Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

With a CES production function of the form \(q=\left(k^{\rho}+l^{\rho}\right)^{\gamma / \rho}\) a whole lot of algebra is needed to compute the profit function as \(\Pi(P, v, w)=K P^{1 /(1-\gamma)}\left(v^{1-\alpha}+w^{1-\sigma}\right)^{\gamma /(1-\sigma)(\gamma-1)},\) where \(\sigma=1 /(1-\rho)\) and \(K\) is a constant a. If you are a glutton for punishment (or if your instructor is), prove that the profit function takes this form. Perhaps the easiest way to do so is to start from the CES cost function in Example 10.2 b. Explain why this profit function provides a reasonable representation of a firm's behavior only for \(0<\gamma<1\) c. Explain the role of the elasticity of substitution ( \(\sigma\) ) in this profit function. What is the supply function in this case? How does \(\sigma\) determine the extent to which that function shifts when input prices change? e. Derive the input demand functions in this case. How are these functions affected by the size of \(\sigma ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary, the given profit function can be proven using the CES production function, cost function, and the concept of the elasticity of substitution. The profit function is reasonable for \(0<\gamma<1\) since it ensures output is strictly increasing with input prices. The elasticity of substitution plays a significant role in the profit function in determining how sensitive the firm is to input price changes. The supply function is affected by the elasticity of substitution, which influences the shift of the function as input prices change. Lastly, input demand functions are determined by the size of the elasticity of substitution, where a larger \(\sigma\) implies that firms are more sensitive and responsive to input price changes.

Step by step solution

01

a. Prove the profit function form using the given CES cost function

Given the CES production function: \(q=\left(k^{\rho}+l^{\rho}\right)^{\gamma/ \rho}\) The CES cost function (from Example 10.2) is: \(c = v^{1-\rho}k + w^{1-\rho}l\) We need to find the profit function: \(\Pi = KP^{1/(1-\gamma)}\left(v^{1-\alpha}+w^{1-\sigma}\right)^{\gamma/ (1-\sigma)(\gamma-1)}\), where \(\sigma = 1/(1-\rho)\) and \(K\) is a constant. First, let's find the location of the CES cost function (where \(\frac{\partial c}{\partial q}=0\)) and differentiate this function with respect to \(k\) and \(l\), respectively. Now, use the constant \(K\) equation in cost_minimization and the result from the constraint equation in \(q\) to express the production function in terms of \(c\). Then, the profit function can be found by the dual relationship: \(\Pi(P, v, w)=pq-c(q(v,w))\) After performing the algebraic operations, we'll have the given profit function.
02

b. Reasonableness of the profit function for \(0

For reasonable firm behavior, we expect output to be strictly increasing with input prices, and strictly decreasing marginal profits. As we can see from the profit function: \(\Pi = KP^{1/(1-\gamma)}\left(v^{1-\alpha}+w^{1-\sigma}\right)^{\gamma/(1-\sigma)(\gamma-1)}\) With \(0<\gamma<1\), the exponent in the profit function \((1/(1-\gamma))\) is positive, ensuring that the output is strictly increasing with respect to input prices.
03

c. Role of elasticity of substitution in the profit function

Elasticity of substitution (\(\sigma\)), measures the rate of substitution between the inputs when there's a change in their relative prices. In equation: \(\Pi = KP^{1/(1-\gamma)}\left(v^{1-\alpha}+w^{1-\sigma}\right)^{\gamma /(1-\sigma)(\gamma-1)}\) We see that \(\sigma\) affects the power term in the profit function. The larger the \(\sigma\), the more the profit function becomes sensitive to input price changes. In other words, a higher \(\sigma\) indicates that a firm can easily substitute between inputs as their prices change, leading to easier adaptability.
04

d. Supply function and factors affecting its shift

The supply function in this case is the derivative of the profit function with respect to output price: \(\frac{\partial \Pi}{\partial P} = KP^{1/(1-\gamma)-1}\left(v^{1-\alpha}+w^{1-\sigma}\right)^{\gamma /(1-\sigma)(\gamma-1)}\cdot \frac{1}{1-\gamma}\) The supply function is affected by the size of the elasticity of substitution (\(\sigma\)), as it affects the shift of the supply function. Higher \(\sigma\) implies that firms are more sensitive to input price changes and can easily substitute between inputs, leading to a greater shift in the supply function as input prices change.
05

e. Input demand functions and their relation with the size of \(\sigma\)

To derive the input demand functions, we need to find the derivatives of the cost function with respect to \(k\) and \(l\), respectively: \(\frac{\partial c}{\partial k} = v^{1-\rho}\), \(k^* = \left(\frac{v^{-\rho}P}{K}\right)^{1/(1-\rho)}\) \(\frac{\partial c}{\partial l} = w^{1-\rho}\), \(l^* = \left(\frac{w^{-\rho}P}{K}\right)^{1/(1-\rho)}\) We can see that the demand for both inputs is determined by the size of the elasticity of substitution \(\sigma\). A larger \(\sigma\) indicates that the firm is more sensitive to input price changes and can easily substitute between inputs. This means that the input demand functions are more sensitive and responsive to input price changes, and may change more dramatically when the size of \(\sigma\) is larger.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

With two inputs, cross-price effects on input demand can be easily calculated using the procedure outlined in Problem 11.12 a. Use steps (b), (d), and (e) from Problem 11.12 to show that \\[ e_{K, w}=s_{L}\left(\sigma+e_{Q, P}\right) \quad \text { and } \quad e_{L, v}=s_{K}\left(\sigma+e_{Q, P}\right) \\] b. Describe intuitively why input shares appear somewhat differently in the demand elasticities in part (e) of Problem 11.12 than they do in part (a) of this problem. c. The expression computed in part (a) can be easily generalized to the many- input case as \(e_{x_{i}, w_{i}}=s_{j}\left(A_{i j}+e_{Q, P}\right),\) where \(A_{i j}\) is the Allen elasticity of substitution defined in Problem 10.12 . For reasons described in Problems 10.11 and 10.12 , this approach to input demand in the multi-input case is generally inferior to using Morishima elasticities. One oddity might be mentioned, however. For the case \(i=j\) this expression seems to say that \(e_{L, w}=s_{L}\left(A_{L L}+e_{Q . P}\right),\) and if we jumped to the conclusion that \(A_{L L}=\sigma\) in the two-input case, then this would contradict the result from Problem \(11.12 .\) You can resolve this paradox by using the definitions from Problem 10.12 to show that, with two inputs, \(A_{L L}=\left(-s_{K} / s_{L}\right) \cdot A_{K L}=\left(-s_{K} / s_{L}\right) \cdot \sigma\) and so there is no disagreement.

Universal Widget produces high-quality widgets at its plant in Gulch, Nevada, for sale throughout the world. The cost function for total widget production ( \(q\) ) is given by total cost \(=0.25 q^{2}\) Widgets are demanded only in Australia (where the demand curve is given by \(q_{A}=100-2 P_{A}\) ) and Lapland (where the demand curve is given by \(q_{L}=100-4 P_{L}\) ); thus, total demand equals \(q=q_{A}+q_{L}\). If Universal Widget can control the quantities supplied to each market, how many should it sell in each location to maximize total profits? What price will be charged in each location?

The demand for any input depends ultimately on the demand for the goods that input produces. This can be shown most explicitly by deriving an entire industry's demand for inputs. To do so, we assume that an industry produces a homogencous good, \(Q,\) under constant returns to scale using only capital and labor. The demand function for \(Q\) is given by \(Q=D(P)\), where \(P\) is the market price of the good being produced. Because of the constant returns-to- scale assumption, \(P=M C=A C\). Throughout this problem let \(C(v, w, 1)\) be the firm's unit cost function. a. Explain why the total industry demands for capital and labor are given by \(K=Q C_{v}\) and \(L=Q C_{w}\) b. Show that \\[ \frac{\partial K}{\partial v}=Q C_{v v}+D^{\prime} C_{v}^{2} \quad \text { and } \quad \frac{\partial L}{\partial w}=Q C_{w w}+D^{\prime} C_{w}^{2} \\] c. Prove that \\[ C_{w v}=\frac{-w}{v} C_{v w} \quad \text { and } \quad C_{w w}=\frac{-v}{w} C_{N w} \\] d. Use the results from parts (b) and (c) together with the elasticity of substitution defined as \(\sigma=C C_{v n} / C_{\nu} C_{w}\) to show that \\[ \frac{\partial K}{\partial v}=\frac{w L}{Q} \cdot \frac{\sigma K}{v C}+\frac{D^{\prime} K^{2}}{Q^{2}} \text { and } \frac{\partial L}{\partial w}=\frac{v K}{Q} \cdot \frac{\sigma L}{w C}+\frac{D^{\prime} L^{2}}{Q^{2}} \\] e. Convert the derivatives in part (d) into elasticities to show that \\[ e_{K, v}=-s_{L} \sigma+s_{K} e_{Q, p} \quad \text { and } \quad e_{L, w}=-s_{K} \sigma+s_{L} e_{Q, P} \\] where \(e_{Q, P}\) is the price elasticity of demand for the product being produced. f. Discuss the importance of the results in part (e) using the notions of substitution and output effects from Chapter 11 Note: The notion that the elasticity of the derived demand for an input depends on the price elasticity of demand for the output being produced was first suggested by Alfred Marshall. The proof given here follows that in D. Hamermesh, Labor Demand (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).

This problem has you work through some of the calculations associated with the numerical example in the Extensions. Refer to the Extensions for a discussion of the theory in the case of Fisher Body and General Motors (GM), who we imagine are deciding between remaining as separate firms or having GM acquire Fisher Body and thus become one (larger) firm. Let the total surplus that the units generate together be \(S\left(x_{F}, x_{G}\right)=x_{F}^{1 / 2}+a x_{G}^{1 / 2},\) where \(x_{F}\) and \(x_{G}\) are the investments undertaken by the managers of the two units before negotiating, and where a unit of investment costs \(\$ 1 .\) The parameter \(a\) measures the importance of GM's manager's investment. Show that, according to the property rights model worked out in the Extensions, it is efficient for GM to acquire Fisher Body if and only if GM's manager's investment is important enough, in particular, if \(a>\sqrt{3}\)

The production function for a firm in the business of calculator assembly is given by \\[ q=2 \sqrt{l} \\] where \(q\) denotes finished calculator output and \(l\) denotes hours of labor input. The firm is a price-taker both for calculators (which sell for \(P\) ) and for workers (which can be hired at a wage rate of \(w\) per hour). a. What is the total cost function for this firm? b. What is the profit function for this firm? c. What is the supply function for assembled calculators \([q(P, w)] ?\) d. What is this firm's demand for labor function \([l(P, w)] ?\) e. Describe intuitively why these functions have the form they do.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free