Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose a perfectly competitive industry can produce widgets at a constant marginal cost of \(\$ 10\) per unit. Monopolized marginal costs increase to \(\$ 12\) per unit because \(\$ 2\) per unit must be paid to lobbyists to retain the widget producers' favored position. Suppose the market demand for widgets is given by \\[Q_{D}=1,000-50 P.\\] a. Calculate the perfectly competitive and monopoly outputs and prices. b. Calculate the total loss of consumer surplus from monopolization of widget production. c. Graph your results and explain how they differ from the usual analysis.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The total loss of consumer surplus from monopolization of widget production is $11,500.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the perfectly competitive output and price

In a perfectly competitive market, the price is equal to the marginal cost. The marginal cost in this case is given as \(\$10\) per unit. The demand function is given by: \\[Q_{D} = 1000 - 50P,\\] To calculate the perfectly competitive output and price, set the marginal cost equal to the price in the demand function: \\[10 = P.\\] Now, substitute the price back into the demand function to find the quantity: \\[Q_{D} = 1000 - 50(10) = 1000 - 500 = 500.\\] Therefore, the perfectly competitive output is 500 units and the price is \(\$10\).
02

Calculate the monopoly output and price

In a monopoly, the monopolized marginal cost is given as \(\$12\) per unit. To find the output and price in a monopolized market, we need to set the monopolized marginal cost equal to the marginal revenue derived from the demand function. First, we need the total revenue: \\[R = PQ = (1,000 - 50P)P.\\] Now, calculate the marginal revenue by differentiating the total revenue with respect to quantity: \\[\frac{dR}{dQ} = \frac{d}{dQ}(20,000 - 100P) = -100 + 2P.\\] Now, set the monopolized marginal cost (\(12\)) equal to the marginal revenue and solve for the price: \\[12 = -100 + 2P.\\] This gives: \\[P = \frac{112}{2} = \$56.\\] Now, substitute the price back into the demand function to find the quantity: \\[Q_{D} = 1000 - 50(56) = 1000 - 2800 = -1800.\\] Therefore, the monopoly output is 1800 less units compared to the perfectly competitive scenario and the price is \(\$56\).
03

Calculate the total loss of consumer surplus

Consumer surplus is the area under the demand curve and above the market price. In a perfectly competitive market, the consumer surplus is the area of the triangle formed by the demand curve, the price, and the quantity. In the monopolized scenario, the consumer surplus is the area under the demand curve and above the monopolized price up to the monopolized output. Loss of consumer surplus can be calculated as the difference in the areas under the curve: Loss of consumer surplus = (Area under the curve in a perfectly competitive market) - (Area under the curve in a monopolized market) In this case: Loss of consumer surplus = (0.5 × base × height) - (0.5 × base × height) Base and height refer to the respective dimensions of the triangular areas of consumer surplus under the demand curve. Loss of consumer surplus = (0.5 × 500 × 10) - (0.5 × 500 × 46) Loss of consumer surplus = 11,500 Therefore, the total loss of consumer surplus from monopolization of widget production is $11,500.
04

Graph your results and explain the differences

A graph comparing the perfectly competitive market and monopolized market can be drawn, with the x-axis representing the quantity and the y-axis representing the price. The demand curve will be a downward-sloping linear function intersecting the y-axis at P = 20 and the x-axis at Q = 400. The perfectly competitive equilibrium (price = \(10, quantity = 500) will be a point on the demand curve, while the monopolized equilibrium (price = \)56, quantity = -1800) will be below and to the left of the perfectly competitive equilibrium on the demand curve. The key differences between the perfectly competitive and monopolized scenarios are the prices and quantities produced. In the perfectly competitive market, the quantity produced is higher, and the price is lower, resulting in a larger consumer surplus. In the monopolized market, the quantity produced is lower, and the price is higher, resulting in a smaller consumer surplus and a total loss in consumer surplus due to monopolization.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Perfect Competition
Perfect competition is a theoretical market structure where numerous small firms, all producing identical products, compete against each other. In this idealized scenario, no single firm can influence the market price because the supply of the product is so vast. This results in each firm being a price taker, meaning they sell their products at the same price determined by the industry's overall supply and demand.
In a perfectly competitive market, the price equals the marginal cost of production. This efficiency leads to the maximum output being produced at the lowest price. For example, in the given exercise, the marginal cost is \(\$10\) per unit, aligning perfectly with the competitive price.
The perfectly competitive market results in the most consumer surplus and economic welfare, as goods are supplied at the minimum cost to consumers.
Consumer Surplus
Consumer surplus measures the benefit to consumers because they can purchase a product for less than the maximum price they are willing to pay. It is depicted as the area between the demand curve and the price consumers actually pay, up to the quantity purchased.
In competitive markets, maximum consumer surplus is achieved because products are priced at their marginal cost. In the exercise, this is shown as consumers pay \(\$10\) per unit, while they might have been willing to pay more at different levels.
When monopolistic behavior enters the market, the price rises due to decreased competition, and consumer surplus decreases. This loss is calculated in the exercise as the difference in areas under the demand curve, highlighting the monetary losses consumers face in a monopolized situation.
Marginal Cost
Marginal cost is the cost of producing one additional unit of a good. Understanding marginal cost is crucial, as firms aim to produce up to the point where marginal cost equals marginal revenue for profit maximization.
In perfect competition, the price is equal to the marginal cost, ensuring efficient allocation of resources. The original exercise shows the marginal cost of widget production as \(\\(10\) per unit. This aligns directly with the equilibrium price in a perfectly competitive market.
Under monopolization, marginal costs can rise due to additional expenses like lobbying costs. In the example, marginal costs become \(\\)12\), which disrupts the balance between cost and consumer pricing, moving away from efficiency.
Market Demand
Market demand refers to the total quantity of a good or service that consumers are willing and able to purchase at different price levels during a given period. The market demand schedule reflects the relationship between price and quantity demanded, and is typically illustrated by a downward-sloping curve.
This concept is crucial in determining market equilibrium, where supply meets demand. In the exercise, the market demand equation \(Q_D = 1000 - 50P\) is given, and it helps calculate equilibrium in both perfectly competitive and monopolistic scenarios.
Changes in price affect the quantity demanded, which is why monopolies can significantly impact market demand by charging higher prices and reducing the quantity available to consumers.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose a monopoly market has a demand function in which quantity demanded depends not only on market price (P) but also on the amount of advertising the firm does ( \(A\), measured in dollars). The specific form of this function is \\[Q=(20-P)\left(1+0.1 A-0.01 A^{2}\right).\\] The monopolistic firm's cost function is given by \\[C=10 Q+15+A.\\] a. Suppose there is no advertising \((A=0) .\) What output will the profit- maximizing firm choose? What market price will this yield? What will be the monopoly's profits? b. Now let the firm also choose its optimal level of advertising expenditure. In this situation, what output level will be chosen? What price will this yield? What will the level of advertising be? What are the firm's profits in this case? Hint: This can be worked out most easily by assuming the monopoly chooses the profit-maximizing price rather than quantity.

Suppose a monopolist produces alkaline batteries that may have various useful lifetimes \((X) .\) Suppose also that consumers (inverse) demand depends on batteries' lifetimes and quantity (Q) purchased according to the function \\[P(Q, X)=g(X \cdot Q),\\] where \(g^{\prime} < 0 .\) That is, consumers care only about the product of quantity times lifetime: They are willing to pay equally for many short-lived batteries or few long-lived ones. Assume also that battery costs are given by \\[C(Q, X)=C(X) Q,\\] where \(C^{\prime}(X) > 0 .\) Show that, in this case, the monopoly will opt for the same level of \(X\) as does a competitive industry even though levels of output and prices may differ. Explain your result. Hint: Treat \(X Q\) as a composite commodity.

Suppose the government wishes to combat the undesirable allocational effects of a monopoly through the use of a subsidy. a. Why would a lump-sum subsidy not achieve the government's goal? b. Use a graphical proof to show how a per-unit-of-output subsidy might achieve the government's goal. c. Suppose the government wants its subsidy to maximize the difference between the total value of the good to consumers and the good's total cost. Show that, to achieve this goal, the government should set \\[\frac{t}{P}=-\frac{1}{e_{Q, P}},\\] where \(t\) is the per-unit subsidy and \(P\) is the competitive price. Explain your result intuitively.

Suppose the market for Hula Hoops is monopolized by a single firm. a. Draw the initial equilibrium for such a market. b. Now suppose the demand for Hula Hoops shifts outward slightly. Show that, in general (contrary to the competitive case), it will not be possible to predict the effect of this shift in demand on the market price of Hula Hoops. c. Consider three possible ways in which the price elasticity of demand might change as the demand curve shifts: It might increase, it might decrease, or it might stay the same. Consider also that marginal costs for the monopolist might be increasing, decreasing, or constant in the range where \(M R=M C\). Consequently, there are nine different combinations of types of demand shifts and marginal cost slope configurations. Analyze each of these to determine for which it is possible to make a definite prediction about the effect of the shift in demand on the price of Hula Hoops.

The taxation of monopoly can sometimes produce results different from those that arise in the competitive case. This problem looks at some of those cases. Most of these can be analyzed by using the inverse elasticity rule (Equation 14.1 ). a. Consider first an ad valorem tax on the price of a monopoly's good. This tax reduces the net price received by the monopoly from \(P\) to \(P(1-t)-\) where \(t\) is the proportional tax rate. Show that, with a linear demand curve and constant marginal cost, the imposition of such a tax causes price to increase by less than the full extent of the tax. b. Suppose that the demand curve in part (a) were a constant elasticity curve. Show that the price would now increase by precisely the full extent of the tax. Explain the difference between these two cases. c. Describe a case where the imposition of an ad valorem tax on a monopoly would cause the price to increase by more than the tax. d. A specific tax is a fixed amount per unit of output. If the tax rate is \(\tau\) per unit, total tax collections are \(\tau Q .\) Show that the imposition of a specific tax on a monopoly will reduce output more (and increase price more) than will the imposition of an ad valorem tax that collects the same tax revenue.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free