Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose demand for labor is given by \[ l=-50 w+450 \] and supply is given by \[ l=100 w \] where l represents the number of people employed and w is the real wage rate per hour. a. What will be the equilibrium levels for w and l in this market? b. Suppose the government wishes to increase the equilibrium wage to $4 per hour by offering a subsidy to employers for each person hired. How much will this subsidy have to be? What will the new equilibrium level of employment be? How much total subsidy will be paid? c. Suppose instead that the government declared a minimum wage of $4 per hour. How much labor would be demanded at this price? How much unemployment would there be? d. Graph your results.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The equilibrium wage (w) is $3 per hour, and the equilibrium employment level (l) is 300 people. b) How much is the subsidy needed to raise the wage to 4perhour,andwhatisthenewemploymentlevelandthetotalsubsidy?Therequiredsubsidyis$2.50perhour.Thenewemploymentlevelis150people,andthetotalsubsidypaymentis$375.c)Whatisthelabordemandandunemploymentlevelsifa$4perhourminimumwageisset?Thelabordemandata$4perhourminimumwageis250people.Theunemploymentlevelincreasesto50people.d)Howdothegraphschangeineachsituation?Plottheoriginaldemandandsupplycurvesonagraph,markingtheinitialequilibriumpoint(Eq)at\((w1,l1)=(3,300). Next, plot the adjusted supply curve with the subsidy (Shifted Supply) and the new equilibrium point (Eq') at (w2,l2)=(4,150). Lastly, draw a horizontal line at w=4, representing the minimum wage level, and mark the intersection point with the demand curve as (D') at \)(4, 250)$.

Step by step solution

01

Find the equilibrium levels for w and l

To find the equilibrium wage and the number of people employed, set the supply equation equal to the demand equation: \[ 100w = -50w + 450 \] Now, solve for w: \[ 150w = 450 \ w = \dfrac{450}{150} = 3 \] Next, find the equilibrium number of people employed l by substituting the value of w into either equation. Let's use the supply equation: \[ l = 100w = 100(3) = 300 \] The equilibrium levels for w and l are $3 and 300, respectively.
02

Calculate the subsidy to increase the wage to \(4 per hour

In order to raise the equilibrium wage to \)4 per hour, the government needs to offer a subsidy to employers. Denote the subsidy by s. The new supply equation becomes: \[ l = 100(w - s) \] Now, we want w to be equal to 4. So, we rewrite the equation as: \[ l = 100(4 - s) \] Now, set the demand equation and the adjusted supply equation equal to each other: \[ -50w + 450 = 100(4 - s) \] Substitute w=4: \[ -200 + 450 = 400 - 100s \ 100s= 250 \ s = 2.50 \] The needed subsidy is $2.50 per hour.
03

Determine the new equilibrium for employment and total subsidy

Substitute the subsidy value back into the adjusted supply equation: \[ l = 100(4 - 2.5) = 150 \] The new equilibrium level of employment is l=150. To calculate the total subsidy paid, multiply the subsidy rate by the number of people employed: \[ Total\ Subsidy = s \cdot l = 2.50 \cdot 150 = 375 \] The total subsidy to be paid by the government is $375.
04

Determine labor demand and unemployment with a \(4 per hour minimum wage

Calculate the labor demand at a minimum wage of \)4 per hour by using the demand equation: \[ l = -50(4) + 450 = 250 \] The labor demand at a $4 per hour wage is 250 people. To determine the level of unemployment, subtract the labor demand from the original equilibrium level of employment: \[ Unemployment = l - Labor \ Demand = 300 - 250 = 50 \] The unemployment level with a $4 per hour minimum wage is 50 people.
05

Graph the results

To graph the results, plot the original demand and supply curves, marking the initial equilibrium point (Eq) at (w1,l1)=(3,300). Plot the adjusted supply curve with the subsidy (Shifted Supply) and the new equilibrium point (Eq') at (w2,l2)=(4,150). Finally, denote the minimum wage level of 4perhourbyahorizontallineatw=4andfindwhereitintersectsthedemandcurve,markingthispoint(D)at(4, 250)$.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Supply and Demand
Supply and demand are two fundamental concepts in economics. They dictate the price and quantity of goods in the market.
In this scenario, labor is the good in focus. The supply function, l=100w, shows the relationship between the labor force's willingness to work at different wage rates.
The demand function, l=50w+450, shows how many workers employers are willing to hire at each wage level.
To find the market equilibrium, where supply equals demand, we set these equations equal.
  • From the above, equilibrium occurs when both suppliers (workers) and demanders (employers) agree on a wage rate and employment level.
  • At this point, there is no excess supply (unemployment) or demand (vacancies).
Finding this balance is key to understanding labor market dynamics.
Government Subsidy
A government subsidy in the labor market is financial support provided to employers. It encourages them to hire more workers than they usually would at given wage levels.
This exercise showcases how a subsidy affects the supply curve.
  • When a subsidy is introduced, the supply equation adjusts to account for the new financial support.
  • In this example, the government aims for a wage of \(4 by pushing the supply curve rightward.
  • To achieve an effective subsidy, solving 100s=250 reveals that \)2.50 per hour is needed.
Such policy adjustments aim to achieve higher employment, modifying market conditions creatively.
Minimum Wage
A minimum wage is a legally mandated lowest hourly wage that workers must be paid. It is designed to ensure a living wage.
When a minimum wage like $4 per hour, exceeds the equilibrium wage, various impacts emerge.
  • Here, the imposed minimum wage of $4 shifts the labor market conditions.
  • Employers will only demand 250 workers at this wage rate, based on the demand curve.
  • Such dynamics often result in discrepant labor demand and supply, leading to unemployment.
Thus, minimum wages aim to protect workers but must align with market realities to avoid adverse effects.
Unemployment
In labor economics, unemployment refers to the situation where labor supply exceeds labor demand.
This disparity often occurs when wages exceed equilibrium levels, like with a minimum wage enforcement.
  • As wages rise to $4, supply remains at 300 but demand dips to 250.
  • This gap results in an unemployment figure of 300250=50 extra workers wishing to work.
  • Unemployment points to inefficiencies where labor isn't fully utilized.
Addressing unemployment often requires nuanced policy interventions balancing wages and job availability effectively.
Equilibrium Wage Rate
The equilibrium wage rate is where labor supply equals labor demand in the market, ensuring full employment without excess supply or demand.
In our scenario, this rate was initially found at $3 per hour.
  • It signifies a natural market balance based on current economic conditions.
  • An equilibrium wage supports maximum efficiency in workforce allocation.
  • When external factors change (like subsidies or minimum wages), reaching this balance again can be complex.
Understanding equilibrium wages helps grasp how labor markets respond to various forces, fostering informed economic planning and decision-making.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A welfare program for low-income people offers a family a basic grant of $6,000 per year. This grant is reduced by $0.75 for each $1 of other income the family has. a. How much in welfare benefits does the family receive if it has no other income? If the head of the family earns $2,000 per year? How about $4,000 per year? b. At what level of earnings does the welfare grant become zero? c. Assume the head of this family can earn $4 per hour and that the family has no other income. What is the annual budget constraint for this family if it does not participate in the welfare program? That is, how are consumption ( c ) and hours of leisure ( h ) related? What is the budget constraint if the family opts to participate in the welfare program? (Remember, the welfare grant can only be positive. e. Graph your results from parts (c) and (d). f. Suppose the government changes the rules of the welfare program to permit families to keep 50 percent of what they earn. How would this change your answers to parts (d) and (e)? g. Using your results from part (f), can you predict whether the head of this family will work more or less under the new rules described in part (f)?

The theory developed in this chapter treats labor supply as the mirror image of the demand for leisure. Hence, the entire body of demand theory developed in Part 2 of the text becomes relevant to the study of labor supply as well. Here are three examples. a. Roy's identity. In the Extensions to Chapter 5 we showed how demand functions can be derived from indirect utility functions by using Roy's identity. Use a similar approach to show that the labor supply function associated with the utility. maximization problem described in Equation 16.20 can be derived from the indirect utility function by \[ l(w, n)=\frac{\partial V(w, n) / \partial w}{\partial V(w, n) / \partial n} \] Illustrate this result for the Cobb-Douglas case described in Example 16.1 b. Substitutes and complements. A change in the real wage will affect not only labor supply, but also the demand for specific items in the preferred consumption bundle. Develop a Slutsky-type equation for the cross-price effect of a change in w on a particular consumption item and then use it to discuss whether leisure and the item are (net or gross) substitutes or complements. Provide an example of each type of relationship. c. Labor supply and marginal expense. Use a derivation similar to that used to calculate marginal revenue for a given demand curve to show that MEl=w(1+1/elw).

Carl the clothier owns a large garment factory on an isolated island. Carl's factory is the only source of employment for most of the islanders, and thus Carl acts as a monopsonist. The supply curve for garment workers is given by \[ l=80 w \] where l is the number of workers hired and w is their hourly wage. Assume also that Carl's labor demand (marginal revenue product ) curve is given by \[ l=400-40 M R P_{1} \] a. How many workers will Carl hire to maximize his profits, and what wage will he pay? b. Assume now that the government implements a minimum wage law covering all garment workers. How many workers will Carl now hire, and how much unemployment will there be if the minimum wage is set at $4 per hour? c. Graph your results. under perfect competition? (Assume the minimum wage is above the market- determined wage.)

Following in the spirit of the labor market game described in Example 16.6, suppose the firm's total revenue function is given by \[ R=10 l-l^{2} \] and the union's utility is simply a function of the total wage bill: \[ U(w, l)=w l \] a. What is the Nash equilibrium wage contract in the two-stage game described in Example 16.6? b. Show that the alternative wage contract w=l=4 is Pareto superior to the contract identified in part (a). c. Under what conditions would the contract described in part (b) be sustainable as a subgame-perfect equilibrium?

uncertain. If we assume utility is additive across the two periods, we have E[U(c1,h1,c2,h2)]=U(c1,h1)+E[U(c2,h2)] Show that the first-order conditions for utility maximization in period 1 are the same as those shown in Chapter 16; in particular, show MRS(c1 for h1)=w1. Explain how changes in W0 will affect the actual choices of c1 and h1 b. Explain why the indirect utility function for the second period can be written as V(w2,W), where W=W0+w1(1h1) c1. (Note that because w2 is a random variable, V is also random.) c. Use the envelope theorem to show that optimal choice of W requires that the Lagrange multipliers for the wealth constraint in the two periods obey the condition λ1=E(λ2) (where λ1 is the Lagrange multiplier for the original problem and λ2 is the implied Lagrange multiplier for the period 2 utility- maximization problem). That is, the expected marginal utility of wealth should be the same in the two periods. Explain this result intuitively. d. Although the comparative statics of this model will depend on the specific form of the utility function, discuss in general terms how a governmental policy that added k dollars to all period 2 wages might be expected to affect choices in both periods.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free