Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that a firm's production function exhibits technical improvements over time and that the form of the function is \(q=f(k, l, t) .\) In this case, we can measure the proportional rate of technical change as \\[ \frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t}=\frac{f_{t}}{f} \\] (compare this with the treatment in Chapter 9 ). Show that this rate of change can also be measured using the profit function as \\[ \frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t}=\frac{\Pi(P, v, w, t)}{P q} \cdot \frac{\partial \ln \Pi}{\partial t} \\] That is, rather than using the production function directly, technical change can be measured by knowing the share of profits in total revenue and the proportionate change in profits over time (holding all prices constant). This approach to measuring technical change may be preferable when data on actual input levels do not exist.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Prove that the proportional rate of technical change can be measured using the profit function given as \(\frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t}=\frac{\Pi(P, v, w, t)}{P q} \cdot \frac{\partial \ln \Pi}{\partial t}\). Solution: We followed the steps of differentiating the profit function, calculating the proportionate change in profits over time, and finding the connection between the proportional rate of technical change and the profit function. We derived both sides of the given equation and found that they are equal, thus proving the desired result.

Step by step solution

01

The production function with technical improvements over time is given by: \(q = f(k, l, t)\), where \(q\) is the output, \(k\) is the capital input, \(l\) is the labor input, and \(t\) represents the technical progress parameter. The profit function \(\Pi(P, v, w, t)\) is given by: \(\Pi = P q - v k - w l\), where \(P\) is the output price, \(v\) is the price of capital and \(w\) is the price of labor. #Step 2: Define the proportional rate of technical change#

From the question, we know that the proportional rate of technical change can be given as: \(\frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t} = \frac{f_{t}}{f}\), where \(f_{t}\) represents the partial derivative of \(f\) with respect to \(t\). We need to show that the proportional rate of technical change can also be calculated using the profit function as: \(\frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t}=\frac{\Pi(P, v, w, t)}{P q} \cdot \frac{\partial \ln \Pi}{\partial t}\). #Step 3: Differentiate the profit function with respect to \(t\)#
02

We will differentiate the profit function \(\Pi = P q - v k - w l\) with respect to \(t\). We can write \(\Pi = P f(k, l, t) - v k - w l\). Now taking the derivative with respect to \(t\): \(\frac{\partial \Pi}{\partial t} = P \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} - v \frac{\partial k}{\partial t} - w \frac{\partial l}{\partial t}\). Since we are holding all prices constant, we have \(\frac{\partial k}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial l}{\partial t} = 0\). So, \(\frac{\partial \Pi}{\partial t} = P \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}\). #Step 4: Differentiate the profit function with respect to \(f\) to find the shares of profits in total revenue#

Now, we differentiate \(\Pi\) with respect to \(f\), treating \(f\) as a variable and holding all other variables constant: \(\frac{\partial \Pi}{\partial f} = P \cdot \frac{\partial q}{\partial f} = P\). So, the share of profits in total revenue is given by \(\frac{\Pi}{P q}\). #Step 5: Calculate the proportionate change in profits over time#
03

To find the proportionate change in profits over time, differentiate the natural logarithm of \(\Pi\) with respect to \(t\): \(\frac{\partial \ln \Pi}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{\Pi}\cdot\frac{\partial \Pi}{\partial t} = \frac{P \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}}{\Pi}\). #Step 6: Show the connection between the proportional rate of technical change and the profit function#

Substitute the share of profits in total revenue and the proportionate change in profits over time in the given equation: \(\frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t}=\frac{\Pi(P, v, w, t)}{P q} \cdot \frac{\partial \ln \Pi}{\partial t} = \frac{\Pi}{P q} \cdot \frac{P \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}}{\Pi}\). Observe that \(\Pi\) cancels in the numerator and denominator, and we get: \(\frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t} = \frac{\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}}{f}\). Since we know that \(\frac{\partial \ln q}{\partial t} = \frac{f_{t}}{f}\), we can see that both sides of the given equation are equal, thus proving the desired result.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Young's theorem can be used in combination with the envelope results in this chapter to derive some useful results. a. Show that \(\partial l(P, v, w) / \partial v=\partial k(P, v, w) / \partial w\). Interpret this result using substitution and output effects. b. Use the result from part (a) to show how a unit tax on labor would be expected to affect capital input. c. Show that \(\partial q / \partial w=-\partial l / \partial P\). Interpret this result. d. Use the result from part (c) to discuss how a unit tax on labor input would affect quantity supplied.

The demand for any input depends ultimately on the demand for the goods that input produces. This can be shown most explicitly by deriving an entire industry's demand for inputs. To do so, we assume that an industry produces a homogencous good, \(Q,\) under constant returns to scale using only capital and labor. The demand function for \(Q\) is given by \(Q=D(P)\), where \(P\) is the market price of the good being produced. Because of the constant returns-to- scale assumption, \(P=M C=A C\). Throughout this problem let \(C(v, w, 1)\) be the firm's unit cost function. a. Explain why the total industry demands for capital and labor are given by \(K=Q C_{v}\) and \(L=Q C_{w}\) b. Show that \\[ \frac{\partial K}{\partial v}=Q C_{v v}+D^{\prime} C_{v}^{2} \quad \text { and } \quad \frac{\partial L}{\partial w}=Q C_{w w}+D^{\prime} C_{w}^{2} \\] c. Prove that \\[ C_{w v}=\frac{-w}{v} C_{v w} \quad \text { and } \quad C_{w w}=\frac{-v}{w} C_{N w} \\] d. Use the results from parts (b) and (c) together with the elasticity of substitution defined as \(\sigma=C C_{v n} / C_{\nu} C_{w}\) to show that \\[ \frac{\partial K}{\partial v}=\frac{w L}{Q} \cdot \frac{\sigma K}{v C}+\frac{D^{\prime} K^{2}}{Q^{2}} \text { and } \frac{\partial L}{\partial w}=\frac{v K}{Q} \cdot \frac{\sigma L}{w C}+\frac{D^{\prime} L^{2}}{Q^{2}} \\] e. Convert the derivatives in part (d) into elasticities to show that \\[ e_{K, v}=-s_{L} \sigma+s_{K} e_{Q, p} \quad \text { and } \quad e_{L, w}=-s_{K} \sigma+s_{L} e_{Q, P} \\] where \(e_{Q, P}\) is the price elasticity of demand for the product being produced. f. Discuss the importance of the results in part (e) using the notions of substitution and output effects from Chapter 11 Note: The notion that the elasticity of the derived demand for an input depends on the price elasticity of demand for the output being produced was first suggested by Alfred Marshall. The proof given here follows that in D. Hamermesh, Labor Demand (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).

This problem has you work through some of the calculations associated with the numerical example in the Extensions. Refer to the Extensions for a discussion of the theory in the case of Fisher Body and General Motors (GM), who we imagine are deciding between remaining as separate firms or having GM acquire Fisher Body and thus become one (larger) firm. Let the total surplus that the units generate together be \(S\left(x_{F}, x_{G}\right)=x_{F}^{1 / 2}+a x_{G}^{1 / 2},\) where \(x_{F}\) and \(x_{G}\) are the investments undertaken by the managers of the two units before negotiating, and where a unit of investment costs \(\$ 1 .\) The parameter \(a\) measures the importance of GM's manager's investment. Show that, according to the property rights model worked out in the Extensions, it is efficient for GM to acquire Fisher Body if and only if GM's manager's investment is important enough, in particular, if \(a>\sqrt{3}\)

This problem concerns the relationship between demand and marginal revenue curves for a few functional forms. a. Show that, for a linear demand curve, the marginal revenue curve bisects the distance between the vertical axis and the demand curve for any price. b. Show that, for any linear demand curve, the vertical distance between the demand and marginal revenue curves is \(-1 / b \cdot q\) where \(b(<0)\) is the slope of the demand curve. c. Show that, for a constant elasticity demand curve of the form \(q=a P^{b}\), the vertical distance between the demand and marginal revenue curves is a constant ratio of the height of the demand curve, with this constant depending on the price elasticity of demand. d. Show that, for any downward-sloping demand curve, the vertical distance between the demand and marginal revenue curves at any point can be found by using a linear approximation to the demand curve at that point and applying the procedure described in part (b). e. Graph the results of parts (a)-(d) of this problem.

How would you expect an increase in output price, \(P\), to affect the demand for capital and labor inputs? a. Explain graphically why, if neither input is inferior, it seems clear that a rise in \(P\) must not reduce the demand for either factor. b. Show that the graphical presumption from part (a) is demonstrated by the input demand functions that can be derived in the Cobb-Douglas case. c. Use the profit function to show how the presence of inferior inputs would lead to ambiguity in the effect of \(P\) on input demand.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free