Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose the production possibility frontier for guns \((x)\) and butter \((y)\) is given by \\[ x^{2}+2 y^{2}=900 \\] a. Graph this frontier. b. If individuals always prefer consumption bundles in which \(y=2 x\), how much \(x\) and \(y\) will be produced? c. At the point described in part (b), what will be the \(R P T\) and hence what price ratio will cause production to take place at that point? (This slope should be approximated by considering small changes in \(x\) and \(y\) around the optimal point.) d. Show your solution on the figure from part (a).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The optimal consumption mix is (10, 20) with an RPT of 1/4, and the corresponding price ratio is 1:4, meaning the price of 1 unit of \(x\) is 1/4 the price of 1 unit of \(y\).

Step by step solution

01

Graph the PPF

To graph the Production Possibility Frontier (PPF) given by the equation \(x^2 + 2y^2 = 900\), we can rewrite the equation in terms of \(y\) as follows: \[y = \sqrt{\frac{900-x^2}{2}}\] Graph this equation to create the PPF, which will resemble an ellipse.
02

Optimal consumption mix

We are given a consumption preference equation: \(y = 2x\). To find the optimal consumption mix with respect to the PPF, we can substitute the consumption equation into the PPF equation: \[x^2 + 2(2x)^2 = 900\] Solving for \(x\): \[x^2 + 8x^2 = 900\] \[9x^2 = 900\] \[x^2 = \frac{900}{9}\] \[x^2 = 100\] \[x = 10\] Now, we can substitute the value of \(x\) back into the consumption equation to find the value of \(y\): \[y = 2(10)\] \[y = 20\] The optimal consumption mix will be \((x, y) = (10, 20)\).
03

Calculate RPT and price ratio

To find the RPT (Relative Price Tangency) at the optimal consumption mix \((x, y) = (10, 20)\), we need to find the slope of the PPF at that point. We can do that by differentiating the PPF equation with respect to \(x\) and plugging in the optimal consumption mix: \[\frac{d y}{d x} = -\frac{x}{2y}\] At \((x, y) = (10, 20)\), the slope is: \[\frac{d y}{d x} = -\frac{10}{2\cdot 20}\] \[\frac{d y}{d x} = -\frac{1}{4}\] The RPT is equal to the absolute value of the slope at the optimal consumption mix: \[RPT = \frac{1}{4}\] Therefore, the price ratio that will cause production to take place at the optimal point is given by the RPT, which is \(1:4\), or \(\frac{1}{4}\), i.e., the price of 1 unit of \(x\) is 1/4 of the price of 1 unit of \(y\).
04

Show the solution on the graph

On the graph with the PPF from Step 1, plot the point \((10, 20)\) as the optimal consumption mix. Draw a tangent line with slope \(-\frac{1}{4}\) at this point, illustrating the RPT and price ratio as they relate to the PPF and consumption preference. The tangent line represents the trade-offs between producing \(x\) and \(y\) at the optimal point.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Microeconomic Theory
Microeconomic theory is the branch of economics that focuses on the actions of individuals and firms, as well as the outcome of these actions on the markets for goods and services. It analyzes how these entities make decisions to allocate limited resources, typically aiming to optimize their gains or benefits. One key aspect of microeconomics is the concept of the production possibility frontier (PPF), which represents the various combinations of two goods or services that can be produced within an economy, given fixed resources and technology.

The PPF provides insights into trade-offs and the concept of opportunity cost—the cost of forgoing the next best alternative when making a decision. For example, as shown in the textbook exercise, an economy that produces more guns (x) would have to produce less butter (y), since the resources are limited, which is depicted by the specific shape of the PPF curve. The curve is typically bowed outwards because resources are not perfectly adaptable to the production of both goods, which reflects the increasing opportunity cost.
Optimal Consumption Mix
The optimal consumption mix refers to the combination of goods and services that maximizes a consumer’s satisfaction or utility, given their income and the prices of goods and services. In the context of the PPF, the optimal consumption point is where a consumer's preference, or indifference curve, is tangent to the PPF curve. This represents the highest level of satisfaction obtainable without exceeding the productive capabilities of the economy.

In the exercise provided, the optimal mix is identified by the preference equation, where the consumer prefers twice as much butter (y) as guns (x), indicated by the equation \(y = 2x\). By solving this preference equation along with the PPF equation, we determined that the optimal consumption mix for this particular preference is 10 units of guns (x) and 20 units of butter (y). This mix lies on the PPF, ensuring that it's a producible and efficient combination.
Relative Price Tangency
Relative price tangency occurs when the slope of the PPF, which represents the opportunity cost of one good in terms of another, is equal to the slope of a consumer's indifference curve, which represents their marginal rate of substitution (MRS). In mathematical terms, the point of tangency reflects the balance where the trade-off between the goods in production matches the consumer's preference trade-off.

In the exercise, the relative price tangency is calculated as the relative price of one gun to one unit of butter. This can be determined using the concept of the Relative Price Tangency (RPT), which in our example is the slope of the PPF at the optimal consumption point (10, 20). By differentiating the PPF equation and substituting the optimal values, we find that the RPT and hence the price ratio at this point is \(1:4\), meaning that in this economy, producing one additional unit of guns costs four units of butter.
PPF Graphing
Graphing a PPF involves plotting the possible quantities of two different goods that an economy can produce with its available resources and technology. The shape of the PPF is determined by the production function outlined in the given scenario. The PPF curve provides a visual tool for understanding production constraints, efficiency, and the trade-offs between the two goods.

In the exercise, the PPF is graphed using the equation \(x^2 + 2y^2 = 900\), resulting in an elliptical shape due to the differing coefficients of x and y in the equation. This indicates that the resources are not equally efficient in producing both goods. To display the solution graphically, one would illustrate point (10, 20) on the curve and draw a tangent line at that point. The slope of the tangent line (RPT) reflects the opportunity cost of the goods at the point of optimal consumption, providing a clear visual representation of the price ratio needed to sustain that production point in the economy.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Smith and Jones are stranded on a desert island. Each has in his possession some slices of ham \((H)\) and cheese (C). Smith is a choosy eater and will eat ham and cheese only in the fixed proportions of 2 slices of cheese to 1 slice of ham. His utility function is given by \(U_{s}=\min (H, C / 2)\) Jones is more flexible in his dietary tastes and has a utility function given by \(U_{j}=4 H+3 C\). Total endowments are 100 slices of ham and 200 slices of cheese. a. Draw the Edgeworth box diagram that represents the possibilitics for exchange in this situation. What is the only exchange ratio that can prevail in any equilibrium? b. Suppose Smith initially had \(40 \mathrm{H}\) and \(80 \mathrm{C}\). What would the equilibrium position be? c. Suppose Smith initially had \(60 H\) and \(80 C\). What would the equilibrium position be? d. Suppose Smith (much the stronger of the two) decides not to play by the rules of the game. Then what could the final equilibrium position be?

In the country of Ruritania there are two regions, \(A\) and \(B\). Two goods \((x \text { and } y)\) are produced in both regions. Production functions for region \(A\) are given by \\[ \begin{array}{l} x_{A}=\sqrt{l_{x}} \\ y_{A}=\sqrt{l_{y}} \end{array} \\] here \(l_{x}\) and \(l_{y}\) are the quantities of labor devoted to \(x\) and \(y\) production, respectively. Total labor available in region \(A\) is 100 units; that is, \\[ l_{x}+l_{y}=100 \\] Using a similar notation for region \(B\), production functions are given by \\[ \begin{array}{l} x_{B}=\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{l_{x}} \\ y_{B}=\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{l_{y}} \end{array} \\] There are also 100 units of labor available in region \(B\) ? \\[ l_{x}+l_{y}=100 \\] a. Calculate the production possibility curves for regions \(A\) and \(B\). b. What condition must hold if production in Ruritania is to be allocated efficiently between regions \(A\) and \(B\) (assuming labor cannot move from one region to the other \() ?\) c. Calculate the production possibility curve for Ruritania (again assuming labor is immobile between regions). How much total \(y\) can Ruritania produce if total \(x\) output is \(12 ?\) Hint: \(\mathrm{A}\) graphical analysis may be of some help here.

Suppose there are only three goods \(\left(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}\right)\) in an economy and that the excess demand functions for \(x_{2}\) and \(x_{3}\) are given by \\[ \begin{array}{l} E D_{2}=-\frac{3 p_{2}}{p_{1}}+\frac{2 p_{3}}{p_{1}}-1 \\ E D_{3}=-\frac{4 p_{2}}{p_{1}}-\frac{2 p_{3}}{p_{1}}-2 \end{array} \\] a Show that these functions are homogencous of degree 0 in \(p_{1}, p_{2},\) and \(p_{3}\) b. Use Walras' law to show that, if \(E D_{2}=E D_{3}=0,\) then \(E D_{1}\) must also be \(0 .\) Can you also use Walras' law to calculate \(E D_{1} ?\) c. Solve this system of equations for the equilibrium relative prices \(p_{2} / p_{1}\) and \(p_{3} / p_{1}\). What is the equilibrium value for \(p_{3} / p_{2} ?\)

The construction of the production possibility curve shown in Figures 13.2 and 13.3 can be used to illustrate three important "theorems" in international trade theory. To get started, notice in Figure 13.2 that the efficiency line \(O_{x}, O_{y}\) is bowed above the main diagonal of the Edgeworth box. This shows that the production of good \(x\) is always "capital intensive" relative to the production of good \(y\). That is, when production is efficient, \(\left(\frac{5}{7}\right)_{x}>\left(\frac{5}{1}\right)\), no matter how much of the goods are produced. Demonstration of the trade theorems assumes that the price ratio, \(p=p_{x} / p_{y}\) is determined in international markets-the domestic economy must adjust to this ratio (in trade jargon, the country under examination is assumed to be "a small country in a large world"). a Factor price equalization theorem: Use Figure 13.4 to show how the international price ratio, \(p\), determines the point in the Edgeworth box at which domestic production will take place. Show how this determines the factor price ratio, \(w / v\). If production functions are the same throughout the world, what will this imply about relative factor prices throughout the world? b. Stolper-Samuelson theorem: An increase in \(p\) will cause the production to move clockwise along the production possibility frontier \(-x\) production will increase and \(y\) production will decrease. Use the Edgeworth box diagram to show that such a move will decrease \(k / l\) in the production of both goods. Explain why this will cause \(w / v\) to decrease. What are the implications of this for the opening of trade relations (which typically increases the price of the good produced intensively with a country's most abundant input). c. Rybczynski theorem: Suppose again that \(p\) is set by external markets and does not change. Show that an increase in \(k\) will increase the output of \(x\) (the capital-intensive good) and reduce the output of \(y\) (the labor-intensive good).

In Example 13.3 we showed how a Pareto efficiency exchange equilibrium can be described as the solution to a constrained maximum problem, In this problem we provide a similar illustration for an economy involving production. Suppose that there is only one person in a two-good economy and that his or her utility function is given by \(U(x, y)\). Suppose also that this economy's production possibility frontier can be written in implicit form as \(T(x, y)=0\) a. What is the constrained optimization problem that this economy will seek to solve if it wishes to make the best use of its available resources? b. What are the first-order conditions for a maximum in this situation? c. How would the efficient situation described in part (b) be brought about by a perfectly competitive system in which this individual maximizes utility and the firms underlying the production possibility frontier maximize profits. d. Under what situations might the first-order conditions described in part (b) not yield a utility maximum?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free