): \\[ V(tx, ty) = \alpha \ln(t(x-x_{0})) + \beta \ln(t(y-y_{0})) \ne tV(x,y) \\] As seen above, the \(V(tx, ty)\) expression doesn't reduce to the form of \(tV(x,y)\), which means the given Cobb-Douglas utility function with subsistence levels is not homothetic.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The formal study of preferences uses a general vector notation. A bundle of \(n\) commodities is denoted by the vector \(\mathbf{x}=\left(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\right),\) and a preference relation \((>)\) is defined over all potential bundles. The statement \(\mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{2}\) means that bundle \(\mathbf{x}^{1}\) is preferred to bundle \(\mathbf{x}^{2}\). Indifference between two such bundles is denoted by \(\mathbf{x}^{1}=\mathbf{x}^{2}\) The preference relation is "complete" if for any two bundles the individual is able to state either \(\mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{2}, \mathbf{x}^{2}>\mathbf{x}^{1},\) or \(\mathbf{x}^{1}=\mathbf{x}^{2} .\) The relation is "transitive" if \(\mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{2}\) and \(\mathbf{x}^{2}>\mathbf{x}^{3}\) implies that \(\mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{3}\). Finally, a preference relation is "continuous" if for any bundle \(y\) such that \(y>x,\) any bundle suitably close to y will also be preferred to \(\mathbf{x}\). Using these definitions, discuss whether each of the following preference relations is complete, transitive, and continuous. a. Summation preferences: This preference relation assumes one can indeed add apples and oranges. Specifically, $$\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{2} \text { if and only if } \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{1}>\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{2} \text { . If } \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{1}=\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{2} \\ \mathbf{x}^{1} \approx \mathbf{x}^{2} \end{array}$$ b. Lexicographic preferences: In this case the preference relation is organized as a dictionary: If \(x_{1}^{1}>x_{1}^{2}, \mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{2}\) (regardless of the amounts of the other \(n-1\) goods). If \(x_{1}^{1}=x_{1}^{2}\) and \(x_{2}^{1}>x_{2}^{2}, \mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{2}\) (regardless of the amounts of the other \(n-2 \text { goods }) .\) The lexicographic preference relation then continues in this way throughout the entire list of goods. c. Preferences with satiation: For this preference relation there is assumed to be a consumption bundle ( \(\mathbf{x}^{*}\) ) that provides complete "bliss." The ranking of all other bundles is determined by how close they are to \(\mathbf{x}^{*}\). That is, \(\mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{\mathbf{2}}\) if and only if \(\left|\mathbf{x}^{1}-\mathbf{x}^{*}\right|<\left|\mathbf{x}^{2}-\mathbf{x}^{*}\right|\) where \(\left|\mathbf{x}^{1}-\mathbf{x}^{*}\right|=\) \(\sqrt{\left(x_{1}^{i}-x_{1}^{*}\right)^{2}+\left(x_{2}^{i}-x_{2}^{*}\right)^{2}+\cdots+\left(x_{n}^{i}-x_{n}^{*}\right)^{2}}\)

Consider the following utility functions: a. \(U(x, y)=x y\) b. \(U(x, y)=x^{2} y^{2}\) c. \(U(x, y)=\ln x+\ln y\) Show that each of these has a diminishing \(M R S\) but that they exhibit constant, increasing, and decreasing marginal utility, respectively. What do you conclude?

Graph a typical indifference curve for the following utility functions, and determine whether they have convex indifference curves (i.e., whether the \(M R S\) declines as \(x\) increases). a. \(U(x, y)=3 x+y\) \(\mathrm{b}, U(x, y)=\sqrt{x \cdot y}\) \(c_{\cdot} U(x, y)=\sqrt{x}+y\) \(\mathrm{d} . U(x, y)=\sqrt{x^{2}-y^{2}}\) \(\mathrm{e}, U(x, y)=\frac{x y}{x+y}\)

Two goods have independent marginal utilities if \\[ \frac{\partial^{2} U}{\partial y \partial x}=\frac{\partial^{2} U}{\partial x \partial y}=0 \\] Show that if we assume diminishing marginal utility for each good, then any utility function with independent marginal utilities will have a diminishing \(M R S\). Provide an example to show that the converse of this statement is not true.

Consider the function \(U(x, y)=x+\ln y .\) This is a function that is used relatively frequently in economic modeling as it has some useful properties. a. Find the \(M R S\) of the function. Now, interpret the result. b. Confirm that the function is quasi-concave. c. Find the equation for an indifference curve for this function. d. Compare the marginal utility of \(x\) and \(y .\) How do you interpret these functions? How might consumers choose between \(x\) and \(y\) as they try to increase their utility by, for example, consuming more when their income increases? (We will look at this "income effect" in detail in the Chapter 5 problems.) e. Considering how the utility changes as the quantities of the two goods increase, describe some situations where this function might be useful.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free