Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

One way to generate disequilibrium prices in a simple model of supply and demand is to incorporate a lag into producer's supply response. To examine this possibility, assume that quantity demanded in period \(t\) depends on price in that period \(\left(Q_{i}^{p}=a-b P_{t}\right)\) but that quantity supplied depends on the previous period's price-perhaps because farmers refer to that price in planting a crop \(\left(Q_{t}^{s}=c+d P_{t-1}\right)\) a What is the equilibrium price in this model \(\left(P^{*}=\right.\) \(P_{t}=P_{t-1}\), for all periods, \(t\) b. If \(P_{0}\) represents an initial price for this good to which suppliers respond, what will the value of \(P_{1}\), be? c. By repeated substitution, develop a formula for any arbitrary \(P_{t}\) as a function of \(P_{0}\) and \(t\) d. Use your results from part (a) to restate the value of \(P_{r}\) as a function of \(P_{0}, P^{\prime \prime},\) and \(t\) e. Under what conditions will \(P_{t}\) converge to \(P^{*}\) as \(t \rightarrow \infty ?\) f. Graph your results for the case \(a=4, b=2, c=1\) \(d=1,\) and \(P_{0}=0 .\) Use your graph to discuss the origin of the term cobweb model.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The price will converge to the equilibrium price as the number of periods goes to infinity if and only if the absolute value of the coefficient of the lag price in the supply function is smaller than the absolute value of the coefficient of the price in the demand function (|d| < |b|).

Step by step solution

01

Equilibrium price

To find the equilibrium price \(P^*\), we need to equate the quantity demanded and quantity supplied under the condition that the price does not change between periods i.e., \(P_t = P_{t-1}\). Set \(Q^p_t=Q^s_t\), i.e., \(a−bP_t=c+dP_{t−1}\). Since \(P_t = P_{t-1}\), we can rewrite the equation as \(a−bP^* = c+dP^*\). Now, we can solve for \(P^*\): \(P^* = \frac{a - c}{b + d}\)
02

Value of \(P_1\)

Given an initial price, \(P_0\), suppliers react according to \(Q^s_t = c + d P_{t-1}\). We want to find the value of \(P_1\) where the quantity demanded equals the quantity supplied: \(a - b P_1 = c + d P_0\). Solving for \(P_1\), we get: \(P_1=\frac{a-c+dP_0}b\).
03

Formula for any arbitrary \(P_t\)

By repeated substitution, we can express any \(P_t\) as a function of \(P_0\) and \(t\). First, notice that the equation for \(P_t\) with the lag can be expressed as: \(P_t = \frac{a-c+dP_{t-1}}b\). Using this recursive formula, we can calculate \(P_t\) iteratively as: \(P_t = \frac{a-c}{b}+\frac{d^n}{b}P_0\) , where \(n\) denotes the number of periods.
04

Restating value of \(P_t\)

Using the result from step 1, we can restate the value of \(P_t\) as a function of \(P_0\), \(P^{*}\), and \(t\). Using the formula from step 3, we get: \(P_t = \frac{a-c}{b}+\frac{d^n}{b} (P_0 - P^*)\).
05

Conditions for convergence

The price will converge to \(P^*\) when \(t\) goes to infinity if and only if the term \(\frac{d^n}{b}\) goes to zero: \(\lim_{t\to\infty} \frac{d^n}{b} = 0\). This will occur if \(|d|<|b|\), which means that the coefficient of the lag price in the supply function is smaller in absolute value than the coefficient of the price in the demand function.
06

Graphical representation and cobweb model

Graph the results for the case \(a=4, b=2, c=1, d=1,\) and \(P_0=0\). The convergence properties can be best visualized with a cobweb model. The cobweb model is a graphical representation of the sequence of prices in this lagged supply-demand setting. A cobweb diagram is drawn as follows: First, a supply curve, \(a - bP = c + dP_{t-1}\), and the demand curve, \(Q_t^p = a - bP_t\), are plotted, along with the path of prices over time using the recursive formula derived above. Step by step, prices are represented as a movement along the demand curve and supply curve with the lag. The name "cobweb model" comes from the graphical representation of the sequence of prices, forming a web-like pattern as the price converges or diverges over time. In this particular case, the price will not converge to equilibrium because the values of coefficients \(b\) and \(d\) are equal: \(|d|=|b|\). Thus, the price will oscillate between \(0\) and \(\frac{(a-c)}{b}\) indefinitely, forming a web pattern on the graph.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that the demand for stilts is given by \\[ Q=D(P)=1,500-50 P \\] and that the long-run total operating costs of each stiltmaking firm in a competitive industry are given by \\[ C(q)=0.5 q^{2}-10 q \\] Entrepreneurial talent for stilt making is scarce. The supply curve for entrepreneurs is given by \\[ Q_{s}=0.25 w \\] where \(w\) is the annual wage paid. Suppose also that each stilt-making firm requires one (and only one) entrepreneur (hence the quantity of entrepreneurs hired is equal to the number of firms). Long-run total costs for each firm are then given by \\[ C(q, w)=0.5 q^{2}-10 q+w \\] a What is the long-run equilibrium quantity of stilts produced? How many stilts are produced by each firm? What is the long-run equilibrium price of stilts? How many firms will there be? How many entrepreneurs will be hired, and what is their wage? b. Suppose that the demand for stilts shifts outward to \\[ Q=D(P)=2,428-50 P \\] How would you now answer the questions posed in part (a)? c. Because stilt-making entrepreneurs are the cause of the upward-sloping long-run supply curve in this problem, they will receive all rents generated as industry output expands. Calculate the increase in rents between parts (a) and (b). Show that this value is identical to the change in long-run producer surplus as measured along the stilt supply curve.

The handmade snuffbox industry is composed of 100 identical firms, each having short-run total costs given by \\[ S T C=0.5 q^{2}+10 q+5 \\] and short-run marginal costs given by \\[ S M C=q+10 \\] where \(q\) is the output of snuffboxes per day. a What is the short-run supply curve for each snuffbox maker? What is the short-run supply curve for the market as a whole? b. Suppose the demand for total snuffbox production is given by \\[ Q=D(P)=1,100-50 P \\] What will be the equilibrium in this marketplace? What will each firm's total short-run profits be? c. Graph the market equilibrium and compute total shortrun producer surplus in this case. d. Show that the total producer surplus you calculated in part (c) is equal to total industry profits plus industry short-run fixed costs. c. Suppose the government imposed a \(\$ 3\) tax on snuffboxes. How would this tax change the market equilibrium? f. How would the burden of this tax be shared between snuffbox buyers and sellers? g. Calculate the total loss of producer surplus as a result of the taxation of snuffboxes. Show that this loss equals the change in total short-run profits in the snuffbox industry. Why do fixed costs not enter into this computation of the change in short-run producer surplus?

The development of optimal tax policy has been a major topic in public finance for centuries." Probably the most famous result in the theory of optimal taxation is due to the English economist Frank Ramsey, who conceptualized the problem as how to structure a tax system that would collect a given amount of revenues with the minimal deadweight loss." Specifically, suppose there are \(n\) goods \(\left(x_{i} \text { with prices } p_{i}\right)\) to be taxed with a sequence of ad valorem taxes (see Problem 12.10 ) whose rates are given by \(t_{i}(i=1, n)\). Therefore, total tax revenue is given by \(T=\Sigma_{l=1}^{l} t_{l} p_{i} x_{l}\). Ramsey's problem is for a fixed \(T\) to choose tax rates that will minimize total deadweight \(\operatorname{loss} D W=\Sigma_{j=1}^{m} D W\left(t_{i}\right)\) a. Use the Lagrange multiplier method to show that the solution to Ramsey's problem requires \(t_{i}=\lambda\left(1 / e_{s}-1 / e_{n}\right)\) where \(\lambda\), is the Lagrange multiplier for the tax constraint. b. Interpret the Ramsey result intuitively. c. Describe some shortcomings of the Ramsey approach to optimal taxation.

Throughout this chapter our analysis of taxes has assumed that they are imposed on a per-unit basis. Many taxes (such as sales taxes ) are proportional, based on the price of the item. In this problem you are asked to show that, assuming the tax rate is reasonably small, the market consequences of such a \(\operatorname{tax}\) are quite similar to those already analyzed. To do so, we now assume that the price received by suppliers is given by \(P\) and the price paid by demanders is \(P(1+t),\) where \(t\) is the ad valorem tax rate (i.e., with a tax rate of 5 percent, \(t=0.05\), the price paid by demanders is \(1.05 P\) ). In this problem then the supply function is given by \(Q=S(P)\) and the demand function by \(Q=D[(1+t) P]\) a. Show that for such a tax $$\frac{d \ln P}{d t}=\frac{e_{D, P}}{e_{S, P}-e_{D, P}}$$. (Hint: Remember that \(d \ln P / d t=\frac{1}{P} \cdot \frac{d P}{d t}\) and that here we are assuming \(t \otimes 0 .\) b. Show that the excess burden of such a small ad valorem tax is given by: \\[ D W=-0.5 \frac{e_{D . p} e_{S . P}}{e_{S, P}-e_{D, P}} t^{2} P^{*} Q^{*} \\] c. Compare these results to those derived in this chapter for a per-unit tax. Can you make any statements about which tax would be superior in various circumstances?

Suppose that the market demand for a product is given by \(Q_{D}=D(P)=A-B P\). Suppose also that the typical firm's cost function is given by \(C(q)=k+a q+b q^{2}\) a. Compute the long-run equilibrium output and price for the typical firm in this market. b. Calculate the equilibrium number of firms in this market as a function of all the parameters in this problem. c. Describe how changes in the demand parameters \(A\) and \(B\) affect the equilibrium number of firms in this market. Explain your results intuitively. d. Describe how the parameters of the typical firm's cost function affect the long-run equilibrium number of firms in this example. Explain your results intuitively.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free