Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Would a lump-sum profits tax affect the profit-maximizing quantity of output? How about a proportional tax on profits? How about a tax assessed on each unit of output? How about a tax on labor input?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: A tax assessed on each unit of output and a tax on labor input will result in a reduction in the profit-maximizing quantity of output for a firm.

Step by step solution

01

Lump-sum profits tax

A lump-sum profits tax is a fixed amount of tax that the firm has to pay, regardless of its level of output or profit. This means that the tax liability of the firm does not change with the quantity of output produced. Consequently, a lump-sum tax will have no effect on the marginal cost of production, and the profit-maximizing quantity of output produced by the firm will remain unchanged.
02

Proportional tax on profits

A proportional tax on profits is a tax that is assessed based on a certain percentage of the firm's total profit. In this case, the taxation depends on the level of profit, but not on the quantity of output. Since it does affect the profit directly, it does not influence the marginal cost. Thus, the profit-maximizing quantity of output will not be affected by a proportional tax on profits.
03

Tax assessed on each unit of output

A tax assessed on each unit of output is a tax that the firm has to pay on each product it sells. This type of tax increases the cost of production for each unit produced. This will result in an increase in the marginal cost, which will shift the marginal cost curve upward. In this case, the profit-maximizing quantity of output will change, as the firm will now produce a lower quantity of output in order to maximize its profits.
04

Tax on labor input

A tax on labor input is a tax that the firm has to pay based on the amount of labor it employs. This tax will increase the cost of employing labor, which in turn will increase the cost of production for the firm. As the production cost increases, the marginal cost curve shifts upward. Consequently, the profit-maximizing quantity of output produced by the firm will be lower, as the firm will try to minimize its costs to maximize its profits. In conclusion, a lump-sum profits tax and a proportional tax on profits will not affect the profit-maximizing quantity of output, while a tax assessed on each unit of output and a tax on labor input will result in a reduction in the profit-maximizing quantity of output.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Lump-Sum Profits Tax
When businesses face a lump-sum profits tax, they are required to pay a fixed tax amount regardless of how much they produce or earn. This form of taxation is akin to a flat fee, whereby the financial obligation to the government doesn't fluctuate with profits or output levels. It's intuitive to think that any tax would dissuade production, but in the context of a lump-sum tax, this isn't the case. From an economics standpoint, as long as this tax doesn't alter the marginal costs—those additional costs incurred from producing one more unit of good—the company's behavior in terms of how much to produce remains the same. This is crucial for it means that the profit-maximizing quantity of output will not be influenced by such a tax.
Proportional Tax on Profits
A proportional tax on profits, also known as a variable tax, scales with the level of a firm's earnings. Unlike a lump-sum tax, a greater profit leads to a higher tax bill. Despite this, the tax's proportional nature ensures that it still doesn't impact the company's production decisions for each additional unit. Since the tax is based on total profits rather than on a per-unit basis, the marginal cost—important for determining the profit-maximizing level of output—remains unaffected. As a result, businesses won't alter the quantity of output they produce to maximize profit even as they pay more tax with higher earnings.
Tax on Output
Introducing a tax on output presents a contrasting scenario for firms. Here, unlike lump-sum or proportional profits taxes, the tax is tied directly to the quantity of items produced. This can be likened to a sales tax, where each unit sold carries a tax cost. Such a tax adds to the marginal cost of production because it becomes costlier to make each additional item. Naturally, with increased marginal costs, the company's profit-maximizing output will shift. Firms will typically respond by reducing production since the added cost from the tax means that producing the same quantity as before is less profitable.
Tax on Labor Input
A tax on labor input targets the workforce element of production, levying a tax based on the amount of labor used in the manufacturing process. Similar to a tax on output, a tax on labor raises the cost of production—but through the channel of labor expenses instead of material or sales costs. Such an increase in labor costs leads to a higher overall marginal cost for the firm. Hence, to maintain profitability, firms tend to adjust their production strategies—even it means reducing their labor force or the number of goods produced. The result is a decreased profit-maximizing quantity of output as firms seek to lower their now-increased production costs.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

This problem concerns the relationship between demand and marginal revenue curves for a few functional forms. a. Show that, for a linear demand curve, the marginal revenue curve bisects the distance between the vertical axis and the demand curve for any price. b. Show that, for any linear demand curve, the vertical distance between the demand and marginal revenue curves is \(-1 / b \cdot q,\) where \(b(<0)\) is the slope of the demand curve. c. Show that, for a constant elasticity demand curve of the form \(q=a P^{b},\) the vertical distance between the demand and marginal revenue curves is a constant ratio of the height of the demand curve, with this constant depending on the price elasticity of demand. d. Show that, for any downward-sloping demand curve, the vertical distance between the demand and marginal revenue curves at any point can be found by using a linear approximation to the demand curve at that point and applying the procedure described in part (b). e. Graph the results of parts (a)-(d) of this problem.

Universal Widget produces high-quality widgets at its plant in Gulch, Nevada, for sale throughout the world. The cost function for total widget production \((q)\) is given by total cost \(=0.25 q^{2}\) Widgets are demanded only in Australia (where the demand curve is given by \(q_{A}=100-2 P_{A}\) and Lapland (where the demand curve is given by \(q_{L}=100-4 P_{L}\) ); thus, total demand equals \(q=q_{A}+q_{L}\). If Universal Widget can control the quantities supplied to cach market, how many should it sell in each location to maximize total profits? What price will be charged in each location?

Because firms have greater flexibility in the long run, their reactions to price changes may be greater in the long run than in the short run. Paul Samuelson was perhaps the first economist to recognize that such reactions were analogous to a principle from physical chemistry termed the Le Châtelier's Principle. The basic idea of the principle is that any disturbance to an equilibrium (such as that caused by a price change) will not only have a direct effect but may also set off feedback effects that enhance the response. In this problem we look at a few examples. Consider a price-taking firm that chooses its inputs to maximize a profit function of the \\[ \text { form } \Pi(P, v, w)=P f(k, l)-w l-v k . \text { This maximiza- } \\] tion process will yield optimal solutions of the general form \(q^{*}(P, v, w), l^{*}(P, v, w),\) and \(k^{*}(P, v, w) .\) If we constrain capital input to be fixed at \(\bar{k}\) in the short run, this firm's short-run responses can be represented by \(q^{s}(P, w, \bar{k})\) and \(l^{s}(P, w, \bar{k})\) a. Using the definitional relation \(q^{*}(P, v, w)=q^{*}(P, w\) \(\left.k^{\prime \prime}(P, v, w)\right),\) show that $$\frac{\partial q^{*}}{\partial P}=\frac{\partial q^{s}}{\partial P}+\frac{-\left(\frac{\partial k^{*}}{\partial P}\right)^{2}}{\frac{\partial k^{*}}{\partial v}}$$ Do this in three steps. First, differentiate the definitional relation with respect to \(P\) using the chain rule. Next, differentiate the definitional relation with respect to \(v\) (again using the chain rule), and use the result to substitute for \(\partial q^{s} / \partial k\) in the initial derivative. Finally, substitute a result analogous to part (c) of Problem 11.10 to give the displayed equation. b. Use the result from part (a) to argue that \(\partial q^{*} / \partial P \geq\) \(\partial q^{s} / \partial P .\) This establishes Le Châtelier's Principle for supply: Long-run supply responses are larger than (constrained short-run supply responses. c. Using similar methods as in parts (a) and (b), prove that Le Châtelier's Principle applies to the effect of the wage on labor demand. That is, starting from the definitional relation \(l^{*}(P, v, w)=l^{*}\left(P, w, k^{*}(P, v, w)\right),\) show that \(\partial l^{*} / \partial w \leq \partial l^{5} / \partial w,\) implying that long-run labor demand falls more when wage goes up than short-run labor demand (note that both of these derivatives are negative). d. Develop your own analysis of the difference between the short-and long-run responses of the firm's cost function \([C(v, w, q)]\) to a change in the wage \((w)\)

Young's theorem can be used in combination with the envelope results in this chapter to derive some useful results. a. Show that \(\partial l(P, v, w) / \partial v=\partial k(P, v, w) / \partial w .\) Interpret this result using substitution and output effects. b. Use the result from part (a) to show how a unit tax on labor would be expected to affect capital input. c. Show that \(\partial q / \partial w=-\partial l / \partial P\). Interpret this result. d. Use the result from part (c) to discuss how a unit tax on labor input would affect quantity supplied.

Suppose that a firm's production function exhibits technical improvements over time and that the form of the function is \(q=f(k, l, t) .\) In this case, we can measure the proportional rate of technical change as \\[ \frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t}=\frac{f_{t}}{f} \\] (compare this with the treatment in Chapter 9 ). Show that this rate of change can also be measured using the profit function as \\[ \frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t}=\frac{\Pi(P, v, w, t)}{P q} \cdot \frac{\partial \ln \Pi}{\partial t} \\] That is, rather than using the production function directly, technical change can be measured by knowing the share of profits in total revenue and the proportionate change in profits over time (holding all prices constant). This approach to measuring technical change may be preferable when data on actual input levels do not exist.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free