Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The CES production function can be generalized to permit weighting of the inputs. In the two-input case, this function is $$q=f(k, l)=\left[(\alpha k)^{\rho}+(\beta l)^{\rho}\right]^{\gamma / \rho}$$ a. What is the total-cost function for a firm with this production function? Hint: You can, of course, work this out from scratch; easier perhaps is to use the results from Example 10.2 and reason that the price for a unit of capital input in this production function is \(v / \alpha\) and for a unit of labor input is \(w / \beta\) b. If \(\gamma=1\) and \(\alpha+\beta=1,\) it can be shown that this production function converges to the Cobb-Douglas form \(q=k^{\alpha} l^{\beta}\) as \(\rho \rightarrow 0 .\) What is the total cost function for this particular version of the CES function? c. The relative labor cost share for a two-input production function is given by wl/ \(v k .\) Show that this share is constant for the Cobb-Douglas function in part (b). How is the relative labor share affected by the parameters \(\alpha\) and \(b ?\) d. Calculate the relative labor cost share for the general CES function introduced above. How is that share affected by changes in \(w / v ?\) How is the direction of this effect determined by the elasticity of substitution, \(\sigma\) ? How is it affected by the sizes of the parameters \(\alpha\) and \(\beta ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Calculate the relative labor cost share for the general CES function. Answer: The relative labor cost share for the general CES function is: $$\frac{wl}{vk} = \frac{w \cdot \frac{[\frac{q^\rho}{\beta}]^{\frac{1}{\rho}} - \alpha k^{\rho}}{\beta}}{v \cdot \frac{[\frac{q^\rho}{\alpha}]^{\frac{1}{\rho}} - \beta l^{\rho}}{\alpha}}$$ The magnitude of this share depends on the ratio of \(w/v\), the elasticity of substitution (\(\sigma\)), and the values of \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\). If \(\rho > 0\), an increase in \(\sigma\) leads to a decrease in the labor cost share, while if \(\rho < 0\), an increase in \(\sigma\) results in an increase in the labor cost share. The values of \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) influence the labor cost share similarly to the Cobb-Douglas case.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the expression for production function given in the problem.

The generalized CES production function has the form: $$q = [\alpha k^{\rho} + \beta l^{\rho}]^{\gamma / \rho}$$
02

Rewrite the production function by isolating the variables k and l.

Expressing k and l in terms of q and the other parameters: $$k = \left (\frac{[\frac{q^\rho}{\alpha}]^{\frac{1}{\rho}} - \beta l^{\rho}}{\alpha} \right)^{\frac{1}{\rho}}$$ $$l = \left (\frac{[\frac{q^\rho}{\beta}]^{\frac{1}{\rho}} - \alpha k^{\rho}}{\beta} \right)^{\frac{1}{\rho}}$$
03

Calculate the total cost function using given hint about prices.

The total cost function is expressed as \(C(w,v) = vk + wl\). Knowledge from Example 10.2 tells us that the price for a unit of capital input in this production function is \(v/\alpha\) and for a unit of labor input is \(w/\beta\). Now, we can substitute the values of k and l from the step above, and express the total cost function as: $$C(w,v) = w \cdot \frac{[\frac{q^\rho}{\beta}]^{\frac{1}{\rho}} - \alpha k^{\rho}}{\beta} + v \cdot \frac{[\frac{q^\rho}{\alpha}]^{\frac{1}{\rho}} - \beta l^{\rho}}{\alpha}$$ This is the total cost function for the firm with the generalized CES production function. b) Finding the total cost function for the specific version of the CES function.
04

Specify given conditions for the parameters.

We are given the conditions \(\gamma = 1\) and \(\alpha + \beta = 1\).
05

Find the CES production function under the specified conditions.

Under the specified conditions, the CES production function converges to the Cobb-Douglas form as \(\rho \rightarrow 0\): $$q = (\alpha k^{\rho} + \beta l^{\rho})^{\frac{1}{\rho}}$$ It converges to: $$q = k^{\alpha} l^{\beta}$$
06

Substitute the Cobb-Douglas function into the total cost function.

Substituting the values of k and l from the Cobb-Douglas function into the total cost function, we get: $$C(w,v) = w \cdot \frac{l}{\beta} + v \cdot \frac{k}{\alpha}$$ c) Show that the relative labor cost share is constant for the Cobb-Douglas function.
07

Calculate the relative labor cost share for the Cobb-Douglas function.

The relative labor cost share, represented by \(\frac{wl}{vk}\), can be found using the Cobb-Douglas total cost function: $$\frac{wl}{vk} = \frac{\frac{l}{\beta}}{\frac{k}{\alpha}}$$
08

Simplify the expression for the relative labor cost share.

After simplifying the expression, we find: $$\frac{wl}{vk} = \frac{l \cdot \alpha}{k \cdot \beta}$$ As this expression does not depend on l and k values, the relative labor cost share for this Cobb-Douglas function is constant.
09

Analyze the effect of \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) on the labor cost share.

Increasing alpha raises the relative labor cost share, as l becomes more important. Similarly, increasing \(\beta\) lowers the labor cost share as the contribution of k becomes more important in production. d) Calculate the relative labor cost share for the general CES function.
10

Use the total cost function for the general CES function.

The relative labor cost share is expressed in the total cost function: $$\frac{wl}{vk} = \frac{w \cdot \frac{[\frac{q^\rho}{\beta}]^{\frac{1}{\rho}} - \alpha k^{\rho}}{\beta}}{v \cdot \frac{[\frac{q^\rho}{\alpha}]^{\frac{1}{\rho}} - \beta l^{\rho}}{\alpha}}$$
11

Analyze the effect of \(w/v\), \(\sigma\), \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) on the labor cost share.

The magnitude of the relative labor cost share depends directly on the ratio of \(w/v\). The direction of the effect of the elasticity of substitution (\(\sigma\)) is determined by the sign of \(\rho\): if \(\rho > 0\), an increase in \(\sigma\) leads to a decrease in the labor cost share, and if \(\rho < 0\), an increase in \(\sigma\) leads to an increase in the labor cost share. The values of \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) influence the labor cost share in a similar way as in the Cobb-Douglas case.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that a firm produces two different outputs, the quantities of which are represented by \(q_{1}\) and \(q_{2}\). In general, the firm's total costs can be represented by \(C\left(q_{1}, q_{2}\right)\). This function exhibits economies of scope if \(C\left(q_{1}, 0\right)+C\left(0, q_{2}\right)>C\left(q_{1}, q_{2}\right)\) for all output levels of either good. a. Explain in words why this mathematical formulation implies that costs will be lower in this multiproduct firm than in two single-product firms producing each good separately. b. If the two outputs are actually the same good, we can define total output as \(q=q_{1}+q_{2} .\) Suppose that in this case average cost \((=C / q)\) decreases as \(q\) increases. Show that this firm also enjoys economies of scope under the definition provided here.

Suppose the total-cost function for a firm is given by $$C=q w^{2 / 3} v^{1 / 3}$$ a. Use Shephard's lemma to compute the (constant output) demand functions for inputs \(l\) and \(k\) b. Use your results from part (a) to calculate the underlying production function for \(q\)

The definition of the (Morishima) elasticity of substitution \(s_{i j}\) in Equation 10.54 can be recast in terms of input demand elasticities. This illustrates the basic asymmetry in the definition. a. Show that if only \(w_{j}\) changes, \(s_{i j}=e_{x_{i}^{c} w_{j}}-e_{x_{j}^{*} w_{j}}\) b. Show that if only \(w_{i}\) changes, \(s_{j i}=e_{x_{j}, w_{i}}-e_{x_{i}^{i} w_{i}}\) c. Show that if the production function takes the general CES form \(q=\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{\rho}\right)^{\gamma / \rho}\) for \(\rho \neq 0,\) then all of the Morishima elasticities are the same: \(s_{i j}=1 /(1-\rho)=\sigma\) This is the only case in which the Morishima definition is symmetric.

Many empirical studies of costs report an alternative definition of the elasticity of substitution between inputs. This alternative definition was first proposed by \(\mathrm{R}\). G. \(\mathrm{D}\). Allen in the \(1930 \mathrm{s}\) and further clarified by H. Uzawa in the 1960 s. This definition builds directly on the production function-based elasticity of substitution defined in footnote 6 of Chapter 9 : \(A_{i j}=C_{i j} C / C_{i} C_{j},\) where the subscripts indicate partial differentiation with respect to various input prices. Clearly, the Allen definition is symmetric. a. Show that \(A_{i j}=e_{x_{i}, w_{j}} / s_{j},\) where \(s_{j}\) is the share of input \(j\) in total cost. b. Show that the elasticity of \(s_{i}\) with respect to the price of input \(j\) is related to the Allen elasticity by \(e_{s_{r}, p_{j}}=s_{j}\left(A_{i j}-1\right)\) c. Show that, with only two inputs, \(A_{k l}=1\) for the CobbDouglas case and \(A_{k l}=\sigma\) for the CES case. d. Read Blackorby and Russell (1989: "Will the Real Elas- ticity of Substitution Please Stand Up?") to see why the Morishima definition is preferred for most purposes.

A firm producing hockey sticks has a production function given by $$q=2 \sqrt{k l}$$ .In the short run, the firm's amount of capital equipment is fixed at \(k=100 .\) The rental rate for \(k\) is \(v=\$ 1\), and the wage rate for \(l\) is \(w=\$ 4\) a. Calculate the firm's short-run total cost curve. Calculate the short-run average cost curve. b. What is the firm's short-run marginal cost function? What are the \(S C, S A C,\) and \(S M C\) for the firm if it produces 25 hockey sticks? Fifty hockey sticks? One hundred hockey sticks? Two hundred hockey sticks? c. Graph the \(S A C\) and the \(S M C\) curves for the firm. Indicate the points found in part (b). d. Where does the \(S M C\) curve intersect the \(S A C\) curve? Explain why the \(S M C\) curve will always intersect the \(S A C\) curve at its lowest point. Suppose now that capital used for producing hockey sticks is fixed at \(k_{1}\) in the short run. e. Calculate the firm's total costs as a function of \(q, w, v\) and \(k_{1}\) f. Given \(q, w,\) and \(v,\) how should the capital stock be chosen to minimize total cost? g. Use your results from part (f) to calculate the long-run total cost of hockey stick production. h. For \(w=\$ 4, v=\$ 1,\) graph the long-run total cost curve for hockey stick production. Show that this is an envelope for the short-run curves computed in part (e) by examining values of \(k_{1}\) of \(100,200,\) and 400

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free