Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that a person regards ham and cheese as pure complements-he or she will always use one slice of ham in combination with one slice of cheese to make a ham and cheese sandwich. Suppose also that ham and cheese are the only goods that this person buys and that bread is free. a. If the price of ham is equal to the price of cheese, show that the own- price elasticity of demand for ham is -0.5 and that the cross-price elasticity of demand for ham with respect to the price of cheese is also -0.5 b. Explain why the results from part (a) reflect only income effects, not substitution effects. What are the compensated price elasticities in this problem? c. Use the results from part (b) to show how your answers to part (a) would change if a slice of ham cost twice the price of a slice of cheese. d. Explain how this problem could be solved intuitively by assuming this person consumes only one good-a ham and cheese sandwich.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The own-price elasticity of demand for ham is -0.5, and the cross-price elasticity of demand for ham with respect to the price of cheese is -0.5. b. Why do these results only show income effects? What are the compensated price elasticities? These results only show income effects because there are no substitution effects since the consumer only consumes ham and cheese together and cannot substitute one good for the other. The calculated elasticities only reflect income effects, as an increase in the price of one good affects the consumer's overall purchasing power, causing them to reduce their consumption of ham and cheese. The compensated price elasticities would be zero, as there would be no change in consumption if the consumer was compensated for the price increase. c. How would the results change if a slice of ham costs twice the price of a slice of cheese? If a slice of ham costs twice the price of a slice of cheese, the own-price and cross-price elasticities of demand for ham would both be -0.75. d. How can this problem be solved intuitively by considering a single good - a ham and cheese sandwich? When considering only one good - a ham and cheese sandwich, the own-price elasticity of demand for the sandwich is -1. This simplified and intuitive solution indicates that if the price of a ham and cheese sandwich increases by 1%, the consumption of sandwiches decreases by 1%.

Step by step solution

01

a. Own-price and cross-price elasticities of demand

To find the own-price elasticity of demand for ham, we use the formula: Own-price elasticity of demand (E) = (% change in quantity demanded) / (% change in price) Let's denote the price of ham as P_h, the price of cheese as P_c, and the quantity demanded of both ham (Q_h) and cheese (Q_c). Since the consumer always uses one slice of ham with one slice of cheese, we know that Q_h = Q_c. Now, if the price of ham increases by 1%, the cost of making a sandwich increases by 0.5% (since bread is free). The consumer's budget constraint is now tighter, and they must decrease their consumption by 0.5% to maintain the same-level consumption. Thus, the percentage change in quantity demanded of ham is -0.5%. E_own = (-0.5%) / (1%) = -0.5 Similarly, for the cross-price elasticity of demand for ham with respect to the price of cheese, we follow the same process and find that when the price of cheese increases by 1%, consumers reduce their demand for ham by 0.5%. This gives us: E_cross = (-0.5%)/ (1%) = -0.5
02

b. Income effects and compensated price elasticities

In this problem, there are no substitution effects, because the consumer only consumes ham and cheese together. Thus, they cannot substitute one good for the other. The calculated elasticities only reflect income effects, as an increase in the price of one good affects the consumer's overall purchasing power, causing them to reduce their consumption of ham and cheese. The compensated price elasticities in this problem would be zero, as there would be no change in consumption if the consumer was compensated for the price increase. They would continue to consume the same amount of ham and cheese sandwiches as before.
03

c. Changes when a slice of ham costs twice the price of cheese

If a slice of ham costs twice the price of a slice of cheese, we need to revisit the budget constraint. If we let P_c = 2P_h, the cost of making a sandwich is now 1.5 times more expensive when the price of ham increases by 1%. The percentage change in quantity demanded of ham would be now -0.75%. Own-price elasticity of demand: E_own = (-0.75%) / (1%) = -0.75 Cross-price elasticity of demand: E_cross = (-0.75%) / (1%) = -0.75 In this case, both the own-price and cross-price elasticities of demand for ham are -0.75.
04

d. Intuitive solution considering one good

We can simplify the problem by considering only one good: a ham and cheese sandwich. In this case, we only need to find the own-price elasticity of demand for the sandwich. Let the new prices be P_h_new = 2P_c_new. With this constraint, if the price of a ham and cheese sandwich increases by 1%, the consumer's purchasing power is reduced, and they must reduce their consumption of sandwiches. Assuming linear demand, this will result in a decrease in sandwich consumption by 1%. Own-price elasticity of demand for the combined good (sandwich): E_s = (-1%) / (1%) = -1 This intuitive solution demonstrates that when considering only a single good (the ham and cheese sandwich), the own-price elasticity of demand is -1, which is different from the previous parts of the exercise, where we calculated it separately for ham and cheese.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

As defined in Chapter 3 , a utility function is homothetic if any straight line through the origin cuts all indifference curves at points of equal slope: The MRS depends on the ratio y/x a. Prove that, in this case, x/I is constant. b. Prove that if an individual's tastes can be represented by a homothetic indifference map then price and quantity must move in opposite directions; that is, prove that Giffen's paradox cannot occur.

corresponding share elasticities. a. Show that the elasticity of a good's budget share with respect to income (esx,I=sx/II/sx) is equal to ex,I1. Interpret this conclusion with a few numerical examples. b. Show that the elasticity of a good's budget share with respect to its own price (ess,px=sx/pxpx/sx) is equal to ex,px+1. Again, interpret this finding with a few numerical examples. c. Use your results from part (b) to show that the "expenditure elasticity" of good x with respect to its own price [expa,pa=(pxx)/px1/x] is also equal to ex,px+1 d. Show that the elasticity of a good's budget share with respect to a change in the price of some other good (esx,py=sx/pypy/sx) is equal to ex,py c. In the Extensions to Chapter 4 we showed that with a CES utility function, the share of income devoted to good x is given by sx=1/(1+pykpxk), where k=δ/(δ1)=1σ. Use this share equation to prove Equation 5.56;ex,px=(1sx)σ Hint: This problem can be simplified by assuming px=py in which case sx=0.5

David N. gets $3 per week as an allowance to spend any way he pleases. Because he likes only peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, he spends the entire amount on peanut butter (at $0.05 per ounce) and jelly (at $0.10 per ounce). Bread is provided free of charge by a concerned neighbor. David is a particular eater and makes his sandwiches with exactly 1 ounce of jelly and 2 ounces of peanut butter. He is set in his ways and will never change these proportions. a. How much peanut butter and jelly will David buy with his $3 allowance in a week? b. Suppose the price of jelly were to increase to $0.15 an ounce. How much of each commodity would be bought? c. By how much should David's allowance be increased to compensate for the increase in the price of jelly in part (b)? d. Graph your results in parts (a) to (c). e. In what sense does this problem involve only a single commodity, peanut butter and jelly sandwiches? Graph the demand curve for this single commodity. f. Discuss the results of this problem in terms of the income and substitution effects involved in the demand for jelly.

Thirsty Ed drinks only pure spring water, but he can purchase it in two different-sized containers: 0.75 liter and 2 liter. Because the water itself is identical, he regards these two "goods" as perfect substitutes. a. Assuming Ed's utility depends only on the quantity of water consumed and that the containers themselves yield no utility, express this utility function in terms of quantities of 0.75 -liter containers (x) and 2 -liter containers (y) b. State Ed's demand function for x in terms of px,py and I c. Graph the demand curve for x, holding I and py constant. d. How do changes in I and py shift the demand curve for x ? e. What would the compensated demand curve for x look like in this situation?

The general form for the expenditure function of the almost ideal demand system (AIDS) is given by lnE(p1,,pn,U)=a0+i=1nαilnpi+12i=1nj=1nγijlnpilnpj+Uβ0i=1kpkβk For analytical ease, assume that the following restrictions apply:For analytical ease, assume that the following restrictions apply: γij=γji,i=1nαi=1, and j=1nγij=k=1nβk=0 a. Derive the AIDS functional form for a two-goods case. b. Given the previous restrictions, show that this expenditure function is homogeneous of degree 1 in all prices. This, along with the fact that this function resembles closely the actual data, makes it an "ideal" function. c. Using the fact that sx=dlnEdlnpx (see Problem 5.8 ), calculate the income share of each of the two goods.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free