Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Young's theorem can be used in combination with the envelope results in this chapter to derive some useful results. a. Show that \(\partial l(P, v, w) / \partial v=\partial k(P, v, w) / \partial w\). Interpret this result using substitution and output effects. b. Use the result from part (a) to show how a unit tax on labor would be expected to affect capital input. c. Show that \(\partial q / \partial w=-\partial l / \partial P\). Interpret this result. d. Use the result from part (c) to discuss how a unit tax on labor input would affect quantity supplied.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In conclusion, by applying Young's theorem and the envelope theorem, we derived results that demonstrate the relationships between changes in wage rates, rental rates of capital, labor inputs, capital inputs, and quantity supplied. We showed that the rate of change in labor and capital inputs with respect to wage and rental rate are equal, emphasizing the substitution effect between labor and capital. We also showed the inverse relationship between the production factors and their respective prices. Lastly, we analyzed the impact of a unit tax on labor input, which led to an increase in capital input and a decrease in quantity supplied as firms adjusted their production inputs in response to the increased cost of labor.

Step by step solution

01

Part a: Proving the partial derivative result

We are asked to show that: $$\frac{\partial l(P, v, w)}{\partial v} = \frac{\partial k(P, v, w)}{\partial w}$$ Step 1: Apply Young's theorem. Young's theorem states that if a function has continuous second partial derivatives, then the order of partial differentiation does not matter. Mathematically, it means that: $$\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x\partial y} = \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial y\partial x}$$ Step 2: Apply Young's theorem to our given functions. Applying Young's theorem to our problem, we have: $$\frac{\partial^2 l}{\partial P\partial v} = \frac{\partial^2 l}{\partial v\partial P}$$ and $$\frac{\partial^2 k}{\partial P\partial w} = \frac{\partial^2 k}{\partial w\partial P}$$ Step 3: Utilize the envelope theorem. The envelope theorem states that if we have an optimal solution for a problem, the rate at which the solution changes with respect to the parameters is given by the partial derivatives of the objective function with respect to those parameters. In other words, \(\frac{\partial^2 k}{\partial w\partial P}=0\) and \(\frac{\partial^2 l}{\partial v\partial P}=0.\) Step 4: Combine the results in Step 2 and Step 3. Combining the results from the previous steps, we have: $$\frac{\partial^2 l}{\partial P\partial v} = 0$$ and $$\frac{\partial^2 k}{\partial P\partial w} = 0$$ Step 5: Show the required result. From Step 4, we have: $$\frac{\partial}{\partial P}\left(\frac{\partial l}{\partial v}\right) = 0$$ which implies that: $$\frac{\partial l(P, v, w)}{\partial v}$$ is constant with respect to \(P\). Similarly, $$\frac{\partial}{\partial P}\left(\frac{\partial k}{\partial w}\right) = 0$$ which implies that: $$\frac{\partial k(P, v, w)}{\partial w}$$ is constant with respect to \(P\). Since both of the partial derivatives are constant with respect to \(P\), they must be equal: $$\frac{\partial l(P, v, w)}{\partial v} = \frac{\partial k(P, v, w)}{\partial w}$$ Interpretation: This result suggests that the rate at which labor input (\(l\)) changes with respect to the wage (\(v\)) is equal to the rate at which capital input (\(k\)) changes with respect to the rental rate of capital (\(w\)). In other words, if the wage rate increases, labor input will change at the same rate as capital input changes with respect to the rental rate of capital. This can be thought of as the substitution effect, where labor and capital are substitutes in the production process, and an increase in the wage rate would cause the firm to substitute away from labor and toward capital.
02

Part b: Impact of a unit tax on labor input on capital input

Using the result from part (a), we can analyze how a unit tax on labor input would affect capital input. Suppose there is a unit tax, \(t\), on labor input. Now the wage rate is \(v + t\). $$\frac{\partial l(P, v+t, w)}{\partial v} = \frac{\partial k(P, v+t, w)}{\partial w}$$ Thus, the change in capital input with respect to the change in wage (due to the tax) is equal to the change in labor input with respect to the change in wage: $$\Delta k = \frac{\partial k}{\partial w}\Delta(v+t)$$ Since the substitution effect leads to a decrease in labor input when the wage rate increases, the capital input will increase as a response to the labor substitution.
03

Part c: Proving and interpreting the partial derivative result

We are asked to show that: $$\frac{\partial q}{\partial w} = -\frac{\partial l}{\partial P}$$ Step 1: Apply Young's theorem. As we saw in part a, applying Young's theorem to our problem, we have: $$\frac{\partial^2 l}{\partial P\partial w} = \frac{\partial^2 l}{\partial w\partial P}$$ and $$\frac{\partial^2 q}{\partial P\partial w} = \frac{\partial^2 q}{\partial w\partial P}$$ Step 2: Utilize the envelope theorem. Following the same logic as in part a, we know that \(\frac{\partial^2 l}{\partial w\partial P}=0\) and \(\frac{\partial^2 q}{\partial w\partial P}=0.\) Step 3: Combine the results in Step 1 and Step 2. From Step 2, we have: $$\frac{\partial}{\partial P}\left(\frac{\partial l}{\partial w}\right) = 0$$ which implies that: $$\frac{\partial l(P, v, w)}{\partial w}$$ is constant with respect to \(P\). Similarly, $$\frac{\partial}{\partial P}\left(\frac{\partial q}{\partial w}\right) = 0$$ which implies that: $$\frac{\partial q(P, v, w)}{\partial w}$$ is constant with respect to \(P\). Step 4: Show the required result. Since \(\frac{\partial l}{\partial w}\) is constant with respect to \(P\), we can express it as: $$\frac{\partial l}{\partial w} = -k$$ for some constant \(k\). Also, since \(\frac{\partial q}{\partial w}\) is constant with respect to \(P\), we can express it as: $$\frac{\partial q}{\partial w} = k$$ Now, combining the expressions for the partial derivatives, we obtain the desired result: $$\frac{\partial q}{\partial w} = -\frac{\partial l}{\partial P}$$ Interpretation: This result suggests that the rate at which the quantity produced (\(q\)) changes with respect to the rental rate of capital (\(w\)) is equal to the negative rate at which labor input (\(l\)) changes with respect to the price of the produced good (\(P\)). It means that if the rental rate of capital were to increase, the quantity produced would decrease, and if the price of the produced good increases, labor input decreases. This highlights the inverse relationships between the production factors and their respective prices.
04

Part d: Impact of a unit tax on labor input on quantity supplied

Given the result from part (c), we can analyze how a unit tax on labor input would affect the quantity supplied. Suppose there is a unit tax, \(t\), on labor input. Now the wage rate is \(v + t\). $$\frac{\partial q(P, v+t, w)}{\partial w} = -\frac{\partial l(P, v+t, w)}{\partial P}$$ $$\Delta q = -\frac{\partial l}{\partial P}\Delta(v+t)$$ Since an increase in wage induced by the tax would decrease labor input, the change in labor input with respect to the change in wage (due to the tax) would cause a decrease in the quantity supplied. Firms would reduce their production in response to the increased cost of labor input.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Economic Theory
Economic theory provides systematic frameworks to understand how resources are allocated, prices are determined, and how individuals, firms, and governments make decisions. In the context of production, it examines the relationship between input factors—like labor and capital—and output, which is the quantity of goods produced.

One of the fundamental principles in economic theory is the concept of a production function, a mathematical equation that describes the output generated given certain amounts of inputs. When firms strive to maximize profit, they need to determine the optimal combination of inputs. Economic theory also looks into the effects of policies, such as taxes, on input use and production levels.

Understanding how a firm reacts to changes, like an increase in wages or a tax, involves analyzing how these changes impact the quantities of inputs used and the quantity of output produced. This relationship is crucial for predicting economic behavior and for policy formulation, an area where the application of differential calculus and tools like Young's theorem and the envelope theorem becomes essential.
Envelope Theorem
The envelope theorem is a critical concept in economics, particularly in the optimization of functions. It describes how the value of an optimized objective function changes when a parameter that affects the constraints of the optimization problem is varied.

Simply put, if a firm is profit-maximizing, and one of its costs changes, the envelope theorem helps to understand the impact of this change on the firm's profits without re-solving the entire optimization problem. This theorem hinges on the idea that at the optimum, certain partial derivatives of the lagrangian (which includes both the objective function and the constraints) will be zero.

For example, if we apply the envelope theorem to a production scenario where a firm faces a unit tax on labor, it indicates that the impact of this tax on the firm's optimal choice of labor and capital inputs can be directly determined by examining specific partial derivatives. This insight is exceptionally useful in economic analysis as it simplifies the process of gauging the immediate effects of policy changes on production decisions.
Partial Derivatives
Partial derivatives play a fundamental role in several fields, including economics. They measure how a function changes as one of its variables changes, holding all other variables constant. In the context of the exercise where labor and capital inputs are considered, partial derivatives are used to assess how alterations in the wage or rental rate of capital will affect labor or capital inputs.

Partial derivatives are denoted, for instance, by \( \frac{\partial l(P, v, w)}{\partial v} \) which represents the rate of change of labor input with respect to changes in wage. When we say that \( \frac{\partial l(P, v, w)}{\partial v} = \frac{\partial k(P, v, w)}{\partial w} \), it implies that the reaction of labor input to a change in wage is identical to the reaction of capital input to a change in the rental rate of capital, an essential relationship in understanding substitution effects in production.

Grasping the concept of partial derivatives is crucial to analyze various economic scenarios as it allows students and economists to predict the effects of changes in market conditions or policies on different economic variables.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The market for high-quality caviar is dependent on the weather. If the weather is good, there are many fancy parties and caviar sells for \(\$ 30\) per pound. In bad weather it sells for only \(\$ 20\) per pound. Caviar produced one weck will not keep until the next week. A small caviar producer has a cost function given by $$C=0.5 q^{2}+5 q+100$$ where \(q\) is weekly caviar production. Production decisions must be made before the weather (and the price of caviar) is known, but it is known that good weather and bad weather each occur with a probability of 0.5 a. How much caviar should this firm produce if it wishes to maximize the expected value of its profits? b. Suppose the owner of this firm has a utility function of the form \\[ \text { utility }=\sqrt{\pi} \\] where \(\pi\) is weekly profits. What is the expected utility associated with the output strategy defined in part (a)? c. Can this firm owner obtain a higher utility of profits by producing some output other than that specified in parts (a) and (b)? Explain. d. Suppose this firm could predict next week's price but could not influence that price. What strategy would maximize expected profits in this case? What would expected profits be?

The demand for any input depends ultimately on the demand for the goods that input produces. This can be shown most explicitly by deriving an entire industry's demand for inputs. To do so, we assume that an industry produces a homogencous good, \(Q,\) under constant returns to scale using only capital and labor. The demand function for \(Q\) is given by \(Q=D(P)\), where \(P\) is the market price of the good being produced. Because of the constant returns-to- scale assumption, \(P=M C=A C\). Throughout this problem let \(C(v, w, 1)\) be the firm's unit cost function. a. Explain why the total industry demands for capital and labor are given by \(K=Q C_{v}\) and \(L=Q C_{w}\) b. Show that \\[ \frac{\partial K}{\partial v}=Q C_{v v}+D^{\prime} C_{v}^{2} \quad \text { and } \quad \frac{\partial L}{\partial w}=Q C_{w w}+D^{\prime} C_{w}^{2} \\] c. Prove that \\[ C_{w v}=\frac{-w}{v} C_{v w} \quad \text { and } \quad C_{w w}=\frac{-v}{w} C_{N w} \\] d. Use the results from parts (b) and (c) together with the elasticity of substitution defined as \(\sigma=C C_{v n} / C_{\nu} C_{w}\) to show that \\[ \frac{\partial K}{\partial v}=\frac{w L}{Q} \cdot \frac{\sigma K}{v C}+\frac{D^{\prime} K^{2}}{Q^{2}} \text { and } \frac{\partial L}{\partial w}=\frac{v K}{Q} \cdot \frac{\sigma L}{w C}+\frac{D^{\prime} L^{2}}{Q^{2}} \\] e. Convert the derivatives in part (d) into elasticities to show that \\[ e_{K, v}=-s_{L} \sigma+s_{K} e_{Q, p} \quad \text { and } \quad e_{L, w}=-s_{K} \sigma+s_{L} e_{Q, P} \\] where \(e_{Q, P}\) is the price elasticity of demand for the product being produced. f. Discuss the importance of the results in part (e) using the notions of substitution and output effects from Chapter 11 Note: The notion that the elasticity of the derived demand for an input depends on the price elasticity of demand for the output being produced was first suggested by Alfred Marshall. The proof given here follows that in D. Hamermesh, Labor Demand (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).

Would a lump-sum profits tax affect the profit-maximizing quantity of output? How about a proportional tax on profits? How about a tax assessed on each unit of output? How about a tax on labor input?

With a CES production function of the form \(q=\left(k^{\rho}+l^{\rho}\right)^{\gamma / \rho}\) a whole lot of algebra is needed to compute the profit function as \(\Pi(P, v, w)=K P^{1 /(1-\gamma)}\left(v^{1-\alpha}+w^{1-\sigma}\right)^{\gamma /(1-\sigma)(\gamma-1)},\) where \(\sigma=1 /(1-\rho)\) and \(K\) is a constant a. If you are a glutton for punishment (or if your instructor is), prove that the profit function takes this form. Perhaps the easiest way to do so is to start from the CES cost function in Example 10.2 b. Explain why this profit function provides a reasonable representation of a firm's behavior only for \(0<\gamma<1\) c. Explain the role of the elasticity of substitution ( \(\sigma\) ) in this profit function. What is the supply function in this case? How does \(\sigma\) determine the extent to which that function shifts when input prices change? e. Derive the input demand functions in this case. How are these functions affected by the size of \(\sigma ?\)

Universal Widget produces high-quality widgets at its plant in Gulch, Nevada, for sale throughout the world. The cost function for total widget production ( \(q\) ) is given by total cost \(=0.25 q^{2}\) Widgets are demanded only in Australia (where the demand curve is given by \(q_{A}=100-2 P_{A}\) ) and Lapland (where the demand curve is given by \(q_{L}=100-4 P_{L}\) ); thus, total demand equals \(q=q_{A}+q_{L}\). If Universal Widget can control the quantities supplied to each market, how many should it sell in each location to maximize total profits? What price will be charged in each location?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free