Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(c_{i}\) be the constant marginal and average cost for firm \(i\) (so that firms may have different marginal costs). Suppose demand is given by \(P=1-Q\) a. Calculate the Nash equilibrium quantities assuming there are two firms in a Cournot market. Also compute market output, market price, firm profits, industry profits, consumer surplus, and total welfare. b. Represent the Nash equilibrium on a best-response function diagram. Show how a reduction in firm 1 's cost would change the equilibrium. Draw a representative isoprofit for firm 1

Short Answer

Expert verified
In a Cournot market with two firms, given the demand function \(P = 1 - Q\) and constant marginal costs \(c_1\) and \(c_2\) for firm 1 and firm 2 respectively, we first determine the Nash equilibrium quantities for both firms, which are \(q_1^* = \frac{2 - c_1 - c_2}{3}\) and \(q_2^* = \frac{2 - c_1 - c_2}{3}\). From this, we can calculate market output, market price, firm and industry profits, consumer surplus, and total welfare. After plotting the best-response functions for both firms on a diagram, we can observe the effect of a reduction in firm 1's cost on equilibrium quantity. A decrease in firm 1's cost leads to an upward shift in its best-response function, resulting in a higher Nash equilibrium quantity for firm 1 and a lower Nash equilibrium quantity for firm 2. By drawing an isoprofit curve for firm 1, we can also see that in a Cournot model, firm 1's profit increases with both a higher Nash equilibrium quantity for firm 1 and a lower Nash equilibrium quantity for firm 2.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the inverse demand function

Given the demand function is \(P = 1 - Q\), where \(Q\) is the total quantity supplied.
02

Define firm 1 and firm 2 quantities, cost functions, and reaction functions

Let \(q_1\) be the quantity supplied by firm 1 and \(q_2\) be the quantity supplied by firm 2. Total output in the market is \(Q = q_1 + q_2\). Now, let the constant marginal and average costs for the two firms be denoted as \(c_1\) and \(c_2\). The profit function for firm i can be denoted as \(\pi_i = P \times q_i - c_i \times q_i\). To derive the reaction functions for both firms, we need to find the maximization of their profit functions with respect to their quantity. First, profit maximization for firm 1: \(\pi_1 = (1 - Q)q_1 - c_1q_1\) Now, we derive the first-order condition with respect to \(q_1\): \(\frac{\partial \pi_1}{\partial q_1} = 1 - 2q_1 - q_2 - c_1 = 0\) This leads to the reaction function for firm 1: \(q_1^* = \frac{1 - c_1 - q_2}{2}\) Similarly, we derive the reaction function for firm 2: \(q_2^* = \frac{1 - c_2 - q_1}{2}\)
03

Solve for Nash Equilibrium quantities

To find the Nash equilibrium, we need to solve the reaction functions simultaneously. Substitute the reaction function for firm 1 into the reaction function of firm 2: \(q_2^* = \frac{1 - c_2 - (\frac{1 - c_1 - q_2}{2})}{2}\) By solving this quadratic equation, we obtain the Nash equilibrium quantities for both firms: \(q_1^* = \frac{2 - c_1 - c_2}{3}\) \(q_2^* = \frac{2 - c_1 - c_2}{3}\)
04

Calculate market output, market price, and firm and industry profits

Market output: \(Q = q_1 + q_2 = \frac{4 - 2(c_1+c_2)}{3}\) Market price: \(P = 1 - Q = \frac{1 + c_1 + c_2}{3}\) Firm 1 profit: \(\pi_1 = P \times q_1 - c_1 \times q_1 = (\frac{1 + c_1 + c_2}{3})(\frac{2 - c_1 - c_2}{3}) - c_1(\frac{2 - c_1 - c_2}{3})\) Firm 2 profit: \(\pi_2 = P \times q_2 - c_2 \times q_2 = (\frac{1 + c_1 + c_2}{3})(\frac{2 - c_1 - c_2}{3}) - c_2(\frac{2 - c_1 - c_2}{3})\) Industry profit: \(\pi_{industry} = \pi_1 + \pi_2\)
05

Calculate consumer surplus and total welfare

Consumer surplus: \(CS = \frac{1}{2}(1 - P)(Q)\) Total welfare: \(TW = CS + \pi_{industry}\) #Part B: Nash Equilibrium Representation on Best-Response Diagram#
06

Plot best-response functions

On a best-response diagram, plot the reaction functions for firm 1 and firm 2 (\(q_1^* = \frac{1 - c_1 - q_2}{2}\) and \(q_2^* = \frac{1 - c_2 - q_1}{2}\)) with \(q_1\) on the x-axis and \(q_2\) on the y-axis. The intersection point of these reaction functions is the Nash equilibrium we computed earlier.
07

Analyze the effect of a reduction in firm 1's cost on equilibrium

If firm 1's cost \(c_1\) decreases, the best-response function for firm 1 shifts upward, with the slope still at -0.5. The new equilibrium occurs at the new intersection of the best-response functions, resulting in a higher Nash equilibrium quantity for firm 1 (\(q_1^*\)) and a lower Nash equilibrium quantity for firm 2 (\(q_2^*\)).
08

Draw representative isoprofit for firm 1

On the same best-response diagram, draw an isoprofit curve for firm 1 (indicating the set of points where firm 1 makes the same profit). The curve should be upward-sloping, with the slope greater than 0. This is because, in a Cournot model, firm 1's profit increases with both a higher \(q_1^*\) and a lower \(q_2^*\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that firms' marginal and average costs are constant and equal to \(c\) and that inverse market demand is given by \(P=a-b Q\) where \(a, b > 0\) a. Calculate the profit-maximizing price-quantity combination for a monopolist. Also calculate the monopolist's profit. b. Calculate the Nash equilibrium quantities for Cournot duopolists, which choose quantities for their identical products simultaneously. Also compute market output, market price, and firm and industry profits. c. Calculate the Nash equilibrium prices for Bertrand duopolists, which choose prices for their identical products simultaneously. Also compute firm and market output as well as firm and industry profits. depose now that there are \(n\) identical firms in a Cournot model. Compute the Nash equilibrium quantities as functions of \(n\). Also compute market output, market price, and firm and industry profits. e. Show that the monopoly outcome from part (a) can be reproduced in part (d) by setting \(n=1\), that the Cournot duopoly outcome from part (b) can be reproduced in part (d) by setting \(n=2\) in part (d), and that letting \(n\) approach infinity yields the same market price, output, and industry profit as in part (c).

Recall Example \(15.6,\) which covers tacit collusion. Suppose (as in the example) that a medical device is produced at constant average and marginal cost of \(\$ 10\) and that the demand for the device is given by \\[ Q=5,000-100 P \\] The market meets each period for an infinite number of periods. The discount factor is \(\delta\). a. Suppose that \(n\) firms engage in Bertrand competition each period. Suppose it takes two periods to discover a deviation because it takes two periods to observe rivals' prices. Compute the discount factor needed to sustain collusion in a subgame-perfect equilibrium using grim strategies. b. Now restore the assumption that, as in Example \(15.7,\) deviations are detected after just one period. Next, assume that \(n\) is not given but rather is determined by the number of firms that choose to enter the market in an initial stage in which entrants must sink a one-time cost \(K\) to participate in the market. Find an upper bound on \(n\). Hint: Two conditions are involved.

Use the first-order condition (Equation 15.2 ) for a Cournot firm to show that the usual inverse elasticity rule from Chapter 11 holds under Cournot competition (where the elasticity is associated with an individual firm's residual demand, the demand left after all rivals sell their output on the market). Manipulate Equation 15.2 in a different way to obtain an equivalent version of the inverse elasticity rule: \\[ \frac{P-M C}{P}=-\frac{s_{i}}{e_{Q, P}} \\] where \(s_{i}=q_{i} / Q\) is firm i's market share and \(e_{Q, p}\) is the elasticity of market demand. Compare this version of the inverse elasticity rule with that for a monopolist from the previous chapter.

This question will explore signaling when entry deterrence is impossible; thus, the signaling firm accommodates its rival's entry. Assume deterrence is impossible because the two firms do not pay a sunk cost to enter or remain in the market. The setup of the model will follow Example \(15.4,\) so the calculations there will aid the solution of this problem. In particular, firm \(i\) 's demand is given by $$q_{i}=a_{i}-p_{i}+\frac{p_{j}}{2}$$ where \(a_{i}\) is product \(i\) 's attribute (say, quality). Production is costless. Firm 1's attribute can be one of two values: either \(a_{1}=1\) in which case we say firm 1 is the low type, or \(a_{1}=2,\) in which case we say it is the high type. Assume there is no discounting across periods for simplicity. a. Compute the Nash equilibrium of the game of complete information in which firm 1 is the high type and firm 2 knows that firm 1 is the high type. b. Compute the Nash equilibrium of the game in which firm 1 is the low type and firm 2 knows that firm 1 is the low type. c. Solve for the Bayesian-Nash equilibrium of the game of incomplete information in which firm 1 can be either type with equal probability. Firm 1 knows its type, but firm 2 only knows the probabilities. Because we did not spend time this chapter on Bayesian games, you may want to consult Chapter 8 (especially Example 8.7 ). d. Which of firm 1 's types gains from incomplete information? Which type would prefer complete information (and thus would have an incentive to signal its type if possible)? Does firm 2 earn more profit on average under complete information or under incomplete information? e. Consider a signaling variant of the model chat has two periods. Firms 1 and 2 choose prices in the first period, when firm 2 has incomplete information about firm 1 's type. Firm 2 observes firm 1 's price in this period and uses the information to update its beliefs about firm 1's type. Then firms engage in another period of price competition. Show that there is a separating equilibrium in which each type of firm 1 charges the same prices as computed in part (d). You may assume that, if firm 1 chooses an out-of-equilibrium price in the first period, then firm 2 believes that firm 1 is the low type with probability 1 . Hint: To prove the existence of a separating equilibrium, show that the loss to the low type from trying to pool in the first period exceeds the second-period gain from having convinced firm 2 that it is the high type. Use your answers from parts (a)-(d) where possible to aid in your solution.

Recall the Hotelling model of competition on a linear beach from Example \(15.5 .\) Suppose for simplicity that ice cream stands can locate only at the two ends of the line segment (zoning prohibits commercial development in the middle of the beach). This question asks you to analyze an entry-deterring strategy involving product proliferation. a. Consider the subgame in which firm \(A\) has two ice cream stands, one at each end of the beach, and \(B\) locates along with \(A\) at the right endpoint. What is the Nash equilibrium of this subgame? Hint: Bertrand competition ensues at the right endpoint. b. If \(B\) must sink an entry cost \(K_{B}\), would it choose to enter given that firm \(A\) is in both ends of the market and remains there after entry? c. Is \(A\) 's product proliferation strategy credible? Or would \(A\) exit the right end of the market after \(B\) enters? To answer these questions, compare \(A\) 's profits for the case in which it has a stand on the left side and both it and \(B\) have stands on the right to the case in which \(A\) has one stand on the left end and \(B\) has one stand on the right end (so \(B\) 's entry has driven \(A\) out of the right side of the market).

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free