Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that the demand function for a good has the linear form \(Q=D(P, I)=a+b P+c I\) and the supply function is also of the linear form \(Q=S(P)=d+g P\). a. Calculate equilibrium price and quantity for this market as a function of the parameters \(a, b, c, d,\) and \(g\) and of \(I\) (income), the exogenous shift term for the demand function. b, Use your results from part (a) to calculate the comparative statics derivative \(d P^{*} / d I\) c. Now calculate the same derivative using the comparative statics analysis of supply and demand presented in this chapter. You should be able to show that you get the same results in each case. d. Specify some assumed values for the various parameters of this problem and describe why the derivative \(d P^{*} / d I\) takes the form it does here.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: In this market, as income increases, the equilibrium price increases as well. Specifically, for each one-unit increase in income, the equilibrium price goes up by 1/6 units. This suggests that consumers are willing to pay more for the good as their income increases.

Step by step solution

01

Equate Demand and Supply Functions to find Equilibrium

First, we need to find the equilibrium price and quantity. At equilibrium, the quantity demanded is equal to the quantity supplied. So, we can equate the demand and supply functions: \(Q = D(P, I) = a + bP + cI\) \(Q = S(P) = d + gP\) Now, equating demand and supply functions: \(a + bP + cI = d + gP\)
02

Solve for Equilibrium Price and Quantity

Now, we need to solve for the equilibrium price (P) and quantity (Q) in terms of given parameters (a, b, c, d, g) and income (I). To solve for P, rearrange the equation: \(P(b - g) = d - a - cI\) Now divide by \((b - g)\): \(P = \frac{d - a - cI}{b - g}\) Now that we have the equilibrium price, we can find the equilibrium quantity by plugging the equilibrium price into either the demand or supply function. Let's use the demand function: \(Q = a + b\left(\frac{d - a - cI}{b - g}\right) + cI\)
03

Find the Comparative Statics Derivative dP*/dI

Now, let's find the derivative of the equilibrium price with respect to income, I: \(\frac{dP}{dI} = \frac{-c}{b - g}\)
04

Verify the Result using Comparative Statics Analysis

To verify that our results are correct, we can use the comparative statics analysis of supply and demand: The demand and supply functions are given by: \(Q_d = D(P, I) = a + bP + cI\) \(Q_s = S(P) = d + gP\) Take the derivative of both the demand and supply functions with respect to P and I: \(\frac{\partial Q_d}{\partial P} = b\) \(\frac{\partial Q_d}{\partial I} = c\) \(\frac{\partial Q_s}{\partial P} = g\) Using the comparative statics formula: \(\frac{dP}{dI} = -\frac{\partial Q_d / \partial I}{\partial Q_d / \partial P - \partial Q_s / \partial P} = -\frac{c}{b - g}\) We can see that both methods yield the same result, which means our analysis is correct.
05

Assigning Values to Parameters and Explaining the Derivative Form

Let's assume the following parameter values: \(a = 100, b = -1, c = 0.5, d = 50,\) and \(g = 2\) The derivative of the equilibrium price with respect to income is then: \(\frac{dP}{dI} = \frac{-0.5}{(-1) - 2} = \frac{-0.5}{-3} = \frac{1}{6}\) This means that for each one-unit increase in income (I), the equilibrium price (P) will increase by \(\frac{1}{6}\). It implies that as the consumer's income increases, they are willing to pay a higher price for the good, which leads to an increase in the equilibrium price.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The supply and demand model presented earlier in this chapter can be used to look at many other comparative statics questions. In this problem you are asked to explore three of them. In all of these, quantity demanded is given by \(D(P, \alpha)\) and quantity supplied by \(S(P, \beta)\) a. Shifts in supply: In Chapter 12 we analyzed the case of a shift in demand by looking at a comparative statics analysis of how changes in \(\alpha\) affect equilibrium price and quantity. For this problem you are to make a similar set of computations for a shift in a parameter of the supply function, \(\beta .\) That is, calculate \(d P^{*} / d \beta\) and \(d Q^{*} / d \beta .\) Be sure to calculate your results in both derivative and elasticity terms. Also describe with some simple graphs why the results here differ from those shown in the body of Chapter 12 b. \(\mathbf{A}\) quantity \(^{\text {- wed }}\) we" \(_{\pm}\) In our analysis of the imposition of a unit tax we showed how such a tax wedge can affect equilibrium price and quantity. A similar analysis can be done for a quantity "wedge" for which, in equilibrium, the quantity supplied may exceed the quantity demanded. Such a situation might arise, for example, if some portion of production were lost through spoilage or if some portion of production were demanded by the government as a payment for the right to do business. Formally, let \(\bar{Q}\) be the amount of the good lost. In this case equilibrium requires \(D(P)=Q\) and \(S(P)=Q+\bar{Q}\). Use the comparative statics methods developed in this chapter to calculate \(d P^{*} / d \bar{Q}\) and \(d Q^{*} / d \bar{Q} .\) [ In many cases it might be more reasonable to assume \(\bar{Q}=\delta Q\) (where \(\delta\) is a small decimal value). Without making any explicit calculations, how do you think this case would differ from the one you explicitly analyzed? c. The identification problem: An important issue in the empirical study of competitive markets is to decide whether observed price-quantity data points represent demand curves, supply curves, or some combination of the two. Explain the following conclusions using the comparative statics results we have obtained: I. If only the demand parameter \(\alpha\) takes on changing values, data on changing equilibrium values of price and quantity can be used to estimate the price elasticity of supply. ii. If only the supply parameter \(\beta\) takes on changing values, data on changing equilibrium values of price and quantity can be used to evaluate the price elasticity of supply (to answer this, you must have done part (a) of this problem). iii. If demand and supply curves are both only shifted by the same parameter [i.e., the demand and supply functions are \(D(P, \alpha) \text { and } S(P, \alpha)],\) neither of the price elasticities can be evaluated.

One way to generate disequilibrium prices in a simple model of supply and demand is to incorporate a lag into producer's supply response. To examine this possibility, assume that quantity demanded in period \(t\) depends on price in that period \(\left(Q_{i}^{p}=a-b P_{t}\right)\) but that quantity supplied depends on the previous period's price-perhaps because farmers refer to that price in planting a crop \(\left(Q_{t}^{s}=c+d P_{t-1}\right)\) a What is the equilibrium price in this model \(\left(P^{*}=\right.\) \(P_{t}=P_{t-1}\), for all periods, \(t\) b. If \(P_{0}\) represents an initial price for this good to which suppliers respond, what will the value of \(P_{1}\), be? c. By repeated substitution, develop a formula for any arbitrary \(P_{t}\) as a function of \(P_{0}\) and \(t\) d. Use your results from part (a) to restate the value of \(P_{r}\) as a function of \(P_{0}, P^{\prime \prime},\) and \(t\) e. Under what conditions will \(P_{t}\) converge to \(P^{*}\) as \(t \rightarrow \infty ?\) f. Graph your results for the case \(a=4, b=2, c=1\) \(d=1,\) and \(P_{0}=0 .\) Use your graph to discuss the origin of the term cobweb model.

The perfectly competitive videotape-copying industry is composed of many firms that can copy five tapes per day at an average cost of \(\$ 10\) per tape. Each firm must also pay a royalty to film studios, and the per-film royalty rate \((r)\) is an increasing function of total industry output \((Q)\) : \\[ r=0.002 Q \\] Demand is given by \\[ Q=D(P)=1,050-50 P \\] a. Assuming the industry is in long-run equilibrium, what will be the equilibrium price and quantity of copied tapes? How many tape firms will there be? What will the per-film royalty rate be? b. Suppose that demand for copied tapes increases to \\[ Q=D(P)=1,600-50 P \\] In this case, what is the long-run equilibrium price and quantity for copied tapes? How many tape firms are there? What is the per-film royalty rate? c. Graph these long-run equilibria in the tape market, and calculate the increase in producer surplus between the situations described in parts (a) and (b). d. Show that the increase in producer surplus is precisely equal to the increase in royalties paid as \(Q\) expands incrementally from its level in part (b) to its level in part (c). e. Suppose that the government institutes a \(\$ 5.50\) per-film tax on the film-copying industry. Assuming that the demand for copied films is that given in part (a), how will this tax affect the market cquilibrium? f. How will the burden of this tax be allocated between consumers and producers? What will be the loss of consumer and producer surplus? g. Show that the loss of producer surplus as a result of this tax is borne completely by the film studios. Explain your result intuitively.

Suppose that the demand for stilts is given by \\[ Q=D(P)=1,500-50 P \\] and that the long-run total operating costs of each stiltmaking firm in a competitive industry are given by \\[ C(q)=0.5 q^{2}-10 q \\] Entrepreneurial talent for stilt making is scarce. The supply curve for entrepreneurs is given by \\[ Q_{s}=0.25 w \\] where \(w\) is the annual wage paid. Suppose also that each stilt-making firm requires one (and only one) entrepreneur (hence the quantity of entrepreneurs hired is equal to the number of firms). Long-run total costs for each firm are then given by \\[ C(q, w)=0.5 q^{2}-10 q+w \\] a What is the long-run equilibrium quantity of stilts produced? How many stilts are produced by each firm? What is the long-run equilibrium price of stilts? How many firms will there be? How many entrepreneurs will be hired, and what is their wage? b. Suppose that the demand for stilts shifts outward to \\[ Q=D(P)=2,428-50 P \\] How would you now answer the questions posed in part (a)? c. Because stilt-making entrepreneurs are the cause of the upward-sloping long-run supply curve in this problem, they will receive all rents generated as industry output expands. Calculate the increase in rents between parts (a) and (b). Show that this value is identical to the change in long-run producer surplus as measured along the stilt supply curve.

The handmade snuffbox industry is composed of 100 identical firms, each having short-run total costs given by \\[ S T C=0.5 q^{2}+10 q+5 \\] and short-run marginal costs given by \\[ S M C=q+10 \\] where \(q\) is the output of snuffboxes per day. a What is the short-run supply curve for each snuffbox maker? What is the short-run supply curve for the market as a whole? b. Suppose the demand for total snuffbox production is given by \\[ Q=D(P)=1,100-50 P \\] What will be the equilibrium in this marketplace? What will each firm's total short-run profits be? c. Graph the market equilibrium and compute total shortrun producer surplus in this case. d. Show that the total producer surplus you calculated in part (c) is equal to total industry profits plus industry short-run fixed costs. c. Suppose the government imposed a \(\$ 3\) tax on snuffboxes. How would this tax change the market equilibrium? f. How would the burden of this tax be shared between snuffbox buyers and sellers? g. Calculate the total loss of producer surplus as a result of the taxation of snuffboxes. Show that this loss equals the change in total short-run profits in the snuffbox industry. Why do fixed costs not enter into this computation of the change in short-run producer surplus?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free