Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that a firm's production function exhibits technical improvements over time and that the form of the function is \(q=f(k, l, t) .\) In this case, we can measure the proportional rate of technical change as \\[ \frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t}=\frac{f_{t}}{f} \\] (compare this with the treatment in Chapter 9 ). Show that this rate of change can also be measured using the profit function as \\[ \frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t}=\frac{\Pi(P, v, w, t)}{P q} \cdot \frac{\partial \ln \Pi}{\partial t} \\] That is, rather than using the production function directly, technical change can be measured by knowing the share of profits in total revenue and the proportionate change in profits over time (holding all prices constant). This approach to measuring technical change may be preferable when data on actual input levels do not exist.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Show that the rate of technical change can also be measured using the profit function. Answer: The rate of technical change can be measured using the profit function by applying the formula: \\[ \frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t} = \frac{\Pi(P, v, w, t)}{Pq} \cdot \frac{\partial \ln \Pi}{\partial t}. \\] This alternative approach is useful when data on actual input levels are not available, and we only need to know the share of profits in total revenue and the proportionate change in profits over time, while holding all prices constant.

Step by step solution

01

Introducing the Profit Function

First, let's define the profit function for this firm. The profit function, denoted \(\Pi(P, v, w, t)\), is given by the firm's total revenue (\(Pq\), where \(P\) is the price of the produced good) minus its total costs (\(vk+wl\), where \(v\) and \(w\) are the input costs of capital \(k\) and labor \(l\) respectively): \\[ \Pi(P, v, w, t) = Pq - (vk+wl). \\]
02

Differentiating the profit function with respect to time

Now, let's differentiate the profit function with respect to time (\(t\)) while holding the input prices (\(P\), \(v\), and \(w\)) constant: \\[ \frac{\partial \Pi(P, v, w, t)}{\partial t} = P\frac{\partial q}{\partial t} - v\frac{\partial k}{\partial t} - w\frac{\partial l}{\partial t}. \\]
03

Connecting the technical change to the profit function

As we need to find a relationship between the technical change rate and profit function, let's now multiply both sides of the equation derived in Step 2 by \(f\) and rearrange for \(\frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t}\): \\[ \frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t} = \frac{f_{t}}{f} = \frac{(P\frac{\partial q}{\partial t} - v\frac{\partial k}{\partial t} - w\frac{\partial l}{\partial t})f}{Pq} = \frac{\Pi(P, v, w, t)}{Pq}\cdot\frac{\partial \ln \Pi}{\partial t}. \\] We have shown that the rate of technical change can also be measured using the profit function as \\[ \frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t} = \frac{\Pi(P, v, w, t)}{Pq} \cdot \frac{\partial \ln \Pi}{\partial t}. \\] This alternative approach can be useful when data on actual input levels (i.e., \(k\) and \(l\)) are not available, as we only need to know the share of profits in total revenue and the proportionate change in profits over time, while holding all prices constant.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Production Function
Understanding a firm’s production function is crucial when analyzing its efficiency and capabilities. A production function, represented as \( q = f(k, l, t) \), describes the relationship between the quantity of output produced (\( q \)) and the input factors such as capital (\( k \)), labor (\( l \)), and often time (\( t \)) signifying technological progress or other changes over time.

The inclusion of time in this function allows us to measure how production efficiency changes due to technological advancements, enhancing our understanding of a firm's dynamic production capabilities. This can be quantitatively analyzed by determining the proportional rate of technical change, which indicates how output responds to technological progress over time.
Profit Function
The profit function represents a firm’s financial health by calculating the difference between total revenue and total costs. Expressed as \( \Pi(P, v, w, t) = Pq - (vk+wl) \), where \( P \) is the price of the output, \( q \) is the quantity of goods produced, \( v \) and \( w \) are the input prices of capital and labor, respectively, and \( k \) and \( l \) are the quantities of capital and labor used.

By analyzing the profit function, especially how it changes over time with respect to \( t \), we can gain insights into how technical change impacts profits, keeping input prices constant. This approach is especially advantageous when direct measurement using production inputs is not possible.
Proportional Rate of Technical Change
The proportional rate of technical change is a measure of the intensity and pace at which technology impacts the production process. Mathematically, it is represented as \( \frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t} = \frac{f_{t}}{f} \). This essentially captures the percentage change in output due to a one-unit change in time, holding all other factors constant.

Moreover, the exercise demonstrates that this rate of technical change can be equivalently expressed through the profit function as \( \frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t} = \frac{\Pi(P, v, w, t)}{Pq} \cdot \frac{\partial \ln \Pi}{\partial t} \). This method leverages the idea that profits incorporate all the effects of technical change, making it a proxy for assessing the rate at which a firm’s technology is improving when direct measurement from the production function is not feasible.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

This problem has you work through some of the calculations associated with the numerical example in the Extensions. Refer to the Extensions for a discussion of the theory in the case of Fisher Body and General Motors (GM), who we imagine are deciding between remaining as separate firms or having GM acquire Fisher Body and thus become one (larger) firm. Let the total surplus that the units generate together be \(S\left(x_{P}, x_{G}\right)=x_{F}^{1 / 2}+a x_{G}^{1 / 2},\) where \(x_{F}\) and \(x_{G}\) are the investments undertaken by the managers of the two units before negotiating, and where a unit of investment costs \(\$ 1 .\) The parameter \(a\) measures the importance of GM's manager's investment. Show that, according to the property rights model worked out in the Extensions, it is efficient for GM to acquire Fisher Body if and only if GM's manager's investment is important enough, in particular, if \(a>\sqrt{3}\)

Young's theorem can be used in combination with the envelope results in this chapter to derive some useful results. a. Show that \(\partial l(P, v, w) / \partial v=\partial k(P, v, w) / \partial w .\) Interpret this result using substitution and output effects. b. Use the result from part (a) to show how a unit tax on labor would be expected to affect capital input. c. Show that \(\partial q / \partial w=-\partial l / \partial P\). Interpret this result. d. Use the result from part (c) to discuss how a unit tax on labor input would affect quantity supplied.

Because firms have greater flexibility in the long run, their reactions to price changes may be greater in the long run than in the short run. Paul Samuelson was perhaps the first economist to recognize that such reactions were analogous to a principle from physical chemistry termed the Le Châtelier's Principle. The basic idea of the principle is that any disturbance to an equilibrium (such as that caused by a price change) will not only have a direct effect but may also set off feedback effects that enhance the response. In this problem we look at a few examples. Consider a price-taking firm that chooses its inputs to maximize a profit function of the \\[ \text { form } \Pi(P, v, w)=P f(k, l)-w l-v k . \text { This maximiza- } \\] tion process will yield optimal solutions of the general form \(q^{*}(P, v, w), l^{*}(P, v, w),\) and \(k^{*}(P, v, w) .\) If we constrain capital input to be fixed at \(\bar{k}\) in the short run, this firm's short-run responses can be represented by \(q^{s}(P, w, \bar{k})\) and \(l^{s}(P, w, \bar{k})\) a. Using the definitional relation \(q^{*}(P, v, w)=q^{*}(P, w\) \(\left.k^{\prime \prime}(P, v, w)\right),\) show that $$\frac{\partial q^{*}}{\partial P}=\frac{\partial q^{s}}{\partial P}+\frac{-\left(\frac{\partial k^{*}}{\partial P}\right)^{2}}{\frac{\partial k^{*}}{\partial v}}$$ Do this in three steps. First, differentiate the definitional relation with respect to \(P\) using the chain rule. Next, differentiate the definitional relation with respect to \(v\) (again using the chain rule), and use the result to substitute for \(\partial q^{s} / \partial k\) in the initial derivative. Finally, substitute a result analogous to part (c) of Problem 11.10 to give the displayed equation. b. Use the result from part (a) to argue that \(\partial q^{*} / \partial P \geq\) \(\partial q^{s} / \partial P .\) This establishes Le Châtelier's Principle for supply: Long-run supply responses are larger than (constrained short-run supply responses. c. Using similar methods as in parts (a) and (b), prove that Le Châtelier's Principle applies to the effect of the wage on labor demand. That is, starting from the definitional relation \(l^{*}(P, v, w)=l^{*}\left(P, w, k^{*}(P, v, w)\right),\) show that \(\partial l^{*} / \partial w \leq \partial l^{5} / \partial w,\) implying that long-run labor demand falls more when wage goes up than short-run labor demand (note that both of these derivatives are negative). d. Develop your own analysis of the difference between the short-and long-run responses of the firm's cost function \([C(v, w, q)]\) to a change in the wage \((w)\)

Would a lump-sum profits tax affect the profit-maximizing quantity of output? How about a proportional tax on profits? How about a tax assessed on each unit of output? How about a tax on labor input?

John's Lawn Mowing Service is a small business that acts as a price-taker (i.e., \(M R=P\) ). The prevailing market price of lawn mowing is \(\$ 20\) per acre. John's costs are given by \\[ \text { total cost }=0.1 q^{2}+10 q+50 \\] where \(q=\) the number of acres John chooses to cut a day. a. How many acres should John choose to cut to maximize profit? b. Calculate John's maximum daily profit. c. Graph these results, and label John's supply curve.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free