Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Price indifference curves are iso-utility curves with the prices of two goods on the \(X\) - and \(Y\) -axes, respectively. Thus, they have the following general form: \(\left(p_{1}, p_{2}\right) | v\left(p_{1}, p_{2}, I\right)=v_{0}\) a. Derive the formula for the price indifference curves for the Cobb-Douglas case with \(\alpha=\beta=0.5 .\) Sketch one of them. b. What does the slope of the curve show? c. What is the direction of increasing utility in your graph?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the given step-by-step solution, the correct short answer for this topic would be: When α = β = 0.5 in a Cobb-Douglas utility function, the corresponding price indifference curve equation can be derived as \(\frac{I - p_2y}{p_1} \cdot y = v_0^2\). Graphing the indifference curves gives us a concave shape with a negative slope, indicating that the consumer has to trade-off between the consumption of goods 1 and 2 in order to maintain the same level of utility. The direction of increasing utility on the graph is up and to the right, showing that consuming more of both goods maximizes the consumer's utility.

Step by step solution

01

Cobb-Douglas Utility Function and Budget Equation

In the Cobb-Douglas case, the utility function is given by: \(U(x,y) = x^\alpha \cdot y^\beta\). Since, \(\alpha = \beta = 0.5\), the utility function becomes, \(U(x,y) = x^{0.5} \cdot y^{0.5}\) The budget equation is given by: \(p_1x + p_2y = I\)
02

Solving for x and y

In order to derive the price indifference curve, we first need to solve for x and y in terms of the budget equation. Rearranging the budget equation for x, we get: \(x = \frac{I - p_2y}{p_1}\) Now, plug the value of x into the utility function: \(U(x,y) = (\frac{I - p_2y}{p_1})^{0.5} \cdot y^{0.5}\) Now, we need to find the equation that represents the indifference curve, which is represented by \(v(x,y,I)=v_0\).
03

Deriving the Price Indifference Curve Equation

Rewrite the utility function as: \(v(x,y,I)= (\frac{I - p_2y}{p_1})^{0.5} \cdot y^{0.5}=v_0\) Now, solve it for \(v(x,y,I)=v_0\), and we get: \((\frac{I - p_2y}{p_1})^{0.5} \cdot y^{0.5}=v_0\) Square both sides of the equation to eliminate the square root, \(\frac{I - p_2y}{p_1} \cdot y = v_0^2\) Now, we have an equation that represents price indifference curves.
04

Sketch the Price Indifference Curve

To sketch one of the price indifference curves, we can take the above equation and substitute some fixed value for \(v_{0}\): \(\frac{I - p_2y}{p_1} \cdot y= v_0^2\) Upon sketching the graph with x and y axes representing the quantities of good 1 and good 2, we would get a curve with a negative slope, intercepting the axes, and having a concave shape.
05

Analyze the Slope of the Price Indifference Curve

The slope of the price indifference curve represents the ratio of prices of the two goods. The negative slope of the curve means that in order to achieve the same level of utility, the consumer must trade-off between the consumption of goods 1 and 2. A steeper slope indicates that good 1 is relatively more expensive than good 2. On the curve, the tangent represents the Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS), showing how many units of good 2 one is willing to give up for an additional unit of good 1 in order to maintain the same utility level.
06

Determine the Direction of Increasing Utility

On the graph of the price indifference curve, the direction of increasing utility is indicated by the direction that moves towards higher price indifference curves. Since the curves have a negative slope and are concave, the direction of increasing utility would be moving up and to the right, indicating that the consumer would maximize their utility by consuming more of both goods.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

corresponding share elasticities. a. Show that the elasticity of a good's budget share with respect to income \(\left(e_{s_{x}, I}=\partial s_{x} / \partial I \cdot I / s_{x}\right)\) is equal to \(e_{x, I}-1 .\) Interpret this conclusion with a few numerical examples. b. Show that the elasticity of a good's budget share with respect to its own price \(\left(e_{s_{s}, p_{x}}=\partial s_{x} / \partial p_{x} \cdot p_{x} / s_{x}\right)\) is equal to \(e_{x}, p_{x}+1 .\) Again, interpret this finding with a few numerical examples. c. Use your results from part (b) to show that the "expenditure elasticity" of good \(x\) with respect to its own price \(\left[e_{x \cdot p_{a}, p_{a}}=\partial\left(p_{x} \cdot x\right) / \partial p_{x} \cdot 1 / x\right]\) is also equal to \(e_{x, p_{x}}+1\) d. Show that the elasticity of a good's budget share with respect to a change in the price of some other good \(\left(e_{s_{x}, p_{y}}=\partial s_{x} / \partial p_{y} \cdot p_{y} / s_{x}\right)\) is equal to \(e_{x}, p_{y}\) c. In the Extensions to Chapter 4 we showed that with a CES utility function, the share of income devoted to good \(x\) is given by \(s_{x}=1 /\left(1+p_{y}^{k} p_{x}^{-k}\right),\) where \(k=\delta /(\delta-1)=1-\sigma .\) Use this share equation to prove Equation \(5.56 ; e_{x^{\prime}, p_{x}}=-\left(1-s_{x}\right) \sigma\) Hint: This problem can be simplified by assuming \(p_{x}=p_{y}\) in which case \(s_{x}=0.5\)

Thirsty Ed drinks only pure spring water, but he can purchase it in two different-sized containers: 0.75 liter and 2 liter. Because the water itself is identical, he regards these two "goods" as perfect substitutes. a. Assuming Ed's utility depends only on the quantity of water consumed and that the containers themselves yield no utility, express this utility function in terms of quantities of 0.75 -liter containers \((x)\) and 2 -liter containers \((y)\) b. State Ed's demand function for \(x\) in terms of \(p_{x}, p_{y}\) and \(I\) c. Graph the demand curve for \(x\), holding \(I\) and \(p_{y}\) constant. d. How do changes in \(I\) and \(p_{y}\) shift the demand curve for \(x\) ? e. What would the compensated demand curve for \(x\) look like in this situation?

The general form for the expenditure function of the almost ideal demand system (AIDS) is given by $$\ln E\left(p_{1}, \ldots, p_{n}, U\right)=a_{0}+\sum_{i=1}^{n} \alpha_{i} \ln p_{i}+\frac{1}{2} \sum_{i=1}^{n} \sum_{j=1}^{n} \gamma_{i j} \ln p_{i} \ln p_{j}+U \beta_{0} \prod_{i=1}^{k} p_{k}^{\beta_{k}}$$ For analytical ease, assume that the following restrictions apply:For analytical ease, assume that the following restrictions apply: $$\gamma_{i j}=\gamma_{j i}, \quad \sum_{i=1}^{n} \alpha_{i}=1, \quad \text { and } \quad \sum_{j=1}^{n} \gamma_{i j}=\sum_{k=1}^{n} \beta_{k}=0$$ a. Derive the AIDS functional form for a two-goods case. b. Given the previous restrictions, show that this expenditure function is homogeneous of degree 1 in all prices. This, along with the fact that this function resembles closely the actual data, makes it an "ideal" function. c. Using the fact that \(s_{x}=\frac{d \ln E}{d \ln p_{x}}\) (see Problem 5.8 ), calculate the income share of each of the two goods.

Show that the share of income spent on a good \(x\) is \(s_{x}=\frac{d \ln E}{d \ln p_{x}},\) where \(E\) is total expenditure.

Suppose that a person regards ham and cheese as pure complements-he or she will always use one slice of ham in combination with one slice of cheese to make a ham and cheese sandwich. Suppose also that ham and cheese are the only goods that this person buys and that bread is free. a. If the price of ham is equal to the price of cheese, show that the own- price elasticity of demand for ham is -0.5 and that the cross-price elasticity of demand for ham with respect to the price of cheese is also -0.5 b. Explain why the results from part (a) reflect only income effects, not substitution effects. What are the compensated price elasticities in this problem? c. Use the results from part (b) to show how your answers to part (a) would change if a slice of ham cost twice the price of a slice of cheese. d. Explain how this problem could be solved intuitively by assuming this person consumes only one good-a ham and cheese sandwich.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free