Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that a firm's production function exhibits technical improvements over time and that the form of the function is \(q=f(k, l, t) .\) In this case, we can measure the proportional rate of technical change as \\[ \frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t}=\frac{f_{t}}{f} \\] (compare this with the treatment in Chapter 9 ). Show that this rate of change can also be measured using the profit function as \\[ \frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t}=\frac{\Pi(P, v, w, t)}{P q} \cdot \frac{\partial \ln \Pi}{\partial t} \\] That is, rather than using the production function directly, technical change can be measured by knowing the share of profits in total revenue and the proportionate change in profits over time (holding all prices constant). This approach to measuring technical change may be preferable when data on actual input levels do not exist.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Prove that the proportional rate of technical change can be measured using the profit function given as \(\frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t}=\frac{\Pi(P, v, w, t)}{P q} \cdot \frac{\partial \ln \Pi}{\partial t}\). Solution: We followed the steps of differentiating the profit function, calculating the proportionate change in profits over time, and finding the connection between the proportional rate of technical change and the profit function. We derived both sides of the given equation and found that they are equal, thus proving the desired result.

Step by step solution

01

The production function with technical improvements over time is given by: \(q = f(k, l, t)\), where \(q\) is the output, \(k\) is the capital input, \(l\) is the labor input, and \(t\) represents the technical progress parameter. The profit function \(\Pi(P, v, w, t)\) is given by: \(\Pi = P q - v k - w l\), where \(P\) is the output price, \(v\) is the price of capital and \(w\) is the price of labor. #Step 2: Define the proportional rate of technical change#

From the question, we know that the proportional rate of technical change can be given as: \(\frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t} = \frac{f_{t}}{f}\), where \(f_{t}\) represents the partial derivative of \(f\) with respect to \(t\). We need to show that the proportional rate of technical change can also be calculated using the profit function as: \(\frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t}=\frac{\Pi(P, v, w, t)}{P q} \cdot \frac{\partial \ln \Pi}{\partial t}\). #Step 3: Differentiate the profit function with respect to \(t\)#
02

We will differentiate the profit function \(\Pi = P q - v k - w l\) with respect to \(t\). We can write \(\Pi = P f(k, l, t) - v k - w l\). Now taking the derivative with respect to \(t\): \(\frac{\partial \Pi}{\partial t} = P \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} - v \frac{\partial k}{\partial t} - w \frac{\partial l}{\partial t}\). Since we are holding all prices constant, we have \(\frac{\partial k}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial l}{\partial t} = 0\). So, \(\frac{\partial \Pi}{\partial t} = P \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}\). #Step 4: Differentiate the profit function with respect to \(f\) to find the shares of profits in total revenue#

Now, we differentiate \(\Pi\) with respect to \(f\), treating \(f\) as a variable and holding all other variables constant: \(\frac{\partial \Pi}{\partial f} = P \cdot \frac{\partial q}{\partial f} = P\). So, the share of profits in total revenue is given by \(\frac{\Pi}{P q}\). #Step 5: Calculate the proportionate change in profits over time#
03

To find the proportionate change in profits over time, differentiate the natural logarithm of \(\Pi\) with respect to \(t\): \(\frac{\partial \ln \Pi}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{\Pi}\cdot\frac{\partial \Pi}{\partial t} = \frac{P \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}}{\Pi}\). #Step 6: Show the connection between the proportional rate of technical change and the profit function#

Substitute the share of profits in total revenue and the proportionate change in profits over time in the given equation: \(\frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t}=\frac{\Pi(P, v, w, t)}{P q} \cdot \frac{\partial \ln \Pi}{\partial t} = \frac{\Pi}{P q} \cdot \frac{P \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}}{\Pi}\). Observe that \(\Pi\) cancels in the numerator and denominator, and we get: \(\frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t} = \frac{\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}}{f}\). Since we know that \(\frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t} = \frac{f_{t}}{f}\), we can see that both sides of the given equation are equal, thus proving the desired result.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Would a lump-sum profits tax affect the profit-maximizing quantity of output? How about a proportional tax on profits? How about a tax assessed on each unit of output? How about a tax on labor input?

Universal Widget produces high-quality widgets at its plant in Gulch, Nevada, for sale throughout the world. The cost function for total widget production ( \(q\) ) is given by total cost \(=0.25 q^{2}\) Widgets are demanded only in Australia (where the demand curve is given by \(q_{A}=100-2 P_{A}\) ) and Lapland (where the demand curve is given by \(q_{L}=100-4 P_{L}\) ); thus, total demand equals \(q=q_{A}+q_{L}\). If Universal Widget can control the quantities supplied to each market, how many should it sell in each location to maximize total profits? What price will be charged in each location?

This problem concerns the relationship between demand and marginal revenue curves for a few functional forms. a. Show that, for a linear demand curve, the marginal revenue curve bisects the distance between the vertical axis and the demand curve for any price. b. Show that, for any linear demand curve, the vertical distance between the demand and marginal revenue curves is \(-1 / b \cdot q\) where \(b(<0)\) is the slope of the demand curve. c. Show that, for a constant elasticity demand curve of the form \(q=a P^{b}\), the vertical distance between the demand and marginal revenue curves is a constant ratio of the height of the demand curve, with this constant depending on the price elasticity of demand. d. Show that, for any downward-sloping demand curve, the vertical distance between the demand and marginal revenue curves at any point can be found by using a linear approximation to the demand curve at that point and applying the procedure described in part (b). e. Graph the results of parts (a)-(d) of this problem.

With a CES production function of the form \(q=\left(k^{\rho}+l^{\rho}\right)^{\gamma / \rho}\) a whole lot of algebra is needed to compute the profit function as \(\Pi(P, v, w)=K P^{1 /(1-\gamma)}\left(v^{1-\alpha}+w^{1-\sigma}\right)^{\gamma /(1-\sigma)(\gamma-1)},\) where \(\sigma=1 /(1-\rho)\) and \(K\) is a constant a. If you are a glutton for punishment (or if your instructor is), prove that the profit function takes this form. Perhaps the easiest way to do so is to start from the CES cost function in Example 10.2 b. Explain why this profit function provides a reasonable representation of a firm's behavior only for \(0<\gamma<1\) c. Explain the role of the elasticity of substitution ( \(\sigma\) ) in this profit function. What is the supply function in this case? How does \(\sigma\) determine the extent to which that function shifts when input prices change? e. Derive the input demand functions in this case. How are these functions affected by the size of \(\sigma ?\)

The market for high-quality caviar is dependent on the weather. If the weather is good, there are many fancy parties and caviar sells for \(\$ 30\) per pound. In bad weather it sells for only \(\$ 20\) per pound. Caviar produced one weck will not keep until the next week. A small caviar producer has a cost function given by $$C=0.5 q^{2}+5 q+100$$ where \(q\) is weekly caviar production. Production decisions must be made before the weather (and the price of caviar) is known, but it is known that good weather and bad weather each occur with a probability of 0.5 a. How much caviar should this firm produce if it wishes to maximize the expected value of its profits? b. Suppose the owner of this firm has a utility function of the form \\[ \text { utility }=\sqrt{\pi} \\] where \(\pi\) is weekly profits. What is the expected utility associated with the output strategy defined in part (a)? c. Can this firm owner obtain a higher utility of profits by producing some output other than that specified in parts (a) and (b)? Explain. d. Suppose this firm could predict next week's price but could not influence that price. What strategy would maximize expected profits in this case? What would expected profits be?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free