Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

One of the most important functions we will encounter in this book is the Cobb-Douglas function: \\[ y=\left(x_{1}\right)^{\alpha}\left(x_{2}\right)^{\beta} \\] where \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) are positive constants that are each less than 1 a. Show that this function is quasi-concave using a "brute force" method by applying Equation 2.114 b. Show that the Cobb-Douglas function is quasi-concave by showing that any contour line of the form \(y=c\) (where \(c\) is any positive constant is convex and therefore that the set of points for which \(y>c\) is a convex set. c. Show that if \(\alpha+\beta>1\) then the Cobb-Douglas function is not concave (thereby illustrating again that not all quasiconcave functions are concave). Note: The Cobb-Douglas function is discussed further in the Extensions to this chapter.

Short Answer

Expert verified
**Answer**: Yes, the Cobb-Douglas function is quasi-concave. However, it is not concave when the condition α+β > 1 holds.

Step by step solution

01

a. Show that the Cobb-Douglas function is quasi-concave using the "brute force" method by applying Equation 2.114.

To show that the Cobb-Douglas function is quasi-concave, we can use the definition of a quasi-concave function given by Equation 2.114, which states that if for any two points \(x_1, x_2 \in X\) and any \(\lambda \in [0, 1]\), the following inequality holds: \\[ f(\lambda x_1 + (1-\lambda) x_2) \geq \min[f(x_1), f(x_2)] \\] We have the Cobb-Douglas function given by \(y=f(x_1,x_2)=(x_1)^{\alpha}(x_2)^{\beta}\), where \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) are positive constants that are each less than 1. Let's choose two points \(x_1 = (a_1, a_2)\) and \(x_2=(b_1, b_2)\) and consider \(\lambda \in [0, 1]\). We then have: \(f(x_1) = (a_1)^{\alpha}(a_2)^{\beta}\) and \(f(x_2) = (b_1)^{\alpha}(b_2)^{\beta}\) Now, we need to evaluate the function at the point given by \(\lambda x_1 + (1-\lambda)x_2=(a_1\lambda+b_1(1-\lambda),a_2\lambda+b_2(1-\lambda))\). We have: \(f(\lambda x_1+(1-\lambda) x_2)=((a_1\lambda+b_1(1-\lambda))^{\alpha}((a_2\lambda+b_2(1-\lambda))^{\beta}\). To satisfy the inequality of quasi-concave functions, we need to prove that: \(((a_1\lambda+b_1(1-\lambda))^{\alpha}((a_2\lambda+b_2(1-\lambda))^{\beta} \geq \min[f(x_1), f(x_2)]\) Using the fact that \(A^{\lambda}B^{1-\lambda} \geq \lambda A + (1-\lambda)B\) for positive A, B and \(\lambda \in [0, 1]\) (which can be proved using Jensen's inequality), we get: \(((a_1\lambda+b_1(1-\lambda))^{\alpha}((a_2\lambda+b_2(1-\lambda))^{\beta} \geq (\lambda a_1^{\alpha} + (1-\lambda) b_1^{\alpha})(\lambda a_2^{\beta} + (1-\lambda) b_2^{\beta})\) Now, notice that: \((\lambda a_1^{\alpha} + (1-\lambda) b_1^{\alpha})(\lambda a_2^{\beta} + (1-\lambda) b_2^{\beta}) \geq \min[f(x_1), f(x_2)]\) Therefore, the Cobb-Douglas function is quasi-concave.
02

b. Show that the Cobb-Douglas function is quasi-concave by showing that any contour line of the form y=c is convex and therefore the set of points for which y>c is a convex set.

This approach requires showing that the contour lines of the Cobb-Douglas function, given by \(y=c\), are convex and the set of points for which \(y>c\) is a convex set. Let's define the contour line of the Cobb-Douglas function as: \(y = (x_1)^{\alpha}(x_2)^{\beta} = c\) To show that this contour line is convex, we can use the Hessian matrix to check the property of the function. The Hessian matrix is given by: \(H = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{\partial^2y}{\partial x_1^2} & \frac{\partial^2y}{\partial x_1\partial x_2} \\ \frac{\partial^2y}{\partial x_2\partial x_1} & \frac{\partial^2y}{\partial x_2^2} \end{bmatrix}\) Taking the necessary second-order partial derivatives, we get: \(\frac{\partial^2y}{\partial x_1^2} = \alpha(\alpha-1)(x_1)^{\alpha-2}(x_2)^{\beta}\), \(\frac{\partial^2y}{\partial x_2^2} = \beta(\beta-1)(x_1)^{\alpha}(x_2)^{\beta-2}\), \(\frac{\partial^2y}{\partial x_1\partial x_2}=\frac{\partial^2y}{\partial x_2\partial x_1}=\alpha\beta(x_1)^{\alpha-1}(x_2)^{\beta-1}\). Thus, the Hessian matrix is: \(H = \begin{bmatrix} \alpha(\alpha-1)(x_1)^{\alpha-2}(x_2)^{\beta} & \alpha\beta(x_1)^{\alpha-1}(x_2)^{\beta-1} \\ \alpha\beta(x_1)^{\alpha-1}(x_2)^{\beta-1} & \beta(\beta-1)(x_1)^{\alpha}(x_2)^{\beta-2} \end{bmatrix}\) The function is convex if the Hessian matrix is positive semidefinite, meaning that its determinant is non-negative: \(\det(H) = \alpha^2\beta^2(x_1)^{2\alpha-2}(x_2)^{2\beta-2}-\alpha\beta(\alpha-1)(\beta-1)(x_1)^{2\alpha-2}(x_2)^{2\beta-2} \geq 0\) Notice that \(\alpha\beta(\alpha-1)(\beta-1) \leq \alpha^2\beta^2\) because \(\alpha, \beta < 1\), so the determinant of the Hessian is non-negative, and therefore, the Cobb-Douglas function is quasi-concave.
03

c. Show that if \(\alpha+\beta>1\) then the Cobb-Douglas function is not concave.

A function is concave if the negative of the function is convex. Let's check the conditions for the Cobb-Douglas function to be concave by considering the negative of this function: \(-y = -(x_1)^{\alpha}(x_2)^{\beta}\) Using the Hessian matrix of the negative function, we have: \(\frac{\partial^2(-y)}{\partial x_1^2} = \alpha(\alpha-1)(x_1)^{\alpha-2}(x_2)^{\beta}\), \(\frac{\partial^2(-y)}{\partial x_2^2} = \beta(\beta-1)(x_1)^{\alpha}(x_2)^{\beta-2}\), \(\frac{\partial^2(-y)}{\partial x_1\partial x_2}=\frac{\partial^2(-y)}{\partial x_2\partial x_1}=-\alpha\beta(x_1)^{\alpha-1}(x_2)^{\beta-1}\). The determinant of the Hessian matrix for the negative function is: \(\det(-H) = -\alpha^2\beta^2(x_1)^{2\alpha-2}(x_2)^{2\beta-2}+\alpha\beta(\alpha-1)(\beta-1)(x_1)^{2\alpha-2}(x_2)^{2\beta-2}\) Now, if \(\alpha+\beta>1\), then \(\alpha-1\) and \(\beta-1\) are positive values. Therefore, \(\det(-H) > 0\) for \(\alpha+\beta>1\), which means that the negative of the Cobb-Douglas function is not convex, and therefore, the original function is not concave under this condition.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Quasi-Concave Function
The concept of a quasi-concave function is particularly significant in economics, where it describes a preference pattern that is not necessarily equivalent to the standard notion of concavity. In simple terms, a function is quasi-concave if, for any two points within its domain, the function value at any linear combination of these points is at least as great as the minimum value of the function at these two points. This principle can be mathematically stated as:

For any two points \(x_1, x_2\) in the domain and any \(\lambda\) in the interval \([0, 1]\), the inequality\[ f(\lambda x_1 + (1-\lambda) x_2) \geq \min[f(x_1), f(x_2)]\]must hold. Intuitively, the set of all points where the function takes on a value greater than a certain level forms a convex set.

The Cobb-Douglas production function, given by \(y = (x_{1})^{\alpha}(x_{2})^{\beta}\), where \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) are positive constants less than 1, exhibits quasi-concave properties. This means that within the context of production, the outputs from a set of inputs will at least maintain a minimum output level when inputs are combined in different proportions.

This characteristic of the Cobb-Douglas function reflects the economic principle that consumers or producers can adapt input combinations without falling below a certain utility or production level, reflecting flexibility and adaptability in economic decisions.
Hessian Matrix
In multivariable calculus, the Hessian matrix is a square matrix of second-order partial derivatives of a scalar-valued function. It is instrumental in examining the local curvature of a function, especially with regard to optimization problems. Economists and mathematicians use the Hessian matrix to study the concavity or convexity of functions.

For a function \(y = f(x_1, x_2)\), the Hessian matrix is defined as:\[ H = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{\partial^2y}{\partial x_1^2} & \frac{\partial^2y}{\partial x_1\partial x_2} \ \frac{\partial^2y}{\partial x_2\partial x_1} & \frac{\partial^2y}{\partial x_2^2} \end{bmatrix}\]A function is considered convex if its Hessian matrix is positive semidefinite across its domain, which means that any leading principal minor of the Hessian is non-negative. In the context of the Cobb-Douglas function, the Hessian matrix helps confirm its quasi-concavity by indicating that its contour lines are convex sets.

Understanding the Hessian matrix is essential for various applications across economics, such as in consumer choice and production theory, where it is often used to verify the curvature properties of utility functions and production functions—information crucial for determining optimal behaviors and outcomes in microeconomic theory.
Concavity in Microeconomic Theory
Concavity plays a pivotal role in microeconomic theory, particularly in the analysis of consumer preferences and production technologies. A concave function indicates that as one adds more of an input, the incremental gain (or marginal return) from that input decreases, which aligns with the principle of diminishing returns.

In a concave function, the line segment between any two points on the function's graph lies below or on the graph, leading to a graphic representation that curves downwards. This property is crucial when examining production functions like the Cobb-Douglas function. However, when the sum of the exponents in a Cobb-Douglas function, such as \(\alpha + \beta\), exceeds 1, the function exhibits increasing returns to scale and is no longer concave. This scenario demonstrates that not all quasi-concave functions are concave, as quasi-concavity is a weaker condition that allows for a constant or increasing marginal rate of substitution or production.

In the realm of economics, concave utility and production functions represent realistic and rational behavior, underpinning many models and theories. The investigation into concavity of functions like Cobb-Douglas provides insights into resource allocation, cost minimization, and profit maximization strategies, all fundamental aspects of economic analysis and decision-making.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that a firm has a marginal cost function given by \(M C(q)=q+1\) What is this firm's total cost function? Explain why total costs are known only up to a constant of integration, which represents fixed costs. b. As you may know from an earlier economics course, if a firm takes price ( \(p\) ) as given in its decisions then it will produce that output for which \(p=M C(q)\). If the firm follows this profit-maximizing rule, how much will it produce when \(p=15 ?\) Assuming that the firm is just breaking even at this price, what are fixed costs? c. How much will profits for this firm increase if price increases to \(20 ?\) d. Show that, if we continue to assume profit maximization, then this firm's profits can be expressed solely as a function of the price it receives for its output. e. Show that the increase in profits from \(p=15\) to \(p=20\) can be calculated in two ways: (i) directly from the equation derived in part (d); and (ii) by integrating the inverse marginal cost function \(\left[M C^{-1}(p)=p-1\right]\) from \(p=15\) to \(p=20\) Explain this result intuitively using the envelope theorem.

Suppose that \(f(x, y)=x y .\) Find the maximum value for \(f\) if \(x\) and \(y\) are constrained to sum to \(1 .\) Solve this problem in two ways: by substitution and by using the Lagrange multiplier method.

Here are a few useful relationships related to the covariance of two random variables, \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) a show that \(\operatorname{Cov}\left(x_{1}, x_{2}\right)=E\left(x_{1} x_{2}\right)-E\left(x_{1}\right) E\left(x_{2}\right) .\) An important implication of this is that if \(\operatorname{Cov}\left(x_{1}, x_{2}\right)=0, E\left(x_{1} x_{2}\right)\) \(=E\left(x_{1}\right) E\left(x_{2}\right) .\) That is, the expected value of a product of two random variables is the product of these variables' expected values. b. Show that \(\operatorname{Var}\left(a x_{1}+b x_{2}\right)=a^{2} \operatorname{Var}\left(x_{1}\right)+b^{2} \operatorname{Var}\left(x_{2}\right)+2 a b \operatorname{Cov}\left(x_{1}, x_{2}\right)\) c. In Problem \(2.15 \mathrm{d}\) we looked at the variance of \(X=k x_{1}+(1-k) x_{2} \quad 0 \leq k \leq 1 .\) Is the conclusion that this variance is minimized for \(k=0.5\) changed by considering cases where \(\operatorname{Cov}\left(x_{1}, x_{2}\right) \neq 0 ?\) d. The correlation coefficient between two random variables is defined as \\[ \operatorname{Corr}\left(x_{1}, x_{2}\right)=\frac{\operatorname{Cov}\left(x_{1}, x_{2}\right)}{\sqrt{\operatorname{Var}\left(x_{1}\right) \operatorname{Var}\left(x_{2}\right)}} \\] Explain why \(-1 \leq \operatorname{Corr}\left(x_{1}, x_{2}\right) \leq 1\) and provide some intuition for this result. e. Suppose that the random variable \(y\) is related to the random variable \(x\) by the linear equation \(y=\alpha+\beta x\). Show that \\[ \beta=\frac{\operatorname{Cov}(y, x)}{\operatorname{Var}(x)} \\] Here \(\beta\) is sometimes called the (theoretical) regression coefficient of \(y\) on \(x\). With actual data, the sample analog of this expression is the ordinary least squares (OLS) regression coefficient.

Show that if \(f\left(x_{1}, x_{2}\right)\) is a concave function then it is also a quasi-concave function. Do this by comparing Equation 2.114 (defining quasi-concavity) with Equation 2.98 (defining concavity). Can you give an intuitive reason for this result? Is the converse of the statement true? Are quasi-concave functions necessarily concave? If not, give a counterexample.

Suppose \(U(x, y)=4 x^{2}+3 y^{2}\) a. Calculate \(\partial U / \partial x, \partial U / \partial y\) b. Evaluate these partial derivatives at \(x=1, y=2\) c. Write the total differential for \(U\) d. Calculate \(d y / d x\) for \(d U=0\) -that is, what is the implied trade-off between \(x\) and \(y\) holding \(U\) constant? e. Show \(U=16\) when \(x=1, y=2\) f. In what ratio must \(x\) and \(y\) change to hold \(U\) constant at 16 for movements away from \(x=1, y=2 ?\) g. More generally, what is the shape of the \(U=16\) contour line for this function? What is the slope of that line?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free