Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Assume for simplicity that a monopolist has no costs of production and faces a demand curve given by Q=150P a. Calculate the profit-maximizing price-quantity combination for this monopolist. Also calculate the monopolist's profit. b. Suppose instead that there are two firms in the market facing the demand and cost conditions just described for their identical products. Firms choose quantities simultaneously as in the Cournot model. Compute the outputs in the Nash equilibrium. Also compute market output, price, and firm profits. c. Suppose the two firms choose prices simultaneously as in the Bertrand model. Compute the prices in the Nash equilibrium. Also compute firm output and profit as well as market output. d. Graph the demand curve and indicate where the market price-quantity combinations from parts (a)-(c) appear on the curve.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Summary of Results: a. Monopoly: - Profit-maximizing price: P = 75 - Profit-maximizing quantity: Q = 75 - Monopolist's profit: π = 5625 b. Cournot model: - Nash equilibrium: - Firm 1 output: q1 = 50 - Firm 2 output: q2 = 50 - Market output: Q = 100 - Market price: P = 50 - Firm profits: π1 = π2 = 2500 c. Bertrand model: - Nash equilibrium: - Firm 1 output: q1 = 37.5 - Firm 2 output: q2 = 37.5 - Market output: Q = 75 - Market price: P = 75 - Firm profits: π1 = π2 = 2812.5 d. Graph the demand curve with points A (Monopoly), B (Cournot), and C (Bertrand) marked as described above.

Step by step solution

01

Obtain the revenue function

Since the demand curve is given by Q = 150 - P, we want to express price (P) in terms of quantity (Q): P = 150 - Q. The revenue function is obtained by multiplying price and quantity: R(Q) = P × Q. Thus, R(Q) = (150 - Q) × Q = 150Q - Q^2.
02

Find the profit function and maximize it

Since there are no costs of production, the profit function will be equal to the revenue function: π(Q) = R(Q) = 150Q - Q^2. To maximize profits, we need to find the value of Q that maximizes π(Q). We do that by finding the derivative of π(Q) and setting it to 0: dπ(Q)/dQ = 150 - 2Q. Thus, 150 - 2Q = 0, so Q = 75.
03

Calculate price, quantity, and profit

Now that we have the monopoly quantity (Q = 75), we can substitute it back into the demand curve (P = 150 - Q) to find the price: P = 150 - 75 = 75. The monopolist's profit is calculated by substituting the quantities into the profit function: π(75) = 150 × 75 - 75^2 = 5625. b. Cournot model:
04

Set up reaction functions for both firms

Let's denote firm i's output by q_i and firm j's output by q_j (where i ≠ j). From the demand curve, we have P = 150 - (q_i + q_j). The revenue for firm i is R_i = P × q_i, so R_i = (150 - (q_i + q_j)) × q_i = 150q_i - q_i^2 - q_iq_j. Since there are no production costs, π_i = R_i.
05

Obtain best responses and find Nash equilibrium

To find firm i's best response, we take the derivative of its profit function with respect to q_i and set it to 0: dπ_i/dq_i = 150 - 2q_i - q_j = 0. This would give us q_i = (150 - q_j) / 2 as firm i's best response. Since both firms are identical, these best response functions can be used to find the Nash equilibrium: q_i = (150 - q_j) / 2 and q_j = (150 - q_i) / 2. By solving this system of equations, we have q_i = q_j = 50. Thus, the output levels in the Cournot Nash equilibrium are both 50.
06

Calculate market output, price, and firm profits

Since both firms produce 50 units, the total market output Q = q_i + q_j = 50 + 50 = 100. The market price can be obtained from the demand curve: P = 150 - 100 = 50. Firm profits (for both firms) can be found by substituting their quantities in their respective profit functions: π_i = π_j = 150 × 50 - 50^2 - 50 × 50 = 2500. c. Bertrand model:
07

No incentive to undercut given zero costs

In the Bertrand model, firms choose prices simultaneously. Here, since there are zero costs of production, there is no incentive for either firm to undercut the other. The Nash equilibrium in this case is simply charging the same price and sharing the market demand.
08

Calculate prices, output, and profits

Since there is no incentive to change prices, the firms will charge the same price. They will share the market demand, leading to each firm producing half the total demand, i.e., q_i = q_j = Q/2. As for monopoly profit maximization, the monopolist quantity equals 75. Now, firms sell half of that, so q_i = q_j = 75/2 = 37.5. The market price remains the same as in the monopoly case, P = 75. Substitute these values into the profit function for each firm: π_i = π_j = 150 × 37.5 - 37.5^2 = 2812.5. d. Graph the demand curve: The demand curve can be graphed with the quantity on the x-axis and the price on the y-axis. Additionally, each price-quantity combination can be marked on the graph as follows: - Monopoly: P = 75, Q = 75 (point A) - Cournot model: P = 50, Q = 100 (point B) - Bertrand model: P = 75, Q = 75 (point C, same as the monopoly case) Please note that you will need to draw the graph by yourself, as I am unable to provide graphical illustrations.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Hotelling's model of competition on a linear beach is used widely in many applications, but one application that is difficult to study in the model is free entry. Free entry is easiest to study in a model with symmetric firms, but more than two firms on a line cannot be symmetric because those located nearest the endpoints will have only one neighboring rival, whereas those located nearer the middle will have two. To avoid this problem, Steven Salop introduced competition on a circle. 18 As in the Hotelling model, demanders are located at each point, and each demands one unit of the good. A consumer's surplus equals v (the value of consuming the good) minus the price paid for the good as well as the cost of having to travel to buy from the firm. Let this travel cost be td, where t is a parameter measuring how burdensome travel is and d is the distance traveled (note that we are here assuming a linear rather than a quadratic travel-cost function, in contrast to Example 15.5 . Initially, we take as given that there are n firms in the market and that each has the same cost function Ci=K+cqi where K is the sunk cost required to enter the market [this will come into play in part (e) of the question, where we consider free entry] and c is the constant marginal cost of production. For simplicity, assume that the circumference of the circle equals 1 and that the n firms are located evenly around the circle at intervals of 1/n. The n firms choose prices pi simultancously. a. Each firm i is free to choose its own price (pi) but is constrained by the price charged by its nearest neighbor to either side. Let p be the price these firms set in a symmetric equilibrium. Explain why the extent of any firm's market on either side (x) is given by the equation p+tx=p+t[(1/n)x] b. Given the pricing decision analyzed in part (a), firm i sells qi=2x because it has a market on both sides. Calculate the profit-maximizing price for this firm as a function of p,c,t, and n c. Noting that in a symmetric equilibrium all firms' prices will be equal to p, show that pi=p=c+t/n. Explain this result intuitively. d. Show that a firm's profits are t/n2K in equilibrium. e. What will the number of firms n be in long-run equilibrium in which firms can freely choose to enter? f. Calculate the socially optimal level of differentiation in this model, defined as the number of firms (and products) that minimizes the sum of production costs plus demander travel costs. Show that this number is precisely half the number calculated in part (e). Hence this model illustrates the possibility of overdifferentiation.

Use the first-order condition (Equation 15.2 ) for a Cournot firm to show that the usual inverse elasticity rule from Chapter 11 holds under Cournot competition (where the elasticity is associated with an individual firm's residual demand, the demand left after all rivals sell their output on the market). Manipulate Equation 15.2 in a different way to obtain an equivalent version of the inverse elasticity rule: \[ \frac{P-M C}{P}=-\frac{s_{i}}{e_{Q, P}} \] where si=qi/Q is firm i's market share and eQ,p is the elasticity of market demand. Compare this version of the inverse elasticity rule with that for a monopolist from the previous chapter.

Recall Example 15.6, which covers tacit collusion. Suppose (as in the example) that a medical device is produced at constant average and marginal cost of $10 and that the demand for the device is given by \[ Q=5,000-100 P \] The market meets each period for an infinite number of periods. The discount factor is δ. a. Suppose that n firms engage in Bertrand competition each period. Suppose it takes two periods to discover a deviation because it takes two periods to observe rivals' prices. Compute the discount factor needed to sustain collusion in a subgame-perfect equilibrium using grim strategies. b. Now restore the assumption that, as in Example 15.7, deviations are detected after just one period. Next, assume that n is not given but rather is determined by the number of firms that choose to enter the market in an initial stage in which entrants must sink a one-time cost K to participate in the market. Find an upper bound on n. Hint: Two conditions are involved.

Consider the following Bertrand game involving two firms producing differentiated products. Firms have no costs of production. Firm 1's demand is \[ q_{1}=1-p_{1}+b p_{2} \] where b>0. A symmetric equation holds for firm 2 's demand. a. Solve for the Nash equilibrium of the simultaneous price-choice game. b. Compute the firms' outputs and profits. c. Represent the equilibrium on a best-response function diagram. Show how an increase in b would change the equilibrium. Draw a representative isoprofit curve for firm 1

Assume as in Problem 15.1 that two firms with no production costs, facing demand Q=150P, choose quantities q1 and q2 a. Compute the subgame-perfect equilibrium of the Stackelberg version of the game in which firm 1 chooses q1 first and then firm 2 chooses q2 b. Now add an entry stage after firm 1 chooses q1. In this stage, firm 2 decides whether to enter. If it enters, then it must sink cost K2, after which it is allowed to choose q2. Compute the threshold value of K2 above which firm 1 prefers to deter firm 2 s entry c. Represent the Cournot, Stackelberg, and entry-deterrence outcomes on a best-response function diagram.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free