Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that the market demand for a product is given by \(Q_{D}=A-B P .\) Suppose also that the typical firm's cost function is given by \(C(q)=k+a q+b q^{2}\) a. Compute the long-run equilibrium output and price for the typical firm in this market. b. Calculate the equilibrium number of firms in this market as a function of all the parameters in this problem. c. Describe how changes in the demand parameters \(A\) and \(B\) affect the equilibrium number of firms in this market. Explain your results intuitively. d. Describe how the parameters of the typical firm's cost function affect the long-run equilibrium number of firms in this example. Explain your results intuitively.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary, the long-run equilibrium output, price, and the number of firms in the market are affected by different parameters from the market demand function and the cost function for a typical firm. By analyzing and solving the demand and cost functions, we can derive the optimal output, price, and a function for the equilibrium number of firms in the market. The impacts of changes in demand and cost function parameters on the equilibrium number of firms are generally intuitive, with higher demand or lower costs leading to more firms operating in the market. However, the relative magnitudes of changes in these parameters will depend on the specific interactions between the demand curve, cost function, and market conditions.

Step by step solution

01

a. Compute the long-run equilibrium output and price for the typical firm in this market.

To compute the long-run equilibrium output and price for the typical firm in this market, we first need to find the marginal cost (MC) for a firm. This is found by taking the derivative of the cost function (C(q)) with respect to q. Suppose that the market demand is given by \(Q_{D} = A - B P\), and the cost function for the typical firm is given by \(C(q) = k + a q + b q^{2}\). Differentiating the cost function with respect to q, we get: \(\text{MC} = \frac{dC(q)}{dq} = a + 2bq\) Now, in the long-run equilibrium, the firm maximizes its profit, which implies that marginal cost (MC) is equal to the market price (P). Therefore, we have: \(P = a + 2bq\) Since we have the market demand function, we can substitute the price in terms of q to obtain the optimal output for the firm: \(Q_{D} = A - B(a + 2bq)\) Solving for q, we get the optimal output for a firm: \(q^{*} = \frac{A - Ba}{2Bb + B}\) We can now plug \(q^{*}\) back into the price function to determine the long-run equilibrium price: \(P^{*} = a + 2bq^{*} = a + 2b\left(\frac{A - Ba}{2Bb + B}\right)\)
02

b. Calculate the equilibrium number of firms in this market as a function of all the parameters in this problem.

Now that we have the optimal output for a typical firm (\(q^{*}\)) and the market demand function (\(Q_{D} = A - BP\)), we can calculate the equilibrium number of firms (n) in this market as follows: First, note that in equilibrium, the total quantity supplied in the market will be equal to the total quantity demanded. The total quantity supplied is the product of the quantity produced by each firm and the number of firms (n). Thus, we have: \(nq^{*} = Q_{D}\) Now, we can plug the expressions we derived in part (a) for \(q^{*}\) and \(Q_{D}\): \(n\left(\frac{A - Ba}{2Bb + B}\right) = A - B\left(a + 2b\left(\frac{A - Ba}{2Bb + B}\right)\right)\) Solving for n, we get the equilibrium number of firms in this market as a function of all the parameters in this problem: \(n = \frac{(2Bb + B)(A - Ba)}{A(2Bb - B) + B^{2}a}\)
03

c. Describe how changes in the demand parameters \(A\) and \(B\) affect the equilibrium number of firms in this market. Explain your results intuitively.

We can analyze the impact of changes in the demand parameters \(A\) and \(B\) on the equilibrium number of firms by looking at the expression we derived for n: \(n = \frac{(2Bb + B)(A - Ba)}{A(2Bb - B) + B^{2}a}\) 1. Impact of change in \(A\): From the expression for n, we can see that the equilibrium number of firms in the market is positively related to the demand parameter A. This implies that when A increases, the number of firms in the market will increase. This can be explained intuitively as an increase in A represents a shift of the demand curve to the right which means that consumers demand more products at each price level. As a result, market equilibrium changes and the number of firms needed to meet the new market demand also increases. 2. Impact of change in \(B\): The impact of B on the number of firms is not as straightforward. The term \((2Bb + B)\) on the numerator has a positive relationship with B, while the denominator term, \(A(2Bb - B) + B^{2}a\), has a negative relationship with B. Therefore, the overall impact of B on the equilibrium number of firms will depend on the values of A, a, and b. However, the main intuition can be derived from B's impact on the slope of the demand curve. An increase in B makes the demand curve steeper (more inelastic), leading to a larger decrease in the quantity demanded when price increases. Hence, the overall change in the number of firms due to a change in B will depend on the market's response to changes in price.
04

d. Describe how the parameters of the typical firm's cost function affect the long-run equilibrium number of firms in this example. Explain your results intuitively.

We can analyze the impact of the cost function parameters, a and b, on the equilibrium number of firms by looking at the expression we derived for n: \(n = \frac{(2Bb + B)(A - Ba)}{A(2Bb - B) + B^{2}a}\) 1. Impact of change in \(a\): From the expression for n, we can observe that the equilibrium number of firms in the market is negatively related to the cost parameter a. This means that when a increases, the number of firms in the market decreases. This result can be explained intuitively as an increase in a represents an increase in the marginal cost of production for the firm, making it more expensive to produce additional units. As a consequence, fewer firms will operate profitably in the market, and the equilibrium number of firms will decrease. 2. Impact of change in \(b\): The impact of b on the number of firms is more complex. The term \((2Bb + B)\) on the numerator shows a positive relationship with b, while the denominator term, \(A(2Bb - B) + B^{2}a\), has a positive relationship with b as well. This means that the overall effect of b on the number of firms will depend on the relative magnitudes of these effects. The key intuition behind this result lies in the fact that an increase in b represents an increase in the curvature of the cost function. As a result, the shape of the cost function changes, which in turn alters the relationship between output, price, and the number of firms in the long-run equilibrium.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that the demand for stilts is given by \\[ Q=1,500-50 P \\] and that the long-run total operating costs of each stilt-making firm in a competitive industry are given by \\[ C(q)=0.5 q^{2}-10 q \\] Entrepreneurial talent for stilt making is scarce. The supply curve for entrepreneurs is given by \\[ Q_{S}=0.25 w \\] where \(w\) is the annual wage paid. Suppose also that each stilt-making firm requires one (and only one) entrepreneur (hence the quantity of entrepreneurs hired is equal to the number of firms). Long-run total costs for each firm are then given by \\[ C(q, w)=0.5 q^{2}-10 q+w \\] a. What is the long-run equilibrium quantity of stilts produced? How many stilts are produced by each firm? What is the long-run equilibrium price of stilts? How many firms will there be? How many entrepreneurs will be hired, and what is their wage? b. Suppose that the demand for stilts shifts outward to \\[ Q=2,428-50 P \\] How would you now answer the questions posed in part (a)? c. Because stilt-making entrepreneurs are the cause of the upward-sloping long-run supply curve in this problem, they will receive all rents generated as industry output expands. Calculate the increase in rents between parts (a) and (b). Show that this value is identical to the change in long-run producer surplus as measured along the stilt supply curve.

The perfectly competitive videotape-copying industry is composed of many firms that can copy five tapes per day at an average cost of \(\$ 10\) per tape. Each firm must also pay a royalty to film studios, and the per-film royalty rate \((r)\) is an increasing function of total industry output (Q): \\[ r=0.002 Q \\] Demand is given by \\[ Q=1,050-50 P \\] a. Assuming the industry is in long-run equilibrium, what will be the equilibrium price and quantity of copied tapes? How many tape firms will there be? What will the per-film royalty rate be? b. Suppose that demand for copied tapes increases to \\[ Q=1,600-50 P \\] In this case, what is the long-run equilibrium price and quantity for copied tapes? How many tape firms are there? What is the per-film royalty rate? c. Graph these long-run equilibria in the tape market, and calculate the increase in producer surplus between the situations described in parts (a) and (b). d. Show that the increase in producer surplus is precisely equal to the increase in royalties paid as \(Q\) expands incrementally from its level in part (b) to its level in part (c). e. Suppose that the government institutes a \(\$ 5.50\) per-film tax on the film-copying industry. Assuming that the demand for copied films is that given in part (a), how will this tax affect the market equilibrium? f. How will the burden of this tax be allocated between consumers and producers? What will be the loss of consumer and producer surplus? g. Show that the loss of producer surplus as a result of this tax is borne completely by the film studios. Explain your result intuitively.

Suppose there are 1,000 identical firms producing diamonds. Let the total cost function for each firm be given by \\[ C(q, w)=q^{2}+w q \\] where \(q\) is the firm's output level and \(w\) is the wage rate of diamond cutters. a. If \(w=10\), what will be the firm's (short-run) supply curve? What is the industry's supply curve? How many diamonds will be produced at a price of 20 each? How many more diamonds would be produced at a price of \(21 ?\) b. Suppose the wages of diamond cutters depend on the total quantity of diamonds produced, and suppose the form of this relationship is given by \\[ w=0.002 Q \\] here \(Q\) represents total industry output, which is 1,000 times the output of the typical firm. In this situation, show that the firm's marginal cost (and short-run supply) curve depends on \(Q\). What is the industry supply curve? How much will be produced at a price of \(20 ?\) How much more will be produced at a price of \(21 ?\) What do you conclude about the shape of the short-run supply curve?

Throughout this chapter's analysis of taxes we have used per-unit taxes-that is, a tax of a fixed amount for each unit traded in the market. A similar analysis would hold for ad valorem taxes-that is, taxes on the value of the transaction (or, what amounts to the same thing, proportional taxes on price). Given an ad valorem tax rate of \(t(t=0.05 \text { for a } 5\) percent tax), the gap between the price demanders pay and what suppliers receive is given by \(P_{D}=(1+t) P_{S}\) a. Show that for an ad valorem tax \\[ \frac{d \ln P_{D}}{d t}=\frac{e_{S}}{e_{S}-e_{D}} \quad \text { and } \quad \frac{d \ln P_{S}}{d t}=\frac{e_{D}}{e_{S}-e_{D}} \\] b. Show that the excess burden of a small tax is \\[ D W=-0.5 \frac{e_{D} e_{S}}{e_{S}-e_{D}} t^{2} P_{0} Q_{0} \\] c. Compare these results with those derived in this chapter for a unit tax.

The domestic demand for portable radios is given by $$Q=5,000-100 \mathrm{P}$$ where price \(\mathrm{(P)}\) is measured in dollars and quantity \(\mathrm{(Q)}\) is measured in thousands of radios per year. The domestic supply curve for radios is given by $$Q=150 \mathrm{P}$$ a. What is the domestic equilibrium in the portable radio market? b. Suppose portable radios can be imported at a world price of $$\$ 10$$ per radio. If trade were unencumbered, what would the new market equilibrium be? How many portable radios would be imported? c. If domestic portable radio producers succeeded in having a $$\$ 5$$ tariff implemented, how would this change the market equilibrium? How much would be collected in tariff revenues? How much consumer surplus would be transferred to domestic producers? What would the deadweight loss from the tariff be? d. How would your results from part (c) be changed if the government reached an agreement with foreign suppliers to "voluntarily" limit the portable radios they export to \(1,250,000\) per year? Explain how this differs from the case of a tariff.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free