Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let ci be the constant marginal and average cost for firm i (so that firms may have different marginal costs). Suppose demand is given by P=1Q a. Calculate the Nash equilibrium quantities assuming there are two firms in a Cournot market. Also compute market output, market price, firm profits, industry profits, consumer surplus, and total welfare. b. Represent the Nash equilibrium on a best-response function diagram. Show how a reduction in firm 1 's cost would change the equilibrium. Draw a representative isoprofit for firm 1

Short Answer

Expert verified
In a Cournot market with two firms, given the demand function P=1Q and constant marginal costs c1 and c2 for firm 1 and firm 2 respectively, we first determine the Nash equilibrium quantities for both firms, which are q1=2c1c23 and q2=2c1c23. From this, we can calculate market output, market price, firm and industry profits, consumer surplus, and total welfare. After plotting the best-response functions for both firms on a diagram, we can observe the effect of a reduction in firm 1's cost on equilibrium quantity. A decrease in firm 1's cost leads to an upward shift in its best-response function, resulting in a higher Nash equilibrium quantity for firm 1 and a lower Nash equilibrium quantity for firm 2. By drawing an isoprofit curve for firm 1, we can also see that in a Cournot model, firm 1's profit increases with both a higher Nash equilibrium quantity for firm 1 and a lower Nash equilibrium quantity for firm 2.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the inverse demand function

Given the demand function is P=1Q, where Q is the total quantity supplied.
02

Define firm 1 and firm 2 quantities, cost functions, and reaction functions

Let q1 be the quantity supplied by firm 1 and q2 be the quantity supplied by firm 2. Total output in the market is Q=q1+q2. Now, let the constant marginal and average costs for the two firms be denoted as c1 and c2. The profit function for firm i can be denoted as πi=P×qici×qi. To derive the reaction functions for both firms, we need to find the maximization of their profit functions with respect to their quantity. First, profit maximization for firm 1: π1=(1Q)q1c1q1 Now, we derive the first-order condition with respect to q1: π1q1=12q1q2c1=0 This leads to the reaction function for firm 1: q1=1c1q22 Similarly, we derive the reaction function for firm 2: q2=1c2q12
03

Solve for Nash Equilibrium quantities

To find the Nash equilibrium, we need to solve the reaction functions simultaneously. Substitute the reaction function for firm 1 into the reaction function of firm 2: q2=1c2(1c1q22)2 By solving this quadratic equation, we obtain the Nash equilibrium quantities for both firms: q1=2c1c23 q2=2c1c23
04

Calculate market output, market price, and firm and industry profits

Market output: Q=q1+q2=42(c1+c2)3 Market price: P=1Q=1+c1+c23 Firm 1 profit: π1=P×q1c1×q1=(1+c1+c23)(2c1c23)c1(2c1c23) Firm 2 profit: π2=P×q2c2×q2=(1+c1+c23)(2c1c23)c2(2c1c23) Industry profit: πindustry=π1+π2
05

Calculate consumer surplus and total welfare

Consumer surplus: CS=12(1P)(Q) Total welfare: TW=CS+πindustry #Part B: Nash Equilibrium Representation on Best-Response Diagram#
06

Plot best-response functions

On a best-response diagram, plot the reaction functions for firm 1 and firm 2 (q1=1c1q22 and q2=1c2q12) with q1 on the x-axis and q2 on the y-axis. The intersection point of these reaction functions is the Nash equilibrium we computed earlier.
07

Analyze the effect of a reduction in firm 1's cost on equilibrium

If firm 1's cost c1 decreases, the best-response function for firm 1 shifts upward, with the slope still at -0.5. The new equilibrium occurs at the new intersection of the best-response functions, resulting in a higher Nash equilibrium quantity for firm 1 (q1) and a lower Nash equilibrium quantity for firm 2 (q2).
08

Draw representative isoprofit for firm 1

On the same best-response diagram, draw an isoprofit curve for firm 1 (indicating the set of points where firm 1 makes the same profit). The curve should be upward-sloping, with the slope greater than 0. This is because, in a Cournot model, firm 1's profit increases with both a higher q1 and a lower q2.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assume for simplicity that a monopolist has no costs of production and faces a demand curve given by Q=150P a. Calculate the profit-maximizing price-quantity combination for this monopolist. Also calculate the monopolist's profit. b. Suppose instead that there are two firms in the market facing the demand and cost conditions just described for their identical products. Firms choose quantities simultaneously as in the Cournot model. Compute the outputs in the Nash equilibrium. Also compute market output, price, and firm profits. c. Suppose the two firms choose prices simultaneously as in the Bertrand model. Compute the prices in the Nash equilibrium. Also compute firm output and profit as well as market output. d. Graph the demand curve and indicate where the market price-quantity combinations from parts (a)-(c) appear on the curve.

Suppose that firms' marginal and average costs are constant and equal to c and that inverse market demand is given by P=abQ where a,b>0 a. Calculate the profit-maximizing price-quantity combination for a monopolist. Also calculate the monopolist's profit. b. Calculate the Nash equilibrium quantities for Cournot duopolists, which choose quantities for their identical products simultaneously. Also compute market output, market price, and firm and industry profits. c. Calculate the Nash equilibrium prices for Bertrand duopolists, which choose prices for their identical products simultaneously. Also compute firm and market output as well as firm and industry profits. depose now that there are n identical firms in a Cournot model. Compute the Nash equilibrium quantities as functions of n. Also compute market output, market price, and firm and industry profits. e. Show that the monopoly outcome from part (a) can be reproduced in part (d) by setting n=1, that the Cournot duopoly outcome from part (b) can be reproduced in part (d) by setting n=2 in part (d), and that letting n approach infinity yields the same market price, output, and industry profit as in part (c).

Use the first-order condition (Equation 15.2 ) for a Cournot firm to show that the usual inverse elasticity rule from Chapter 11 holds under Cournot competition (where the elasticity is associated with an individual firm's residual demand, the demand left after all rivals sell their output on the market). Manipulate Equation 15.2 in a different way to obtain an equivalent version of the inverse elasticity rule: \[ \frac{P-M C}{P}=-\frac{s_{i}}{e_{Q, P}} \] where si=qi/Q is firm i's market share and eQ,p is the elasticity of market demand. Compare this version of the inverse elasticity rule with that for a monopolist from the previous chapter.

Consider the following Bertrand game involving two firms producing differentiated products. Firms have no costs of production. Firm 1's demand is \[ q_{1}=1-p_{1}+b p_{2} \] where b>0. A symmetric equation holds for firm 2 's demand. a. Solve for the Nash equilibrium of the simultaneous price-choice game. b. Compute the firms' outputs and profits. c. Represent the equilibrium on a best-response function diagram. Show how an increase in b would change the equilibrium. Draw a representative isoprofit curve for firm 1

One way of measuring market concentration is through the use of the Herfindahl index, which is defined as \[ H=\sum_{i=1}^{n} s_{i}^{2} \] where st=qi/Q is firm i s market share. The higher is H, the more concentrated the industry is said to be. Intuitively, more concentrated markets are thought to be less competitive because dominant firms in concentrated markets face little competitive pressure. We will assess the validity of this intuition using several models. a. If you have not already done so, answer Problem 15.2d by computing the Nash equilibrium of this n -firm Cournot game. Also compute market output, market price, consumer surplus, industry profit, and total welfare. Compute the Herfindahl index for this equilibrium. b. Suppose two of the n firms merge, leaving the market with n1 firms. Recalculate the Nash equilibrium and the rest of the items requested in part (a). How does the merger affect price, output, profit, consumer surplus, total welfare, and the Herfindahl index? c. Put the model used in parts (a) and (b) aside and turn to a different setup: that of Problem 15.3, where Cournot duopolists face different marginal costs. Use your answer to Problem 15.3 to compute equilibrium firm outputs, market output, price, consumer surplus, industry profit, and total welfare, substituting the particular cost parameters c1=c2=1/4. Also compute the Herfindahl index. d. Repeat your calculations in part (c) while assuming that firm 1's marginal cost c1 falls to 0 but c2 stays at 1/4. How does the cost change affect price, output, profit, consumer surplus, total welfare, and the Herfindahl index? e. Given your results from parts (a)-(d), can we draw any general conclusions about the relationship between market concentration on the one hand and price, profit, or total welfare on the other?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free