Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The market for high-quality caviar is dependent on the weather. If the weather is good, there are many fancy parties and caviar sells for \(\$ 30\) per pound. In bad weather it sells for only \(\$ 20\) per pound. Caviar produced one weck will not keep until the next week. A small caviar producer has a cost function given by $$C=0.5 q^{2}+5 q+100$$ where \(q\) is weekly caviar production. Production decisions must be made before the weather (and the price of caviar) is known, but it is known that good weather and bad weather each occur with a probability of 0.5 a. How much caviar should this firm produce if it wishes to maximize the expected value of its profits? b. Suppose the owner of this firm has a utility function of the form \\[ \text { utility }=\sqrt{\pi} \\] where \(\pi\) is weekly profits. What is the expected utility associated with the output strategy defined in part (a)? c. Can this firm owner obtain a higher utility of profits by producing some output other than that specified in parts (a) and (b)? Explain. d. Suppose this firm could predict next week's price but could not influence that price. What strategy would maximize expected profits in this case? What would expected profits be?

Short Answer

Expert verified
**Answer:** 1. Calculate revenue and profit functions for good and bad weather scenarios. 2. Calculate the expected profit function considering the probabilities of good and bad weather. 3. Maximize the expected profit function by taking its first derivative and setting it to zero. 4. Calculate the expected utility using the optimal production level and given utility function. 5. Investigate alternative production strategies using the second derivative test. 6. Consider a scenario where the firm can predict next week's price but not influence it and calculate the expected profits for each weather scenario.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Revenue and Profit Functions

First, we need to calculate the revenue and profit functions for both good and bad weather scenarios. In good weather, the price per pound of caviar is \(30, and in bad weather, it's \)20. The revenue and profit functions are as follows: Good weather revenue: \(R_G(q) = 30q\) Bad weather revenue: \(R_B(q) = 20q\) To find the profit function (\(\pi\)) for both scenarios, subtract the cost function (\(C(q)\)) from the respective revenue functions: Good weather profit: \(\pi_G(q) = R_G(q) - C(q) = 30q - (0.5 q^{2} + 5q + 100)\) Bad weather profit: \(\pi_B(q) = R_B(q) - C(q) = 20q - (0.5 q^{2} + 5q + 100)\)
02

Calculate the Expected Profit Function

Since each weather scenario has an equal probability of occurring (0.5), the expected profit function can be calculated as the weighted average of the good and bad weather profit functions: Expected Profit: \(\pi_E(q) = 0.5 \pi_G(q) + 0.5 \pi_B(q)\)
03

Maximize Expected Profit

To find the optimal production level that maximizes expected profit, we need to take the first derivative of the expected profit function \(\pi_E(q)\) with respect to \(q\) and set it equal to zero. Solve for \(q\): \(\frac{d \pi_E(q)}{d q} = 0\)
04

Calculate the Expected Utility

Using the optimal production level from Step 3 (denoted as \(q^*\)), calculate the expected utility for the owner with the utility function provided: \(\text { utility }=\sqrt{\pi}\) Expected Utility: \(U_E = 0.5\sqrt{\pi_G(q^*)} + 0.5\sqrt{\pi_B(q^*)}\)
05

Investigating Alternative Production Strategies

To answer whether a different production strategy could lead to a higher utility in this case, we need to show that any alternative production level would yield a lower expected utility, or at least, no higher expected utility. The second derivative test can help establish this condition.
06

Predicting Next Week's Price

Assuming the firm can predict next week's price but not influence it, we need to find the production strategy that maximizes expected profits in this case. We'll consider both good and bad weather scenarios and calculate the profits for each, and then calculate the expected profits.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Expected Value of Profits
When firms face uncertainties in market conditions, such as fluctuating prices due to weather, they often aim to maximize the expected value of their profits. The expected value of profits is a statistical concept that calculates the average of all possible profits, weighted by the likelihood of each scenario occurring.

In function terms, the expected profit \(\pi_E(q)\) for our caviar producer is obtained by calculating the weighted average of profits for both good (\(\pi_G(q)\)) and bad (\(\pi_B(q)\)) weather, considering that both weather conditions have equal chances of occurring, which is expressed mathematically as:
\[\pi_E(q) = 0.5 \pi_G(q) + 0.5 \pi_B(q)\].

The producer must decide on the quantity (\(q\)) prior to knowing whether conditions will be favorable, aiming to choose the production level that will, on average, provide the highest profit. To determine this, the firm calculates the derivative of the expected profit function with respect to quantity and sets it equal to zero to find the production level that maximizes expected profit. This concept is crucial because it guides the firm in making the most informed decision under uncertainty, thereby enhancing its profitability over the long term.
Utility Function
A utility function represents the satisfaction or preference an individual or firm gains from consuming goods or services, or in this case, achieving a certain level of profits. For the caviar producer, the given utility function is expressed as a function of weekly profits: \(\sqrt{\pi}\).

The square root utility function signifies a risk-averse behavior, as each additional unit of profit yields a progressively smaller increase in utility. The expected utility of a certain production strategy is evaluated by taking the average of the utility obtained from profits under different scenarios, weighted by the probability of each scenario. In our producer's case, we used the following formula:
\[U_E = 0.5\sqrt{\pi_G(q^*)} + 0.5\sqrt{\pi_B(q^*)}\]

Where \(q^*\) is the production level that maximizes expected profit, obtained from the previous step of maximizing the expected value of profits. The utility function plays a pivotal role in decision-making under uncertainty, especially when the owner's risk preferences are taken into account.
Profit Maximization
Profit maximization is the process by which a firm determines the price and output level that returns the highest profit. Under conditions of certainty, firms produce where marginal costs equal marginal revenues. However, in uncertain environments, like our caviar market affected by weather variations, firms need to take into account the probabilities of different scenarios.

In the scenario where the firm can predict the upcoming price, it can directly calculate the profit-maximizing output level for that price, considering its cost function. This contrasts with the earlier scenario where the firm needs to consider both possible prices and their probabilities. Both methods focus on finding the point at which the production level leads to the optimal outcome under the given circumstances, whether they include uncertainty or not.

In this case, whether the owner should use the strategy from part (a) depends on their utility function and attitude towards risk. If the utility from expected profits under the strategy from part (a) does not exceed that of all other possible strategies, then the owner might consider alternative production levels. Indeed, these alternative strategies should be evaluated using the utility function to ensure decisions are made that align with the owner's risk preferences and maximize their satisfaction from profits.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How would you expect an increase in output price, \(P\), to affect the demand for capital and labor inputs? a. Explain graphically why, if neither input is inferior, it seems clear that a rise in \(P\) must not reduce the demand for either factor. b. Show that the graphical presumption from part (a) is demonstrated by the input demand functions that can be derived in the Cobb-Douglas case. c. Use the profit function to show how the presence of inferior inputs would lead to ambiguity in the effect of \(P\) on input demand.

With a CES production function of the form \(q=\left(k^{\rho}+l^{\rho}\right)^{\gamma / \rho}\) a whole lot of algebra is needed to compute the profit function as \(\Pi(P, v, w)=K P^{1 /(1-\gamma)}\left(v^{1-\alpha}+w^{1-\sigma}\right)^{\gamma /(1-\sigma)(\gamma-1)},\) where \(\sigma=1 /(1-\rho)\) and \(K\) is a constant a. If you are a glutton for punishment (or if your instructor is), prove that the profit function takes this form. Perhaps the easiest way to do so is to start from the CES cost function in Example 10.2 b. Explain why this profit function provides a reasonable representation of a firm's behavior only for \(0<\gamma<1\) c. Explain the role of the elasticity of substitution ( \(\sigma\) ) in this profit function. What is the supply function in this case? How does \(\sigma\) determine the extent to which that function shifts when input prices change? e. Derive the input demand functions in this case. How are these functions affected by the size of \(\sigma ?\)

This problem has you work through some of the calculations associated with the numerical example in the Extensions. Refer to the Extensions for a discussion of the theory in the case of Fisher Body and General Motors (GM), who we imagine are deciding between remaining as separate firms or having GM acquire Fisher Body and thus become one (larger) firm. Let the total surplus that the units generate together be \(S\left(x_{F}, x_{G}\right)=x_{F}^{1 / 2}+a x_{G}^{1 / 2},\) where \(x_{F}\) and \(x_{G}\) are the investments undertaken by the managers of the two units before negotiating, and where a unit of investment costs \(\$ 1 .\) The parameter \(a\) measures the importance of GM's manager's investment. Show that, according to the property rights model worked out in the Extensions, it is efficient for GM to acquire Fisher Body if and only if GM's manager's investment is important enough, in particular, if \(a>\sqrt{3}\)

With two inputs, cross-price effects on input demand can be easily calculated using the procedure outlined in Problem 11.12 a. Use steps (b), (d), and (e) from Problem 11.12 to show that \\[ e_{K, w}=s_{L}\left(\sigma+e_{Q, P}\right) \quad \text { and } \quad e_{L, v}=s_{K}\left(\sigma+e_{Q, P}\right) \\] b. Describe intuitively why input shares appear somewhat differently in the demand elasticities in part (e) of Problem 11.12 than they do in part (a) of this problem. c. The expression computed in part (a) can be easily generalized to the many- input case as \(e_{x_{i}, w_{i}}=s_{j}\left(A_{i j}+e_{Q, P}\right),\) where \(A_{i j}\) is the Allen elasticity of substitution defined in Problem 10.12 . For reasons described in Problems 10.11 and 10.12 , this approach to input demand in the multi-input case is generally inferior to using Morishima elasticities. One oddity might be mentioned, however. For the case \(i=j\) this expression seems to say that \(e_{L, w}=s_{L}\left(A_{L L}+e_{Q . P}\right),\) and if we jumped to the conclusion that \(A_{L L}=\sigma\) in the two-input case, then this would contradict the result from Problem \(11.12 .\) You can resolve this paradox by using the definitions from Problem 10.12 to show that, with two inputs, \(A_{L L}=\left(-s_{K} / s_{L}\right) \cdot A_{K L}=\left(-s_{K} / s_{L}\right) \cdot \sigma\) and so there is no disagreement.

Young's theorem can be used in combination with the envelope results in this chapter to derive some useful results. a. Show that \(\partial l(P, v, w) / \partial v=\partial k(P, v, w) / \partial w\). Interpret this result using substitution and output effects. b. Use the result from part (a) to show how a unit tax on labor would be expected to affect capital input. c. Show that \(\partial q / \partial w=-\partial l / \partial P\). Interpret this result. d. Use the result from part (c) to discuss how a unit tax on labor input would affect quantity supplied.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free