Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose two individuals (Smith and Jones) each have 10 hours of labor to devote to producing either ice cream (x) or chicken soup \((y) .\) Smith's utility function is given by \\[ U_{s}=x^{0.3} y^{07} \\] whereas Jones" is given by \\[ U_{I}=x^{0.5} y^{0.5} \\] The individuals do not care whether they produce \(x\) or \(y\), and the production function for each good is given by \\[ x=2 l \text { and } y=3 l \\] where \(l\) is the total labor devoted to production of each good. a. What must the price ratio, \(p_{x} / p_{y}\) be? b. Given this price ratio, how much \(x\) and \(y\) will Smith and Jones demand? Hint: Set the wage equal to 1 here. c. How should labor be allocated between \(x\) and \(y\) to satisfy the demand calculated in part (b)?

Short Answer

Expert verified
b. Calculate the quantity demanded for both ice cream (x) and chicken soup (y) for Smith and Jones. c. Find how labor should be allocated between the two goods to satisfy the demand from part (b). a. The price ratio of ice cream (x) to chicken soup (y) is 3/7. b. The quantity demanded for ice cream (x) is (3/7)(y_s + y_j) and for chicken soup (y) is y_s + y_j. c. Labor should be allocated as follows: 25/6 hours for producing ice cream (x) and 35/6 hours for producing chicken soup (y).

Step by step solution

01

Find the Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS) for Both Individuals

Calculate the MRS for both individuals, as it reflects the rate at which they are willing to trade one good for another. Define the MRS as the ratio of the marginal utility (MU) for each good: - For Smith: \(MU_{x_s} = \frac{\partial U_s}{\partial x} = 0.3x^{-0.7}y^{0.7}\) \(MU_{y_s} = \frac{\partial U_s}{\partial y} = 0.7x^{0.3}y^{-0.3}\) \(MRS_s = \frac{MU_{x_s}}{MU_{y_s}} = \frac{0.3x^{-0.7}y^{0.7}}{0.7x^{0.3}y^{-0.3}} = \frac{0.3}{0.7}\frac{y}{x}\) - For Jones: \(MU_{x_j} = \frac{\partial U_j}{\partial x} = 0.5x^{-0.5}y^{0.5}\) \(MU_{y_j} = \frac{\partial U_j}{\partial y} = 0.5x^{0.5}y^{-0.5}\) \(MRS_j = \frac{MU_{x_j}}{MU_{y_j}} = \frac{0.5x^{-0.5}y^{0.5}}{0.5x^{0.5}y^{-0.5}} = \frac{y}{x}\)
02

Determine the Price Ratio of x and y

Since both individuals only care about their utility (not whether they produce x or y), the MRS for both must be equal to the price ratio, i.e., \(\frac{MRS_s}{MRS_j} = \frac{p_x}{p_y}\). \(\frac{\frac{0.3}{0.7}\frac{y}{x}}{\frac{y}{x}} = \frac{p_x}{p_y}\) Thus, the price ratio is: \(p_x / p_y = \frac{0.3}{0.7} = \frac{3}{7}\)
03

Find the Demand for x and y for Smith and Jones

To find the demands, we will use their utility maximization conditions: - For Smith: \(\frac{MU_{x_s}}{p_x} = \frac{MU_{y_s}}{p_y}\) \(\frac{0.3x^{-0.7}y^{0.7}}{3l} = \frac{0.7x^{0.3}y^{-0.3}}{7l}\) \(x_s = \frac{3}{7} y_s\) - For Jones: \(\frac{MU_{x_j}}{p_x} = \frac{MU_{y_j}}{p_y}\) \(\frac{0.5x^{-0.5}y^{0.5}}{3l} = \frac{0.5x^{0.5}y^{-0.5}}{7l}\) \(x_j = \frac{3}{7} y_j\) Summing up the demands by both individuals, we get: \(x = x_s + x_j = \frac{3}{7}(y_s + y_j) = \frac{3}{7}y\)
04

Allocate Labor to Satisfy Demand

Use the production functions for each good to find the labor allocations required to satisfy demand: \(x = 2l_x\) \(y = 3l_y\) Since we found that \(x = \frac{3}{7}y\), we can rewrite the relationship as: \(2l_x = \frac{3}{7} * 3l_y\) \(l_x = \frac{3}{7} * l_y\) Total labor available is 10 hours, so: \(l_x + l_y = 10\) Substituting the equation above, we get: \(\frac{3}{7} * l_y + l_y = 10\) \(l_y = \frac{35}{6}\) \(l_x = 10 - l_y = \frac{25}{6}\)
05

Summary

To summarize the exercise, we have found the following results: a. The price ratio, \(p_x / p_y\), must be \(\frac{3}{7}\). b. Smith and Jones will demand \(x = \frac{3}{7}(y_s + y_j)\) and \(y = y_s + y_j\). c. Labor should be allocated as follows: \(l_x = \frac{25}{6}\) hours for producing ice cream (x) and \(l_y = \frac{35}{6}\) hours for producing chicken soup (y).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Utility Maximization
Utility maximization is a fundamental concept in economics that explains how individuals choose among various options to achieve the highest level of satisfaction or 'utility'. When faced with limited resources, such as time or money, individuals allocate these resources to maximize their utility subject to those constraints.

In the context of the provided exercise, Smith and Jones are maximizing their utility by choosing the combination of ice cream (x) and chicken soup (y) that gives them the greatest satisfaction. This is calculated using their utility functions: for Smith, the utility function is given by \(U_{s}=x^{0.3} y^{0.7}\) and for Jones, it is \(U_{I}=x^{0.5} y^{0.5}\). The demand for products x and y, given the price ratio, results from their attempt to balance the utility received from each good with respect to its cost, ultimately determining the most utility-efficient way to spend their 10 hours of labor.
Price Ratio
Price ratio plays a critical role in an individual's decision-making process when faced with multiple goods or services to consume. It represents the relative price of one good in terms of another, which can influence the allocation of resources like labor or capital. The notion is central to consumer choice theory and allows economists to understand trade-offs that consumers face.

Within our exercise, the price ratio \(p_{x} / p_{y}\) is determined by the marginal rate of substitution, which equals the slope of the indifference curve at any point. This explains how much of one good a person would give up to obtain an additional unit of another, keeping utility constant. Since Smith and Jones are indifferent to producing x or y, their willingness to trade one for the other is captured by this price ratio, which is calculated to be \(3/7\). This ratio, in turn, influences how much x and y Smith and Jones will demand.
Labor Allocation
Labor allocation refers to the distribution of labor resources across different tasks or productions. It is an important concept in both personal decision-making and in the wider economy as it affects the overall output and efficiency of goods or services. Efficient labor allocation means that labor is used in such a way that it produces the maximum possible output.

In the scenario described in the exercise, Smith and Jones must decide how to allocate their 10 hours of labor between producing ice cream (x) and chicken soup (y) to satisfy demand while maximizing utility. The optimal allocation must take into account the productivity of labor in each task (given by the production functions), and the demand for x and y (dependent on the utility functions and price ratio). The exercise walks us through calculating that labor allocation mathematically to meet the determined demands effectively.
Production Functions
Production functions are mathematical equations that describe the relationship between inputs used in production and the resulting output. In the context of our exercise, the production function for each good, ice cream (x) and chicken soup (y), is given by \(x=2l\) and \(y=3l\) respectively, where \(l\) is the labor devoted to producing that good.

The production functions enable Smith and Jones to understand how much of each good can be produced given a certain amount of labor. This knowledge, combined with the utility functions and price ratio, informs how labor should be allocated to maximize utility. By matching the allocation of labor to the demands for x and y, as determined by the utility maximization problem, Smith and Jones can ensure that their limited labor resources are used in the most efficient way to produce goods.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the country of Ruritania there are two regions, \(A\) and \(B\). Two goods \((x \text { and } y)\) are produced in both regions. Production functions for region \(A\) are given by \\[ \begin{array}{l} x_{A}=\sqrt{l_{x}} \\ y_{A}=\sqrt{l_{y}} \end{array} \\] here \(l_{x}\) and \(l_{y}\) are the quantities of labor devoted to \(x\) and \(y\) production, respectively. Total labor available in region \(A\) is 100 units; that is, \\[ l_{x}+l_{y}=100 \\] Using a similar notation for region \(B\), production functions are given by \\[ \begin{array}{l} x_{B}=\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{l_{x}} \\ y_{B}=\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{l_{y}} \end{array} \\] There are also 100 units of labor available in region \(B\) ? \\[ l_{x}+l_{y}=100 \\] a. Calculate the production possibility curves for regions \(A\) and \(B\). b. What condition must hold if production in Ruritania is to be allocated efficiently between regions \(A\) and \(B\) (assuming labor cannot move from one region to the other \() ?\) c. Calculate the production possibility curve for Ruritania (again assuming labor is immobile between regions). How much total \(y\) can Ruritania produce if total \(x\) output is \(12 ?\) Hint: \(\mathrm{A}\) graphical analysis may be of some help here.

Suppose that Robinson Crusoe produces and consumes fish ( \(F\) ) and coconuts (C). Assume that, during a certain period, he has decided to work 200 hours and is indifferent as to whether he spends this time fishing or gathering coconuts. Robinson's production for fish is given by \\[ F=\sqrt{I_{F}} \\] and for coconuts by \\[ C=\sqrt{I_{C}} \\] where \(l_{F}\) and \(l_{C}\) are the number of hours spent fishing or gathering coconuts. Consequently, \\[ l_{c}+l_{F}=200 \\] Robinson Crusoe's utility for fish and coconuts is given by \\[ \text { utility }=\sqrt{F \cdot C} \\] a. If Robinson cannot trade with the rest of the world, how will he choose to allocate his labor? What will the optimal levels of \(F\) and \(C\) be? What will his utility be? What will be the \(R P T\) (of fish for coconuts)? b. Suppose now that trade is opened and Robinson can trade fish and coconuts at a price ratio of \(p_{F} / P_{C}=2 / 1 .\) If Robinson continues to produce the quantities of \(F\) and \(C\) from part (a), what will he choose to consume once given the opportunity to trade? What will his new level of utility be? c. How would your answer to part (b) change if Robinson adjusts his production to take advantage of the world prices? d. Graph your results for parts (a), (b), and (c).

The relationship between social welfare functions and the optimal distribution of individual tax burdens is a complex one in welfare economics. In this problem, we look at a few elements of this theory. Throughout we assume that there are \(m\) individuals in the economy and that each individual is characterized by a skill level, \(a_{p}\), which indicates his or her ability to earn income. Without loss of generality suppose also that individuals are ordered by increasing ability. Pretax income itself is determined by skill level and effort, \(c_{b}\) which may or may not be sensitive to taxation. That is, \(I_{i}=I\left(a_{b} c_{i}\right) .\) Suppose also that the utility cost of effort is given by \(\psi(c), \psi^{\prime}>0, \psi^{\prime \prime}<0, \psi(0)=0 .\) Finally, the government wishes to choose a schedule of income taxes and transfers, \(T(I),\) which maximizes social welfare subject to a government budget constraint satisfying \(\sum_{i=1}^{m} T\left(I_{i}\right)=R\) (where \(R\) is the amount needed to finance public goods). a Suppose that each individual's income is unaffected by effort and that each person's utility is given by \(u_{i}=u_{i}\left[I_{i}-T\left(I_{i}\right)-\right.\) \(\psi(c)]\). Show that maximization of a CES social welfare function requires perfect equality of income no matter what the precise form of that function. (Note: for some individuals \(T\left(I_{i}\right)\) may be negative.) b. Suppose now that individuals' incomes are affected by effort. Show that the results of part (a) still hold if the government based income taxation on \(a_{i}\) rather than on \(I_{i}\) c. In general show that if income taxation is based on observed income, this will affect the level of effort individuals undertake d. Characterization of the optimal tax structure when income is affected by effort is difficult and often counterintuitive. Diamond \(^{25}\) shows that the optimal marginal rate schedule may be U-shaped, with the highest rates for both low- and highincome people. He shows that the optimal top rate marginal rate is given by \\[ T^{\prime}\left(I_{\max }\right)=\frac{\left(1+e_{L, w}\right)\left(1-k_{i}\right)}{2 c_{L, w}+\left(1+e_{L, w}\right)\left(1-k_{i}\right)} \\] where \(k,\left(0 \leq k_{l} \leq 1\right)\) is the top income person's relative weight in the social welfare function and \(e_{L w}\) is the elasticity of labor supply with respect to the after-tax wage rate. Try a few simulations of possible values for these two parameters, and describe what the top marginal rate should be. Give an intuitive discussion of these results.

In Example 13.3 we showed how a Pareto efficiency exchange equilibrium can be described as the solution to a constrained maximum problem, In this problem we provide a similar illustration for an economy involving production. Suppose that there is only one person in a two-good economy and that his or her utility function is given by \(U(x, y)\). Suppose also that this economy's production possibility frontier can be written in implicit form as \(T(x, y)=0\) a. What is the constrained optimization problem that this economy will seek to solve if it wishes to make the best use of its available resources? b. What are the first-order conditions for a maximum in this situation? c. How would the efficient situation described in part (b) be brought about by a perfectly competitive system in which this individual maximizes utility and the firms underlying the production possibility frontier maximize profits. d. Under what situations might the first-order conditions described in part (b) not yield a utility maximum?

Consider an economy with just one technique available for the production of each good. \\[ \begin{array}{lcc} \text { Good } & \text { Food } & \text { Cloth } \\ \hline \text { Labor per unit output } & 1 & 1 \\ \text { Land per unit output } & 2 & 1 \\ \hline \end{array} \\] a. Suppose land is unlimited but labor equals 100 . Write and sketch the production possibility fronticr. b. Suppose labor is unlimited but land equals \(150 .\) Write and sketch the production possibility frontier. c. Suppose labor equals 100 and land equals \(150 .\) Write and sketch the production possibility frontier. Hint: What are the intercepts of the production possibility frontier? When is land fully employed? Labor? Both? Explain why the production possibility frontier of part (c) is concave. e. Sketch the relative price of food as a function of its output in part (c). f. If consumers insist on trading 4 units of food for 5 units of cloth, what is the relative price of food? Why? g. Explain why production is exactly the same at a price ratio of \(p_{F} / p_{C}=1.1\) as at \(p_{F} / p_{C}=1.9\) h. Suppose that capital is also required for producing food and clothing and that capital requirements per unit of food and per unit of clothing are 0.8 and \(0.9,\) respectively. There are 100 units of capital available. What is the production possibility curve in this case? Answer part (e) for this case.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free