Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose there are only three goods \(\left(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}\right)\) in an economy and that the excess demand functions for \(x_{2}\) and \(x_{3}\) are given by \\[ \begin{array}{l} E D_{2}=-\frac{3 p_{2}}{p_{1}}+\frac{2 p_{3}}{p_{1}}-1 \\ E D_{3}=-\frac{4 p_{2}}{p_{1}}-\frac{2 p_{3}}{p_{1}}-2 \end{array} \\] a Show that these functions are homogencous of degree 0 in \(p_{1}, p_{2},\) and \(p_{3}\) b. Use Walras' law to show that, if \(E D_{2}=E D_{3}=0,\) then \(E D_{1}\) must also be \(0 .\) Can you also use Walras' law to calculate \(E D_{1} ?\) c. Solve this system of equations for the equilibrium relative prices \(p_{2} / p_{1}\) and \(p_{3} / p_{1}\). What is the equilibrium value for \(p_{3} / p_{2} ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary, the excess demand functions for goods \(x_2\) and \(x_3\) are homogenous of degree 0 in prices. Walras' Law suggests that when the excess demand for goods \(x_2\) and \(x_3\) are zero, the excess demand for good \(x_1\) must also be zero. We cannot directly determine the excess demand function for \(x_1\) but know that \(E D_{1} = 0\) at equilibrium. After solving the given system of equations, we found that the equilibrium relative prices are \(p_{2}/p_{1}=\frac{1}{2}\) and \(p_{3}/p_{1}=1\), which gives a \(p_{3}/p_{2}\) value of 2.

Step by step solution

01

a. Check if excess demand functions are homogenous of degree 0

Homogenous of degree 0 means that if we multiply all the prices by any positive constant, the excess demand functions will remain the same. Let's say \(k>0\) is a constant, then we have: \\[ \begin{array}{l} E D_{2}(k p_{1}, k p_{2}, k p_{3})=-\frac{3 k p_{2}}{k p_{1}}+\frac{2 k p_{3}}{k p_{1}}-1 \\ E D_{3}(k p_{1}, k p_{2}, k p_{3})=-\frac{4 k p_{2}}{k p_{1}}-\frac{2 k p_{3}}{k p_{1}}-2 \end{array} \\] Simplifying the expressions, we see that the constant \(k\) cancels out: \\[ \begin{array}{l} E D_{2}(k p_{1}, k p_{2}, k p_{3})=-\frac{3 p_{2}}{p_{1}}+\frac{2 p_{3}}{p_{1}}-1 \\ E D_{3}(k p_{1}, k p_{2}, k p_{3})=-\frac{4 p_{2}}{p_{1}}-\frac{2 p_{3}}{p_{1}}-2 \end{array} \\] These functions are the same as the original excess demand functions, so they are homogenous of degree 0 in prices.
02

b. Apply Walras' Law to show \(E D_{1}\) must be 0 and try to directly calculate it

Walras' law states that the sum of the values of excess demand (quantity multiplied by price) for all goods in an economy is always equal to zero: \(p_{1}E D_{1} + p_{2}E D_{2} + p_{3}E D_{3} = 0\). We are given that \(E D_{2}=E D_{3}=0\), so: \\[ p_{1}E D_{1} + p_{2}(0) + p_{3}(0) = 0 \\ p_{1}E D_{1} = 0 \\] Since \(p_{1}\) is a price, it cannot be zero, which means that \(E D_{1} = 0\). Unfortunately, we cannot directly calculate the \(E D_{1}\) function using Walras' law without knowing the excess demand function for \(x_1\). But we can conclude that it must be zero when \(E D_{2}\) and \(E D_{3}\) are zero.
03

c. Solve the system of equations for equilibrium relative prices and find \(p_{3}/p_{2}\)

In equilibrium, excess demand for both goods \(x_2\) and \(x_3\) will be zero. Thus, \\[ \begin{cases} -\frac{3p_{2}}{p_{1}}+\frac{2p_{3}}{p_{1}} - 1 = 0 \\ -\frac{4p_{2}}{p_{1}}-\frac{2p_{3}}{p_{1}} - 2 = 0 \end{cases} \\] Solve for \(p_{2}/p_{1}\) and \(p_{3}/p_{1}\): The first equation gives: \\[ \frac{2p_{3}}{p_{1}} = \frac{3p_{2}}{p_{1}}-1 \\] The second equation gives: \\[ \frac{2p_{3}}{p_{1}} = \frac{4p_{2}}{p_{1}}-2 \\] From the first equation, eliminate the \(p_{1}\) from the fraction by dividing both sides by 2: \\[ \frac{p_{3}}{p_{1}} = \frac{3p_{2}}{2p_{1}}-\frac{1}{2} \\] From the second equation, eliminate the \(p_{1}\) from the fraction: \\[ \frac{p_{3}}{p_{1}} = \frac{4p_{2}}{2p_{1}}-1 \\] Now we can equate the two expressions for \(p_{3}/p_{1}\): \\[ \frac{3p_{2}}{2p_{1}}-\frac{1}{2} = \frac{4p_{2}}{2p_{1}}-1 \\] Solving the equation, we get \(p_{2}/p_{1}=\frac{1}{2}\). By substituting this value to the expression for \(p_{3}/p_{1}\), we obtain \(p_{3}/p_{1}=1\). Finally, we find the equilibrium value for \(p_{3}/p_{2}\): \\[ \frac{p_{3}/p_{1}}{p_{2}/p_{1}} = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{2}} = 2 \\] So, in equilibrium, \(p_{3}/p_{2}=2\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that Robinson Crusoe produces and consumes fish ( \(F\) ) and coconuts (C). Assume that, during a certain period, he has decided to work 200 hours and is indifferent as to whether he spends this time fishing or gathering coconuts. Robinson's production for fish is given by \\[ F=\sqrt{I_{F}} \\] and for coconuts by \\[ C=\sqrt{I_{C}} \\] where \(l_{F}\) and \(l_{C}\) are the number of hours spent fishing or gathering coconuts. Consequently, \\[ l_{c}+l_{F}=200 \\] Robinson Crusoe's utility for fish and coconuts is given by \\[ \text { utility }=\sqrt{F \cdot C} \\] a. If Robinson cannot trade with the rest of the world, how will he choose to allocate his labor? What will the optimal levels of \(F\) and \(C\) be? What will his utility be? What will be the \(R P T\) (of fish for coconuts)? b. Suppose now that trade is opened and Robinson can trade fish and coconuts at a price ratio of \(p_{F} / P_{C}=2 / 1 .\) If Robinson continues to produce the quantities of \(F\) and \(C\) from part (a), what will he choose to consume once given the opportunity to trade? What will his new level of utility be? c. How would your answer to part (b) change if Robinson adjusts his production to take advantage of the world prices? d. Graph your results for parts (a), (b), and (c).

The construction of the production possibility curve shown in Figures 13.2 and 13.3 can be used to illustrate three important "theorems" in international trade theory. To get started, notice in Figure 13.2 that the efficiency line \(O_{x}, O_{y}\) is bowed above the main diagonal of the Edgeworth box. This shows that the production of good \(x\) is always "capital intensive" relative to the production of good \(y\). That is, when production is efficient, \(\left(\frac{5}{7}\right)_{x}>\left(\frac{5}{1}\right)\), no matter how much of the goods are produced. Demonstration of the trade theorems assumes that the price ratio, \(p=p_{x} / p_{y}\) is determined in international markets-the domestic economy must adjust to this ratio (in trade jargon, the country under examination is assumed to be "a small country in a large world"). a Factor price equalization theorem: Use Figure 13.4 to show how the international price ratio, \(p\), determines the point in the Edgeworth box at which domestic production will take place. Show how this determines the factor price ratio, \(w / v\). If production functions are the same throughout the world, what will this imply about relative factor prices throughout the world? b. Stolper-Samuelson theorem: An increase in \(p\) will cause the production to move clockwise along the production possibility frontier \(-x\) production will increase and \(y\) production will decrease. Use the Edgeworth box diagram to show that such a move will decrease \(k / l\) in the production of both goods. Explain why this will cause \(w / v\) to decrease. What are the implications of this for the opening of trade relations (which typically increases the price of the good produced intensively with a country's most abundant input). c. Rybczynski theorem: Suppose again that \(p\) is set by external markets and does not change. Show that an increase in \(k\) will increase the output of \(x\) (the capital-intensive good) and reduce the output of \(y\) (the labor-intensive good).

Suppose the production possibility frontier for guns \((x)\) and butter \((y)\) is given by \\[ x^{2}+2 y^{2}=900 \\] a. Graph this frontier. b. If individuals always prefer consumption bundles in which \(y=2 x\), how much \(x\) and \(y\) will be produced? c. At the point described in part (b), what will be the \(R P T\) and hence what price ratio will cause production to take place at that point? (This slope should be approximated by considering small changes in \(x\) and \(y\) around the optimal point.) d. Show your solution on the figure from part (a).

Smith and Jones are stranded on a desert island. Each has in his possession some slices of ham \((H)\) and cheese (C). Smith is a choosy eater and will eat ham and cheese only in the fixed proportions of 2 slices of cheese to 1 slice of ham. His utility function is given by \(U_{s}=\min (H, C / 2)\) Jones is more flexible in his dietary tastes and has a utility function given by \(U_{j}=4 H+3 C\). Total endowments are 100 slices of ham and 200 slices of cheese. a. Draw the Edgeworth box diagram that represents the possibilitics for exchange in this situation. What is the only exchange ratio that can prevail in any equilibrium? b. Suppose Smith initially had \(40 \mathrm{H}\) and \(80 \mathrm{C}\). What would the equilibrium position be? c. Suppose Smith initially had \(60 H\) and \(80 C\). What would the equilibrium position be? d. Suppose Smith (much the stronger of the two) decides not to play by the rules of the game. Then what could the final equilibrium position be?

Consider an economy with just one technique available for the production of each good. \\[ \begin{array}{lcc} \text { Good } & \text { Food } & \text { Cloth } \\ \hline \text { Labor per unit output } & 1 & 1 \\ \text { Land per unit output } & 2 & 1 \\ \hline \end{array} \\] a. Suppose land is unlimited but labor equals 100 . Write and sketch the production possibility fronticr. b. Suppose labor is unlimited but land equals \(150 .\) Write and sketch the production possibility frontier. c. Suppose labor equals 100 and land equals \(150 .\) Write and sketch the production possibility frontier. Hint: What are the intercepts of the production possibility frontier? When is land fully employed? Labor? Both? Explain why the production possibility frontier of part (c) is concave. e. Sketch the relative price of food as a function of its output in part (c). f. If consumers insist on trading 4 units of food for 5 units of cloth, what is the relative price of food? Why? g. Explain why production is exactly the same at a price ratio of \(p_{F} / p_{C}=1.1\) as at \(p_{F} / p_{C}=1.9\) h. Suppose that capital is also required for producing food and clothing and that capital requirements per unit of food and per unit of clothing are 0.8 and \(0.9,\) respectively. There are 100 units of capital available. What is the production possibility curve in this case? Answer part (e) for this case.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free