Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Find utility functions given each of the following indifference curves [defined by \(U(')=k]\) a \(z=\frac{k^{1 / 8}}{x^{a / b} y^{4 / 8}}\) b. \(y=0.5 \sqrt{x^{2}-4\left(x^{2}-k\right)}-0.5 x\) \(c_{1} z=\frac{\sqrt{y^{4}-4 x\left(x^{2} y-k\right)}}{2 x}-\frac{y^{2}}{2 x}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The utility functions for each indifference curve are: a) \(U(x, y, z) = \left(z x^{\alpha / \delta} y^{\beta / \delta}\right)^\delta\) b) \(U(x, y) = x^2 - \frac{1}{4}(y + 0.5 x)^2\) c) \(U(x, y, z) = x^2y - \frac{1}{4}\left(\left(2xz + y^2\right)^2 - y^4\right)\)

Step by step solution

01

Function a: Solving for utility function from the given indifference curve

Given the indifference curve: $$ z=\frac{k^{1 / \delta}}{x^{\alpha / \delta} y^{\beta / \delta}}$$ We want to find the utility function when given this indifference curve. To do so, we first need to have the equation with \(k\) representing the utility function. Rearrange the equation to make \(k\) the subject: $$k = \left(z x^{\alpha / \delta} y^{\beta / \delta}\right)^\delta$$ Now, let's denote the utility function as \(U(x, y, z)\). Then, the utility function can be expressed as: $$U(x, y, z) = \left(z x^{\alpha / \delta} y^{\beta / \delta}\right)^\delta$$
02

Function b: Solving for utility function from the given indifference curve

Given the indifference curve: $$ y=0.5 \sqrt{x^{2}-4\left(x^{2}-k\right)}-0.5 x$$ Rearrange the equation to solve for \(k\): $$k = x^2 - \frac{1}{4}(y + 0.5 x)^2$$ Now, let's denote the utility function as \(U(x, y)\). Then, the utility function can be expressed as: $$U(x, y) = x^2 - \frac{1}{4}(y + 0.5 x)^2$$
03

Function c: Solving for utility function from the given indifference curve

Given the indifference curve: $$ z=\frac{\sqrt{y^{4}-4 x\left(x^{2} y-k\right)}}{2 x}-\frac{y^{2}}{2 x}$$ Rearrange the equation to solve for \(k\): $$k = x^2y - \frac{1}{4}\left(\left(2xz + y^2\right)^2 - y^4\right)$$ Now, let's denote the utility function as \(U(x, y, z)\). Then, the utility function can be expressed as: $$U(x, y, z) = x^2y - \frac{1}{4}\left(\left(2xz + y^2\right)^2 - y^4\right)$$

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Utility Maximization
Utility maximization refers to the assumption in economics that individuals prefer to choose the combination of goods and services that provides them with the highest level of satisfaction, or utility, subject to their budget constraints. When consumers make purchasing decisions, they weigh the additional satisfaction (marginal utility) they might gain from consuming an extra unit of a good against the opportunity cost of that decision, which is typically the price of the good.

For example, in the textbook exercise, utility maximization would involve finding the combination of goods x, y, and z that maximizes the utility functions derived from the given indifference curves. Students can improve their grasp of this concept by visualizing the process as trying to find the highest indifference curve that they can reach while still remaining within their budget line. This might include activities like drawing graphs to depict the indifference curves and budget constraints, or using mathematical optimization techniques where they calculate the marginal utility per dollar spent on each good to find the optimal consumption bundle.
Consumer Theory
Consumer theory is a branch of microeconomics that studies how people decide what to purchase with their limited resources to maximize their utility. It incorporates the concept of indifference curves, which are graphs representing different combinations of two goods that provide the same level of satisfaction to the consumer. These curves help in understanding consumer preferences and are foundational in deducing demand curves.

In the given exercise, the indifference curves were described by specific functional forms, and the task was to derive the utility functions to better understand consumer choices. To better understand consumer theory, students are advised to not only focus on the algebra but to also consider the real-world implications. For example, understanding that a consumer would be indifferent between various combinations of goods x and y for a given level of utility (k) helps in realizing why consumers might substitute one good for another as prices change.
Microeconomic Models
Microeconomic models are simplified representations of real economic processes that help economists and students analyze and predict how individuals and firms will behave in a variety of circumstances. These models can range from simple supply and demand graphs to more complex mathematical models. They often use a set of assumptions to focus on specific economic variables and their interactions.

The exercise presented is an example of a microeconomic model that demonstrates how different utility functions can describe consumer behavior. In developing their microeconomic models, students could incorporate the exercise improvement suggestion by examining how changes in the parameters of the utility functions, like a, b, and k, could alter the shape of indifference curves and thus, consumer decision-making. Through this, learners gain insight into the predictive power of microeconomic models and how they can be used to understand and forecast the impact of economic changes on individual consumption choices.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The formal study of preferences uses a general vector notation. A bundle of \(n\) commoditics is denoted by the vector \(\mathbf{x}=\left(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\right),\) and a preference relation \((>)\) is defined over all potential bundles. The statement \(\mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{2}\) means that bundle \(\mathbf{x}^{1}\) is preferred to bundle \(\mathbf{x}^{2}\). Indifference between two such bundles is denoted by \(\mathbf{x}^{1} \approx \mathbf{x}^{2}\) The preference relation is "complete" if for any two bundles the individual is able to state cither \(\mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{2}, \mathbf{x}^{2}>\mathbf{x}^{1}\), or \(\mathbf{x}^{1} \approx\) \(\mathbf{x}^{2}\). The relation is "transitive" if \(\mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{2}\) and \(\mathbf{x}^{2}>\mathbf{x}^{3}\) implies that \(\mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{3}\), Finally, a preference relation is "continuous" if for any bundle \(y\) such that \(y>x\), any bundle suitably close to \(y\) will also be preferred to \(x\). Using these definitions, discuss whether each of the following preference relations is complete, transitive, and continuous. a Summation preferences: This preference relation assumes one can indeed add apples and oranges. Specifically, \(\mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{2}\) if and only if \(\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{1}>\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{2} .\) If \(\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{1}=\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{2}, \mathbf{x}^{1} \approx \mathbf{x}^{2}\) b. Lexicographic preferences: In this case the preference relation is organized as a dictionary: If \(x_{1}^{1}>x_{1}^{2}, x^{1} \succ x^{2}\) (regardless of the amounts of the other \(n-1\) goods). If \(x_{1}^{1}=x_{1}^{2}\) and \(x_{2}^{1}>x_{2}^{2}, x^{1}>x^{2}\) (regardless of the amounts of the other \(n-2\) goods). The lexicographic preference relation then continues in this way throughout the entire list of goods. c. Preferences with satiation: For this preference relation there is assumed to be a consumption bundle (x") that provides complete "bliss." The ranking of all other bundles is determined by how close they are to \(\mathbf{x}^{*}\), That is, \(\mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{2}\) if and only if \\[ \left|\mathbf{x}^{1}-\mathbf{x}^{*}\right|<\left|\mathbf{x}^{2}-\mathbf{x}^{\prime}\right| \text { where }\left|\mathbf{x}^{l}-\mathbf{x}^{*}\right|=\sqrt{\left(x_{1}^{\prime}-x_{1}^{*}\right)^{2}+\left(x_{2}^{\prime}-x_{x}^{*}\right)^{2}+\ldots+\left(x_{n}^{\prime}-x_{n}^{*}\right)^{2}} \\]

Example 3.3 shows that the \(M R S\) for the Cobb-Douglas function \\[ U(x, y)=x^{a} y^{\beta} \\] is given by \\[ M R S=\frac{\alpha}{\beta}\left(\frac{y}{x}\right) \\] a Does this result depend on whether \(\alpha+\beta=1 ?\) Does this sum have any relevance to the theory of choice? b. For commodity bundles for which \(y=x\), how does the \(M R S\) depend on the values of \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) ? Develop an intuitive explanation of why, if \(\alpha>\beta, M R S>1 .\) Illustrate your argument with a graph. c. Suppose an individual obtains utility only from amounts of \(x\) and \(y\) that exceed minimal subsistence levels given by \(x_{0}, y_{0}\) In this case, \\[ U(x, y)=\left(x-x_{0}\right)^{a}\left(y-y_{0}\right)^{\beta} \\] Is this function homothetic? (For a further discussion, see the Extensions to Chapter \(4 .\) )

As we saw in Figure \(3.5,\) one way to show convexity of indifference curves is to show that, for any two points \(\left(x_{1}, y_{1}\right)\) and \(\left(x_{2}, y_{2}\right)\) on an indifference curve that promises \(U=k\), the utility associated with the point \(\left(\frac{x_{1}+x_{2}}{2}, \frac{y_{1}+y_{2}}{2}\right)\) is at least as great as \(k\). Use this approach to discuss the convexity of the indifference curves for the following three functions. Be sure to graph your results. a. \(U(x, y)=\min (x, y)\) b. \(U(x, y)=\max (x, y)\) c. \(U(x, y)=x+y\)

Two goods have independent marginal utilities if \\[ \frac{\partial^{2} U}{\partial y \partial x}=\frac{\partial^{2} U}{\partial x \partial y}=0 \\] Show that if we assume diminishing marginal utility for each good, then any utility function with independent marginal utilities will have a diminishing \(M R S\). Provide an example to show that the converse of this statement is not true.

The Phillie Phanatic (PP) always eats his ballpark franks in a special way; he uses a foot-long hot dog together with precisely half a bun, 1 ounce of mustard, and 2 ounces of pickle relish. His utility is a function only of these four items, and any extra amount of a single item without the other constituents is worthless. a. What form does PP's utility function for these four goods have? b. How might we simplify matters by considering PP's utility to be a function of only one good? What is that good? c. Suppose foot-long hot dogs cost \(\$ 1.00\) each, buns cost \(\$ 0.50\) each, mustard costs \(\$ 0.05\) per ounce, and pickle relish costs S0.15 per ounce. How much does the good defined in part (b) cost? d. If the price of foot-long hot dogs increases by 50 percent (to \(\$ 1.50\) each), what is the percentage increase in the price of the good? How would a 50 percent increase in the price of a bun affect the price of the good? Why is your answer different from part (d)? f. If the government wanted to raise \(\$ 1.00\) by taxing the goods that \(\mathrm{PP}\) buys, how should it spread this tax over the four goods so as to minimize the utility cost to PP?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free