Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In Example 7.3 we showed that a person with a CARA utility function who faces a Normally distributed risk will have expected utility of the form \(E[U(W)]=\mu_{W}-(A / 2) \sigma_{W}^{2},\) where \(\mu_{W}\) is the expected value of wealth and \(\sigma_{W}^{2}\) is its variance. Use this fact to solve for the optimal portfolio allocation for a person with a CARA utility function who must invest \(k\) of his or her wealth in a Normally distributed risky asset whose expected return is \(\mu_{r}\) and variance in return is \(\sigma_{r}^{2}\) (your answer should depend on \(A\) ). Explain your results intuitively.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The optimal amount to invest in the risky asset (k) can be calculated using the formula \(k = \frac{\mu_{r}}{A\sigma_{r}^{2}}\), where \(\mu_{r}\) is the expected return of the risky asset, \(A\) is the person's risk aversion constant, and \(\sigma_{r}^{2}\) is the variance in the return of the risky asset.

Step by step solution

01

Write down the wealth equation

The person's wealth (\(W\)) can be expressed as the sum of their initial wealth minus the amount invested in the risky asset and the returns from the risky investment. This can be written as: \(W = W_{0} - k + kR\), where \(W_{0}\) is the initial wealth, \(k\) is the amount invested in the risky asset, and \(R\) is the returns from the risky investment.
02

Calculate expected value and variance of wealth

We need to calculate the expected value (\(\mu_{W}\)) and variance (\(\sigma_{W}^{2}\)) of wealth. The expected value of wealth is given by: \(\mu_{W}=E[W]=W_{0}-k+k\mu_{r}\), where \(\mu_{r}\) is the expected return from the risky asset. The variance of wealth is given by: \(\sigma_{W}^{2}=Var[W]=(k\sigma_{r})^{2}=\sigma_{r}^{2}k^{2}\), where \(\sigma_{r}^{2}\) is the variance in return of the risky asset.
03

Calculate expected utility

Plug in the expected value and variance of wealth into the equation for expected utility: \(E[U(W)] = \mu_{W} - (A / 2) \sigma_{W}^{2} = (W_{0} - k + k\mu_{r}) - (A / 2)(\sigma_{r}^{2}k^{2})\)
04

Maximize expected utility with respect to k

Now, we need to find the optimal investment amount \(k\) that maximizes expected utility. To do this, differentiate \(E[U(W)]\) with respect to \(k\) and set the derivative equal to zero: \(\frac{\partial E[U(W)]}{\partial k} = \mu_{r} - Ak\sigma_{r}^{2} = 0 \)
05

Solve for optimal k

Solve the equation for optimal investment amount \(k\): \(k = \frac{\mu_{r}}{A\sigma_{r}^{2}}\)
06

Interpret the result

The optimal amount to invest in the risky asset (\(k\)) depends on the expected return of the risky asset (\(\mu_{r}\)), the person's risk aversion constant (\(A\)), and the variance in return of the risky asset (\(\sigma_{r}^{2}\)). This result intuitively makes sense because as the expected return increases, the person would want to invest more in the risky asset. However, as the risk aversion increases or the variance in return increases, the person would want to invest less in the risky asset to protect their wealth from the potential downside.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

CARA Utility Function
The CARA (Constant Absolute Risk Aversion) utility function is a tool used to measure an investor’s risk tolerance. It expresses the idea that an individual's dislike for losing a dollar is constant, regardless of how wealthy they are. In mathematical terms, the utility of wealth is given by a negative exponential function:
\( U(W) = -\frac{e^{-AW}}{A} \)
where \( A \) is a parameter that represents the degree of risk aversion: a higher \( A \) implies more risk aversion. The beauty of the CARA utility function lies in its simplicity and in the fact that it leads to decision-making that is independent of wealth levels. This characteristic makes it a useful tool for analyzing investment choices where risk and return are balanced.
Normal Distribution
In finance and statistics, the normal distribution is a continuous probability distribution that is symmetrical around the mean, meaning that it depicts that the occurrence rates of values near the mean are higher as compared to those far from the mean.

It is defined by two parameters: the mean \( \mu \) which indicates the center of the distribution, and the variance \( \sigma^2 \) which measures the spread or dispersion of the distribution. When an investment’s returns are normally distributed, it simplifies the risk analysis, allowing for straightforward calculations of expected values and variance. In the context of investment decisions, assuming normal distribution for asset returns is a common practice, although real-life returns can sometimes deviate from this model.
Expected Utility
Expected utility is a key concept in economics and finance that represents the average utility an investor expects to achieve from a portfolio. It’s calculated by taking into account the utility of all possible outcomes, each weighted by its probability. The formula for expected utility given a CARA utility function and normally distributed returns simplifies to:

\( E[U(W)] = \mu_W - \frac{A}{2} \sigma_W^2 \)

where \( \mu_W \) is the expected value of wealth and \( \sigma_W^2 \) is the variance of wealth. Expected utility is used to evaluate the desirability of portfolios with different risk-return profiles. Investors aim to maximize this quantity within their risk tolerance constraints, leading to different optimal portfolio allocations.
Investment Risk Analysis
Investment risk analysis is the process of identifying and assessing the risks associated with investing. It involves analyzing the probability of different investment outcomes and their potential impact on an investor’s wealth.
Key tools in risk analysis include the expected return and the variance or standard deviation of returns, which measure the average outcome and the uncertainty or risk of the investment, respectively.

By using the CARA utility function, investors can quantify their risk aversion and determine the optimal investment that maximizes expected utility given the trade-off between risk and return. The solution to the problem highlights that with a CARA utility function, the optimal investment level \( k \) in a risky asset is inversely proportional to the product of risk aversion \( A \) and the variance of the asset's return \( \sigma_r^2 \). This illustrates the balance investors seek between their desire for higher returns and their tolerance for risk in their portfolio allocation decisions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In deciding to park in an illegal place, any individual knows that the probability of getting a ticket is \(p\) and that the fine for receiving the ticket is \(f\). Suppose that all individuals are risk averse (i.e., \(U^{\prime \prime}(W)<0\), where \(W\) is the individual's wealth). Will a proportional increase in the probability of being caught or a proportional increase in the fine be a more effective deterrent to illegal parking? Hint: Use the Taylor series approximation \(U(W-f)=U(W)-f U^{\prime}(W)+\left(f^{2} / 2\right) U^{\prime \prime}(W)\)

Show that if an individual's utility-of-wealth function is convex then he or she will prefer fair gambles to income certainty and may even be willing to accept somewhat unfair gambles. Do you believe this sort of risk-taking behavior is common? What factors might tend to limit its occurrence?

Two pioneers of the field of behavioral economics, Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky (winners of the Nobel Prize in economics in 2002 , conducted an experiment in which they presented different groups of subjects with one of the following two scenarios: Scenario 1: In addition to \(\$ 1,000\) up front, the subject must choose between two gambles. Gamble \(A\) offers an even chance of winning \(\$ 1,000\) or nothing. Gamble \(B\) provides \(\$ 500\) with certainty. Scenario 2: In addition to \(\$ 2,000\) given up front, the subject must choose between two gambles. Gamble \(C\) offers an even chance of losing \(\$ 1,000\) or nothing. Gamble \(D\) results in the loss of \(\$ 500\) with certainty. a. Suppose Standard Stan makes choices under uncertainty according to expected utility theory. If Stan is risk neutral, what choice would he make in each scenario? b. What choice would Stan make if he is risk averse? c. Kahneman and Tversky found 16 percent of subjects chose \(A\) in the first scenario and 68 percent chose \(C\) in the second scenario. Based on your preceding answers, explain why these findings are hard to reconcile with expected utility theory. d. Kahneman and Tversky proposed an alternative to expected utility theory, called prospect theory, to explain the experimental results. The theory is that people's current income level functions as an "anchor point" for them. They are risk averse over gains beyond this point but sensitive to small losses below this point. This sensitivity to small losses is the opposite of risk aversion: \(A\) risk-averse person suffers disproportionately more from a large than a small loss. (1) Prospect Pete makes choices under uncertainty according to prospect theory. What choices would he make in Kahneman and Tversky's experiment? Explain. (2) Draw a schematic diagram of a utility curve over money for Prospect Pete in the first scenario. Draw a utility curve for him in the second scenario. Can the same curve suffice for both scenarios, or must it shift? How do Pete's utility curves differ from the ones we are used to drawing for people like Standard \(\operatorname{Stan} ?\)

A farmer believes there is a \(50-50\) chance that the next growing season will be abnormally rainy. His expected utility function has the form \\[ \text { expected utility }=\frac{1}{2} \ln Y_{N R}+\frac{1}{2} \ln Y_{R} \\] where \(Y_{N R}\) and \(Y_{R}\) represent the farmer's income in the states of "normal rain" and "rainy," respectively. a. Suppose the farmer must choose between two crops that promise the following income prospects: $$\begin{array}{lcc} \text { Crop } & Y_{N R} & Y_{R} \\ \hline \text { Wheat } & \$ 28,000 & \$ 10,000 \\ \text { Corn } & \$ 19,000 & \$ 15,000 \end{array}$$ Which of the crops will he plant? b. Suppose the farmer can plant half his field with each crop. Would he choose to do so? Explain your result. c. What mix of wheat and corn would provide maximum expected utility to this farmer? d. Would wheat crop insurance-which is available to farmers who grow only wheat and which costs \(\$ 4,000\) and pays off \(\$ 8,000\) in the event of a rainy growing season-cause this farmer to change what he plants?

Suppose there is a \(50-50\) chance that a risk-averse individual with a current wealth of \(\$ 20,000\) will contract a debilitating disease and suffer a loss of \(\$ 10,000\) a. Calculate the cost of actuarially fair insurance in this situation and use a utility-of-wealth graph (such as shown in Figure 7.1 ) to show that the individual will prefer fair insurance against this loss to accepting the gamble uninsured. b. Suppose two types of insurance policies were available: (1) a fair policy covering the complete loss; and (2) a fair policy covering only half of any loss incurred. Calculate the cost of the second type of policy and show that the individual will generally regard it as inferior to the first.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free