Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that \(f(x, y)=x y .\) Find the maximum value for \(f\) if \(x\) and \(y\) are constrained to sum to \(1 .\) Solve this problem in two ways: by substitution and by using the Lagrange multiplier method.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The maximum value of the function is \(\frac{1}{4}\).

Step by step solution

01

Solve for one variable in terms of the other using the constraint equation

Since the constraint is \(x + y = 1\), you can solve for \(y\) in terms of \(x\) (or vice versa): \(y = 1-x\).
02

Substitute the expression for \(y\) into the function \(f(x, y)\)

Now substitute the expression for \(y\) from the constraint equation into the function \(f(x, y) = xy\). This gives us the new function \(f(x) = x(1-x)\).
03

Find the derivative of the new function

To find the critical points, we need to take the derivative of the function \(f(x)\): \(f'(x) = (1-x)-x\).
04

Set the derivative to zero and solve for x

Now set \(f'(x)\) to zero and solve for \(x\): \((1-x)-x = 0 \Rightarrow x = \frac{1}{2}\).
05

Substitute the x-value back into the constraint equation to find the corresponding y-value

Using the value of \(x = \frac{1}{2}\) we found and the constraint equation \(y = 1-x\), we can find the corresponding \(y\) value: \(y = 1-\frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{2}\).
06

Find the maximum value of the function

Plug the values of \(x\) and \(y\) we found into the original function \(f(x, y) = xy\) to find the maximum value: \(f(\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{4}\). Method 2: Lagrange Multiplier Method
07

Set up the Lagrangian function

The Lagrangian function is defined as \(L(x, y, \lambda) = f(x, y) - \lambda(g(x, y) - c)\), where \(\lambda\) is the Lagrange multiplier. In this case, \(f(x, y) = xy\), \(g(x, y) = x + y\), and \(c = 1\). So \(L(x, y, \lambda) = xy - \lambda(x + y - 1)\).
08

Find the partial derivatives of the Lagrangian function

Calculate the partial derivatives of the Lagrangian function with respect to \(x\), \(y\), and \(\lambda\): \(\frac{\partial L}{\partial x} = y - \lambda\) \(\frac{\partial L}{\partial y} = x - \lambda\) \(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \lambda} = x + y - 1\)
09

Set the partial derivatives equal to zero and solve the equations

Set the partial derivatives equal to zero: \(\left\{\begin{array}{l} y - \lambda=0\\ x - \lambda=0 \\ x + y - 1=0 \end{array}\right.\) Solve this system of equations to find the values of \(x\), \(y\), and \(\lambda\). Since \(y-\lambda = 0\) and \(x-\lambda = 0\), we know both \(x\) and \(y\) are equal to \(\lambda\). Substitute \(x\) and \(y\) for \(\lambda\) in the third equation to get: \(x+x-1=0 \Rightarrow x = \frac{1}{2}\). Since \(x=y=\lambda\), we also have \(y = \frac{1}{2}\).
10

Find the maximum value of the function

Plug the values of \(x\) and \(y\) we found into the original function \(f(x, y) = xy\) to find the maximum value: \(f(\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{4}\). In both methods, the maximum value of \(f(x, y) = xy\) with the constraint \(x + y = 1\) is \(\frac{1}{4}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Optimization with Constraints
When we attempt to optimize a function subject to a constraint, we're often dealing with a scenario where we want to find the maximum or minimum values of a function within a restricted domain. This typically involves a secondary equation that limits the possible values of the variables we're looking to optimize. A common technique to tackle such problems is the method of substitution, where we use the constraint equation to express one variable in terms of the others and subsequently reduce the number of variables in our function.
In the exercise provided, we're tasked with optimizing the function \( f(x, y) = xy \) under the constraint that the sum of \( x \) and \( y \) equals 1. The constraint \( x + y = 1 \) is utilized to express \( y \) in terms of \( x \), leading to a single-variable function which can then be optimized using standard techniques. By taking this approach, we translate a multivariable problem into a simpler one-dimensional problem, which is sometimes more intuitive to solve.
Partial Derivatives
Partial derivatives are fundamental in the study of multivariable calculus, as they measure how a function changes as one of its variables changes, holding all other variables constant. They play a significant role especially when dealing with functions of multiple variables, such as in the optimization problem where we need to understand the behavior of the function with respect to each variable independently.
To find the maximum value of our function \( f(x, y) = xy \), when applying the Lagrange multiplier method, we calculate the partial derivatives of the Lagrange function \( L(x, y, \lambda) = xy - \lambda(x + y - 1) \). These derivatives represent the rate of change of \( L \) with respect to \( x \), \( y \), and \( \lambda \) – where \( \lambda \) is introduced as a new variable, the Lagrange multiplier. Setting these partial derivatives equal to zero gives us a system of equations whose solutions are critical for finding the maximum value of our original function subject to the constraint.
Critical Points
In the context of calculus, critical points are where the derivative (or gradient) of a function is zero or undefined. These points are essential because they are potential locations where a function may attain maximum or minimum values.
By using the results from taking the partial derivatives in the Lagrange multiplier method and setting them to zero, we are essentially finding the critical points of the extended function that includes the constraint. In our exercise, after finding that both \( x \) and \( y \) equal \( \lambda \), we determine that \( x = y = \frac{1}{2} \) by solving the equations derived from the partial derivatives. By finding these critical points, we are able to locate the specific values for \( x \) and \( y \) that will maximize the function \( f(x, y) = xy \) under the given constraint. The process reveals not only the coordinates of the maximum point but also reaffirms the powerful utility of critical points in solving optimization problems.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Because the expected value concept plays an important role in many economic theories, it may be useful to summarize a few more properties of this statistical measure. Throughout this problem, \(x\) is assumed to be a continuous random variable with PDF \(f(x)\) a. (Jensen's inequality) Suppose that \(g(x)\) is a concave function. Show that \(E[g(x)] \leq g[E(x)] .\) Hint: Construct the tangent to \(g(x)\) at the point \(E(x)\). This tangent will have the form \(c+d x \geq g(x)\) for all values of \(x\) and \(c+d E(x)=g[E(x)],\) where \(c\) and \(d\) are constants. b. Use the procedure from part (a) to show that if \(g(x)\) is a convex function, then \(E[g(x)] \geq g[E(x)]\) c. Suppose \(x\) takes on only non-negative values-that is, \(0 \leq x \leq \infty\). Use integration by parts to show that \\[ E(x)=\int[1-F(x)] d x \\] where \(F(x)\) is the cumulative distribution function for \(x\) \\[ \left[\text { ice, } F(x)=\int_{0}^{x} f(t) d t\right] \\] d. (Markov's inequality) Show that if \(x\) takes on only positive values, then the following inequality holds: \\[ \begin{array}{c} P(x \geq t) \leq \frac{E(x)}{t} \\ \text { Hint: } E(x)=\int_{0}^{\infty} x f(x) d x=\int_{0}^{t} x f(x) d x+\int_{t}^{\infty} x f(x) d x \end{array} \\] e. Consider the PDF \(f(x)=2 x^{-3}\) for \(x \geq 1\) 1\. Show that this is a proper PDF. 2\. Calculate \(F(x)\) for this PDF. 3\. Use the results of part (c) to calculate \(E(x)\) for this \(P D F\) 4\. Show that Markov's incquality holds for this function. f. The concept of conditional expected value is useful in some economic problems. We denote the expected value of \(x\) conditional on the occurrence of some event, \(A\), as \(E(x | A),\) To compute this value we need to know the PDF for \(x \text { given that } A \text { has occurred [denoted by } f(x | A)]\) With this notation, \(E(x | A)=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} x f(x | A) d x .\) Perhaps the easiest way to understand these relationships is with an example. Let \\[ f(x)=\frac{x^{2}}{3} \quad \text { for } \quad-1 \leq x \leq 2 \\] 1\. Show that this is a proper PDF. 2\. Calculate \(E(x)\) 3\. Calculate the probability that \(-1 \leq x \leq 0\) 4\. Consider the event \(0 \leq x \leq 2,\) and call this event \(A\). What is \(f(x | A) ?\) 5\. Calculate \(E(x | A)\) 6\. Explain your results intuitively.

Consider the following constrained maximization problem: \\[ \begin{array}{ll} \text { maximize } & y=x_{1}+5 \ln x_{2} \\ \text { subject to } & k-x_{1}-x_{2}=0 \end{array} \\] where \(k\) is a constant that can be assigned any specific value. a show that if \(k=10,\) this problem can be solved as one involving only equality constraints. b. Show that solving this problem for \(k=4\) requires that \\[ x_{1}=-1 \\] c. If the \(x\) 's in this problem must be non-negative, what is the optimal solution when \(k=4 ?\) (This problem may be solved cither intuitively or using the methods outlined in the chapter.) d. What is the solution for this problem when \(k=20 ?\) What do you conclude by comparing this solution with the solution for part (a)?

Suppose a firm's total revenues depend on the amount produced \((q)\) according to the function \\[ R=70 q-q^{2} \\] Total costs also depend on \(q\) \\[ C=q^{2}+30 q+100 \\] a. What level of output should the firm produce to maximize profits \((R-C) ?\) What will profits be? b. Show that the second-order conditions for a maximum are satisfied at the output level found in part (a). c. Does the solution calculated here obey the "marginal revenue equals marginal cost" rule? Explain.

The height of a ball that is thrown straight up with a certain force is a function of the time ( \(t\) ) from which it is released given by \(f(t)=-0.5 g t^{2}+40 t\) (where \(g\) is a constant determined by gravity). a. How does the value of \(t\) at which the height of the ball is at a maximum depend on the parameter \(g\) ? b. Use your answer to part (a) to describe how maximum height changes as the parameter \(g\) changes. c. Use the envelope theorem to answer part (b) directly. d. On the Earth \(g=32,\) but this value varies somewhat around the globe. If two locations had gravitational constants that differed by \(0.1,\) what would be the difference in the maximum height of a ball tossed in the two places?

Suppose \(f(x, y)=4 x^{2}+3 y^{2}\) a. Calculate the partial derivatives of \(f\) b. Suppose \(f(x, y)=16 .\) Use the implicit function theorem to calculate \(d y / d x\) c. What is the value of \(d y / d x\) if \(x=1, y=2 ?\) d. Graph your results and use it to interpret the results in parts (b) and (c) of this problem.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free