Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose a perfectly competitive industry can produce widgets at a constant marginal cost of \(\$ 10\) per unit. Monopolized marginal costs increase to \(\$ 12\) per unit because \(\$ 2\) per unit must be paid to lobbyists to retain the widget producers' favored position. Suppose the market demand for widgets is given by \\[ Q_{D}=1,000-50 P \\] a. Calculate the perfectly competitive and monopoly outputs and prices. b. Calculate the total loss of consumer surplus from monopolization of widget production. c. Graph your results and explain how they differ from the usual analysis.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The consumer surplus in the perfectly competitive market is $2,500, while in the monopolized market it is $29.64. The total loss of consumer surplus due to monopolization is $2,470.36.

Step by step solution

01

Perfectly Competitive Market Equilibrium

We know that in a perfectly competitive market, price equals marginal cost, and we are given that the constant marginal cost is \(10 per unit. Therefore, price in the perfectly competitive market is \)P = \$10$. Now, to find the corresponding quantity, we can plug this value into the demand equation: \[Q_D = 1,000 - 50P\] Plugging in the price \(P = \$10\): \[Q_D = 1,000 - 50(10) = 1,000 - 500 = 500\] So, in a perfectly competitive market, output is \((Q_D) = 500\) widgets and price is \(P = \$10\).
02

Monopoly Market Equilibrium

For the monopolized market, the marginal cost equation becomes: \(MC = \$12\) since the marginal cost increases due to lobbying expenses. Now we need to find the marginal revenue to determine the monopolized output. To find the marginal revenue, we first need to find the total revenue, which is the product of price and quantity: \[TR = PQ = P(1,000 - 50P)\] Now, we can differentiate this equation with respect to P to obtain marginal revenue: \[MR = \frac{d(TR)}{dP} = 1,000 - 100P\] Next, we will set the marginal cost (\(MC = 12\)) equal to the marginal revenue and solve for price: \[12 = 1,000 - 100P\] \[100P = 988\] \[P = 9.88\] Now, plug this value back into the demand equation to determine the output: \[Q_D = 1,000 - 50(9.88)\] \[Q_D = 1,000 - 494 = 506\] Hence, in a monopolized market, output is \((Q_D) = 506\) widgets and price is \(P = \$9.88\). #b. Calculate the total loss of consumer surplus from monopolization of widget production.#
03

Consumer Surplus Loss Calculation

The consumer surplus is the difference between the maximum price a consumer is willing to pay and the price they actually pay. The consumer surplus loss is the difference in consumer surplus between the perfectly competitive and monopolized markets. For the perfectly competitive market, the consumer surplus is given by the area of the triangle formed by the demand curve and the horizontal line at price \(P = \$10\). The base of this triangle is given by the difference between the maximum demand quantity at \(P = 0\) (\(Q_{max} = 1000\)) and the equilibrium quantity \((Q_D = 500)\): \[Base = Q_{max} - Q_D = 1000 - 500 = 500\] \[Height = Original Price - Equilibrium Price = 10 - 0 = 10\] Now we can calculate the consumer surplus in the perfectly competitive market: \[CS = \frac{1}{2} \times Base \times Height = \frac{1}{2} \times 500 \times 10 = 2,500\] For the monopolized market, the consumer surplus is given by the area of the triangle formed by the demand curve and the horizontal line at price \(P = \$9.88\). The base of this triangle is given by the difference between the maximum demand quantity at \(P = 0\) (\(Q_{max} = 1000\)) and the equilibrium quantity \((Q_D = 506)\): \[Base = Q_{max} - Q_D = 1000 - 506 = 494\] \[Height = Original Price - Monopoly Price = 10 - 9.88 = 0.12\] Now we can calculate the consumer surplus in the monopolized market: \[CS = \frac{1}{2} \times Base \times Height = \frac{1}{2} \times 494 \times 0.12 = 29.64\] Finally, let's find the total loss of consumer surplus from monopolization: \[CS_{loss} = CS_{perfect competition} - CS_{monopoly} = 2,500 - 29.64 = 2,470.36\] Therefore, the total loss of consumer surplus from monopolization of widget production is $2,470.36. #c. Graph your results and explain how they differ from the usual analysis.# Unfortunately, we cannot provide a graph within this text-based format. However, when you draw the graph, you will find some important differences between the two markets: 1. Both the perfectly competitive and monopolized markets have different prices and outputs. 2. In the monopolized market, the price is lower than in the perfectly competitive market due to the increased marginal cost. 3. The consumer surplus losses are much higher in the monopolized market compared to the perfectly competitive market. This differs from the usual analysis where the monopolized market has higher prices and lower output compared to the perfectly competitive market, leading to deadweight loss. In this case, we find a lower price and an increase in output in the monopolized market, due to the increased lobbying costs being included in the marginal cost to uphold their favored position.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose a monopolist produces alkaline batteries that may have various useful lifetimes \((X) .\) Suppose also that consumers' (inverse) demand depends on batteries' lifetimes and quantity (Q) purchased according to the function \\[ P(Q, X)=g(X \cdot Q) \\] where \(g^{\prime} < 0 .\) That is, consumers care only about the product of quantity times lifetime: They are willing to pay equally for many short-lived batteries or few long-lived ones. Assume also that battery costs are given by \\[ C(Q, X)=C(X) Q \\] where \(C^{\prime}(X )> 0 .\) Show that, in this case, the monopoly will opt for the same level of \(X\) as does a competitive industry even though levels of output and prices may differ. Explain your result. Hint: Treat \(X Q\) as a composite commodity.

The taxation of monopoly can sometimes produce results different from those that arise in the competitive case. This problem looks at some of those cases. Most of these can be analyzed by using the inverse elasticity rule (Equation \(14.1)\) a. Consider first an ad valorem tax on the price of a monopoly's good. This tax reduces the net price received by the monopoly from \(P\) to \(P(1-t),\) where \(t\) is the proportional tax rate. Show that, with a linear demand curve and constant marginal cost, the imposition of such a tax causes price to increase by less than the full extent of the tax. b. Suppose that the demand curve in part (a) were a constant elasticity curve. Show that the price would now increase by precisely the full extent of the tax. Explain the difference between these two cases. c. Describe a case where the imposition of an ad valorem \(\operatorname{tax}\) on a monopoly would cause the price to increase by more than the tax. d. A specific tax is a fixed amount per unit of output. If the tax rate is \(\tau\) per unit, total tax collections are \(\tau Q .\) Show that the imposition of a specific tax on a monopoly will reduce output more (and increase price more) than will the imposition of an ad valorem tax that collects the same tax revenue.

Suppose a monopoly market has a demand function in which quantity demanded depends not only on market price ( \(P\) ) but also on the amount of advertising the firm does \((A,\) measured in dollars). The specific form of this function is \\[ Q=(20-P)\left(1+0.1 A-0.01 A^{2}\right) \\] The monopolistic firm's cost function is given by \\[ C=10 Q+15+A \\] a. Suppose there is no advertising \((A=0) .\) What output will the profit- maximizing firm choose? What market price will this yield? What will be the monopoly's profits? b. Now let the firm also choose its optimal level of advertising expenditure. In this situation, what output level will be chosen? What price will this yield? What will the level of advertising be? What are the firm's profits in this case? Hint: This can be worked out most easily by assuming the monopoly chooses the profit-maximizing price rather than quantity.

A monopolist faces a market demand curve given by \\[Q=70-p.\\] a. If the monopolist can produce at constant average and marginal costs of \(A C=M C=6,\) what output level will the monopolist choose to maximize profits? What is the price at this output level? What are the monopolist's profits? b. Assume instead that the monopolist has a cost structure where total costs are described by \\[ C(Q)=0.25 Q^{2}-5 Q+300 \\] With the monopolist facing the same market demand and marginal revenue, what price-quantity combination will be chosen now to maximize profits? What will profits be? c. Assume now that a third cost structure explains the monopolist's position, with total costs given by \\[ C(Q)=0.0133 Q^{3}-5 Q+250 \\] Again, calculate the monopolist's price-quantity combination that maximizes profits. What will profit be? Hint: Set \(M C=M R\) as usual and use the quadratic formula to solve the second-order equation for \(Q\)

In an important recent working paper, M. Fabinger and E. G. Weyl characterize tractable monopoly problems. \(^{18}\) A "tractable" problem satisfies three conditions. First, it must be possible to move back and forth between explicit expressions for inverse and direct demand (invertibility). Second, inverse demand-which can also be interpreted as average revenuemust have the same functional form as marginal revenue, and average cost must have the same functional form as marginal cost (form preservation). Third, the monopolist's first-order condition must be a linear equation (linearity), if not immediately after differentiation, then at least after suitable substitution. The authors show that the broadest possible class of tractable problems has the following functional form for inverse demand and average cost: \\[ \begin{aligned} P(Q) &=a_{0}+a_{1} Q^{-s} \\ A C(Q) &=c_{0}+c_{1} Q^{-s} \end{aligned} \\] where \(a_{0}, a_{1}, c_{0}, c_{1},\) and \(s\) are non-negative constants. a. Solve for the monopoly equilibrium quantity and price given these functional forms. What substitution \(x=f(Q)\) do you need to make the first- order condition linear in \(x ?\) b. Derive the solution in the special case with constant average and marginal cost. c. If one is willing to relax tractability a bit to allow the monopoly's first-order condition to be a quadratic equation (at least after suitable substitution), the authors show that the broadest class of tractable problems then involves the following functional forms: \\[ \begin{aligned} P(Q) &=a_{0}+a_{1} Q^{-s}+a_{2} Q^{s} \\ A C(Q) &=c_{0}+c_{1} Q^{-s}+c_{2} Q^{s} \end{aligned} \\] Solve for the monopoly equilibrium quantity and price. What substitution \(x=f(Q)\) is needed to make the first-order condition quadratic in \(x ?\) d. While slightly complicated, the functional forms in part (c) have the advantage of being flexible enough to allow for U-shaped average cost curves such as drawn in Figure 14.2 in addition to constant, increasing, and decreasing. Demonstrate this by graphing this average cost curve for well- chosen values of \(c_{0}, c_{1}, c_{2}\) to illustrate the various cases. The flexible functional forms in part (c) also allow for realistic demand shapes, for example, one that closely fits the U.S. income distribution (which implicitly takes income to proxy for consumers' willingness to pay). These realistic demand shapes can be used in calibrations to address important policy questions. For example, the text mentioned that, in theory, the welfare effects of monopoly price discrimination can go either way, either being higher or lower than under uniform pricing. Calibrations involving the demand curves from part (c) invariably show that welfare is higher under price discrimination.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free