Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that firms' marginal and average costs are constant and equal to \(c\) and that inverse market demand is given by \(P=a-b Q\) where \(a, b > 0\) a. Calculate the profit-maximizing price-quantity combination for a monopolist. Also calculate the monopolist's profit. b. Calculate the Nash equilibrium quantities for Cournot duopolists, which choose quantities for their identical products simultaneously. Also compute market output, market price, and firm and industry profits. c. Calculate the Nash equilibrium prices for Bertrand duopolists, which choose prices for their identical products simultaneously. Also compute firm and market output as well as firm and industry profits. depose now that there are \(n\) identical firms in a Cournot model. Compute the Nash equilibrium quantities as functions of \(n\). Also compute market output, market price, and firm and industry profits. e. Show that the monopoly outcome from part (a) can be reproduced in part (d) by setting \(n=1\), that the Cournot duopoly outcome from part (b) can be reproduced in part (d) by setting \(n=2\) in part (d), and that letting \(n\) approach infinity yields the same market price, output, and industry profit as in part (c).

Short Answer

Expert verified
In equilibrium, a monopolist (single seller) sets a profit-maximizing price and quantity, leading to a relatively high price and relatively low output compared to more competitive market structures. The monopolist's profit is greater than zero. In a Cournot duopoly (two firms compete in quantities), the Nash equilibrium results in lower prices, higher output, and lower profits for each firm compared to a monopolist. The industry as a whole has a larger output and lower market price compared to the case of monopolist. In a Bertrand duopoly (two firms compete in prices), the Nash equilibrium prices equal the constant marginal costs, resulting in an output allocation between the firms and zero profits for each firm. This outcome converges to perfect competition as the number of firms in the market increases (as shown in part (d) when n approaches infinity).

Step by step solution

01

Write the Profit Function

The profit function is given by the difference between total revenue and total cost: \[\pi(Q)=R(Q)-C(Q)=(P \cdot Q)-(c \cdot Q)\] Since \(P=a-bQ\), we have \[\pi(Q)=(a-bQ)Q-cQ\]
02

Find the Profit-Maximizing Quantity

Differentiate the profit function with respect to Q and set the derivative equal to zero: \[\frac{d\pi(Q)}{dQ}=0\] \[\frac{d}{dQ}((a-bQ)Q-cQ)=0\] Solving for Q: \[Q^*=\frac{a-c}{2b}\]
03

Find the Profit-Maximizing Price

Plug the profit-maximizing quantity back into the inverse demand function: \[P^*=a-b\left(\frac{a-c}{2b}\right)\]
04

Calculate the Monopolist's Profit

Plug the profit-maximizing price and quantity back into the profit function: \[\pi^*=(P^*\cdot Q^*)-cQ^*\] b.
05

Write the Reaction Functions

The Cournot reaction functions for Firm 1 and Firm 2 are: \[Q_1^*=\frac{a-c+bQ_2}{2b}\] \[Q_2^*=\frac{a-c+bQ_1}{2b}\]
06

Solve the Reaction Functions Simultaneously

Solve for the equilibrium quantities \(Q_1^*\) and \(Q_2^*\): \[Q_1^*=\frac{a-c}{3b}\] \[Q_2^*=\frac{a-c}{3b}\]
07

Compute the Market Output, Market Price, and Firm and Industry Profits

Compute Q, P, and profits: \[Q=Q_1^*+Q_2^*=\frac{2(a-c)}{3b}\] \[P=a-bQ\] \[\pi_1=\pi_2=(P \cdot Q_i)-cQ_i\] \[\pi_{industry}=\pi_1+\pi_2\] c.
08

Write the Profit Functions for Bertrand Duopolists

The profit functions are given by: \[\pi_1=(P_1-c)\cdot Q_1(P_1,P_2)\] \[\pi_2=(P_2-c)\cdot Q_2(P_1,P_2)\]
09

Find Nash Equilibrium Prices

The Nash equilibrium prices for Bertrand Duopolists are both equal to the constant marginal cost: \[P_1^*=P_2^*=c\]
10

Compute Firm and Market Output, and Firm and Industry Profits

Compute outputs and profits given the equilibrium prices: \[Q_1(Q_1^*,Q_2^*)=Q_2(Q_1^*,Q_2^*)\] \[Q_1+Q_2=Q\] \[\pi_1=\pi_2=(P^*\cdot Q_i)-cQ_i\] \[\pi_{industry}=\pi_1+\pi_2\] d.
11

Write the Reaction Function for the nth Firm

The Cournot reaction function for the nth firm is: \[Q_n^*=\frac{a-c+\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}bQ_i}{(n+1)b}\]
12

Solve the Reaction Function for the Equilibrium Quantity as a Function of n

The equilibrium quantity for each firm is: \[Q_i^*=\frac{a-c}{(n+1)b}\]
13

Compute Market Output, Market Price, and Firm and Industry Profits

Compute Q, P, and profits: \[Q=\sum_{i=1}^n Q_i^*\] \[P=a-bQ\] \[\pi_i=(P \cdot Q_i^*)-cQ_i^*\] \[\pi_{industry}=\sum_{i=1}^n \pi_i\] e.
14

Show that Part (a) can be Reproduced with n=1

Replace n with 1 in the formulas from part (d) and show that the results are the same as in part (a).
15

Show that Part (b) can be Reproduced with n=2

Replace n with 2 in the formulas from part (d) and show that the results are the same as in part (b).
16

Show that As n Approaches Infinity, the Result Is the Same as Part (c)

As n becomes very large, the equilibrium prices and quantities converge to those of part (c). To show this, take the limit of the formulas from part (d) as n approaches infinity.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the following Bertrand game involving two firms producing differentiated products. Firms have no costs of production. Firm 1's demand is \\[ q_{1}=1-p_{1}+b p_{2} \\] where \(b > 0 .\) A symmetric equation holds for firm 2 's demand. a. Solve for the Nash equilibrium of the simultaneous price-choice game. b. Compute the firms' outputs and profits. c. Represent the equilibrium on a best-response function diagram. Show how an increase in \(b\) would change the equilibrium. Draw a representative isoprofit curve for firm 1

Hotelling's model of competition on a linear beach is used widely in many applications, but one application that is difficult to study in the model is free entry. Free entry is easiest to study in a model with symmetric firms, but more than two firms on a line cannot be symmetric because those located nearest the endpoints will have only one neighboring rival, whereas those located nearer the middle will have two. To avoid this problem, Steven Salop introduced competition on a circle. \(^{18}\) As in the Hotelling model, demanders are located at each point, and each demands one unit of the good. A consumer's surplus equals \(v\) (the value of consuming the good) minus the price paid for the good as well as the cost of having to travel to buy from the firm. Let this travel cost be \(t d\), where \(t\) is a parameter measuring how burdensome travel is and \(d\) is the distance traveled (note that we are here assuming a linear rather than a quadratic travel-cost function, in contrast to Example 15.5 . Initially, we take as given that there are \(n\) firms in the market and that each has the same cost function \(C_{i}=K+c q_{i}\) where \(K\) is the sunk cost required to enter the market [this will come into play in part (e) of the question, where we consider free entry] and \(c\) is the constant marginal cost of production. For simplicity, assume that the circumference of the circle equals 1 and that the \(n\) firms are located evenly around the circle at intervals of \(1 / n\). The \(n\) firms choose prices \(p_{i}\) simultancously. a. Each firm \(i\) is free to choose its own price \(\left(p_{i}\right)\) but is constrained by the price charged by its nearest neighbor to either side. Let \(p^{*}\) be the price these firms set in a symmetric equilibrium. Explain why the extent of any firm's market on either side \((x)\) is given by the equation $$p+t x=p^{*}+t[(1 / n)-x]$$ b. Given the pricing decision analyzed in part (a), firm \(i\) sells \(q_{i}=2 x\) because it has a market on both sides. Calculate the profit-maximizing price for this firm as a function of \(p^{*}, c, t,\) and \(n\) c. Noting that in a symmetric equilibrium all firms' prices will be equal to \(p^{*},\) show that \(p_{i}=p^{*}=c+t / n .\) Explain this result intuitively. d. Show that a firm's profits are \(t / n^{2}-K\) in equilibrium. e. What will the number of firms \(n^{*}\) be in long-run equilibrium in which firms can freely choose to enter? f. Calculate the socially optimal level of differentiation in this model, defined as the number of firms (and products) that minimizes the sum of production costs plus demander travel costs. Show that this number is precisely half the number calculated in part (e). Hence this model illustrates the possibility of overdifferentiation.

Use the first-order condition (Equation 15.2 ) for a Cournot firm to show that the usual inverse elasticity rule from Chapter 11 holds under Cournot competition (where the elasticity is associated with an individual firm's residual demand, the demand left after all rivals sell their output on the market). Manipulate Equation 15.2 in a different way to obtain an equivalent version of the inverse elasticity rule: \\[ \frac{P-M C}{P}=-\frac{s_{i}}{e_{Q, P}} \\] where \(s_{i}=q_{i} / Q\) is firm i's market share and \(e_{Q, p}\) is the elasticity of market demand. Compare this version of the inverse elasticity rule with that for a monopolist from the previous chapter.

Recall Example \(15.6,\) which covers tacit collusion. Suppose (as in the example) that a medical device is produced at constant average and marginal cost of \(\$ 10\) and that the demand for the device is given by \\[ Q=5,000-100 P \\] The market meets each period for an infinite number of periods. The discount factor is \(\delta\). a. Suppose that \(n\) firms engage in Bertrand competition each period. Suppose it takes two periods to discover a deviation because it takes two periods to observe rivals' prices. Compute the discount factor needed to sustain collusion in a subgame-perfect equilibrium using grim strategies. b. Now restore the assumption that, as in Example \(15.7,\) deviations are detected after just one period. Next, assume that \(n\) is not given but rather is determined by the number of firms that choose to enter the market in an initial stage in which entrants must sink a one-time cost \(K\) to participate in the market. Find an upper bound on \(n\). Hint: Two conditions are involved.

Let \(c_{i}\) be the constant marginal and average cost for firm \(i\) (so that firms may have different marginal costs). Suppose demand is given by \(P=1-Q\) a. Calculate the Nash equilibrium quantities assuming there are two firms in a Cournot market. Also compute market output, market price, firm profits, industry profits, consumer surplus, and total welfare. b. Represent the Nash equilibrium on a best-response function diagram. Show how a reduction in firm 1 's cost would change the equilibrium. Draw a representative isoprofit for firm 1

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free