Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The country of Podunk produces only wheat and cloth, using as inputs land and labor. Both are produced by constant returns-to-scale production functions. Wheat is the relatively land-intensive commodity. a. Explain, in words or with diagrams, how the price of wheat relative to cloth ( \(p\) ) determines the land-labor ratio in cach of the two industries. b. Suppose that \(p\) is given by external forces (this would be the case if Podunk were a "small" country trading freely with a "large" world). Show, using the Edgeworth box, that if the supply of labor increases in Podunk then the output of cloth will rise and the output of wheat will fall. Note: This result was discovered by the Polish economist Tadeusz Rybczynski. It is a fundamental result in the theory of international trade.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The price of wheat relative to cloth determines land-labor ratios by incentivizing shifts in resource allocation. With an increased labor supply, cloth output rises while wheat output falls, as per the Rybczynski theorem.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Relative Price Effect on Land-Labor Ratio

In Podunk, the production functions exhibit constant returns to scale, meaning that the input proportions directly influence outputs. Since wheat is relatively land-intensive compared to cloth, an increase in the price of wheat relative to cloth (\( p \)) incentivizes producers to allocate more land to wheat production. Conversely, if the price of cloth relative to wheat increases, producers will allocate less land to wheat. Thus, the relative price \( p \) determines the land-labor ratios in these industries, affecting how resources are allocated between wheat and cloth.
02

Analyzing Supply and Demand Equilibrium in the Edgeworth Box

The Edgeworth box represents the relative allocations of land and labor between wheat and cloth. The price \( p \) dictates how resources are allocated between these two goods. If land is on the vertical axis and labor on the horizontal, then an optimal allocation will occur where the isocost line (reflecting \( p \)) is tangent to both industries' production possibilities. Changes in \( p \) shift these tangencies, altering input ratios for both goods.
03

Visualizing the Rybczynski Effect with Labor Increase

In an Edgeworth box, if the supply of labor in Podunk increases due to "external forces," we reconsider the intersection points. As labor supply expands, holding \( p \) constant (price-taker assumption), the new equilibrium shifts toward more labor utilization by the less labor-intensive industry, which is cloth in this scenario. The labor increase pushes the cloth output possibility outward, while wheat, being more land-dependent, utilizes relatively less of the newly abundant labor, hence reducing its output. This counterintuitive result, where the output of the labor-intensive good (cloth) rises and the land-intensive good (wheat) falls, is the essence of the Rybczynski theorem.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Edgeworth Box
The Edgeworth Box is a graphical tool used in economics to show how different factors of production, like land and labor, are distributed between two different industries or goods. Imagine it like a rectangle, where one axis represents land, and the other represents labor. Every point inside the box represents a possible allocation of these resources between two goods, such as wheat and cloth. The production possibilities are illustrated by the curves within the box, reflecting how resources can be split while considering inputs needed for both products.

In the context of Podunk, wheat and cloth are the two goods plotted within the Edgeworth Box. The relative price, denoted as \( p \), of these goods plays a critical role. When the price of wheat is high compared to cloth, more land resources will be allocated to wheat production, thereby shifting the balance in the Edgeworth box towards wheat. By adjusting the allocation of labor and land, it's possible to find the optimal point where both goods are produced most efficiently given the resources available.
Constant Returns to Scale
Constant returns to scale is a concept in production theory, where increasing the inputs - like land and labor - by a certain proportion results in an increase in output by the same proportion. In simpler terms, if you double the inputs, you double the output.

For Podunk, this means that producers of wheat and cloth can enlarge their operations without facing inefficiencies or diminishing returns. This efficiency is essential because it allows Podunk's economy to adjust smoothly to changes, such as fluctuations in international prices. If resource allocation changes, the flexibility afforded by constant returns to scale ensures that the output can still meet the demands of the market effectively.
  • Ensures flexibility in resource allocation.
  • Facilitates efficient scaling of production.
  • Keeps proportionate output to input ratio constant.
International Trade Theory
International Trade Theory encompasses various principles explaining why and how countries engage in the trade of goods and services. One of these concepts is the Rybczynski Theorem, significant in the context of the theorem when a small country like Podunk trades freely with a larger world market.

According to these theories, a small country’s market conditions can be viewed as a "price-taker" where it cannot influence international prices but can trade freely at prevailing global prices. This situation implies that if there's an external increase in the supply of labor due to international trade, adjustments happen in the outputs of different goods, as evidenced by the Rybczynski Theorem. Here, more labor availability leads to an increased production of the labor-intensive good (cloth for Podunk) while decreasing the production of the land-intensive good (wheat). This dynamic showcases how international trade can influence domestic production structures through changes in resource availability.
Land-Labor Ratio
The land-labor ratio is a critical factor in determining how resources are allocated in different industries, especially in a country like Podunk that relies on agricultural production. It indicates how much land is used per unit of labor in producing a good. In Podunk, wheat production is relatively land-intensive, meaning it uses more land relative to labor compared to cloth.

If the price of wheat increases compared to cloth, producers are encouraged to adjust the land-labor ratio to favor wheat, allocating more land to its production. Conversely, if cloth becomes more lucrative, the ratio shifts to allocate less land to wheat in favor of cloth production. Understanding the land-labor ratio helps explain how different sectors of the economy respond to price changes and available resources.
  • Guides how resources are distributed between goods.
  • Influences reaction to price changes in the market.
  • Essential for optimizing production in land vs. labor-intensive industries.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider an economy with just one technique available for the production of each good. $$\begin{array}{lcc} \hline \text { Good } & \text { Food } & \text { Cloth } \\ \hline \text { Labor per unit output } & 1 & 1 \\ \text { Land per unit output } & 2 & 1 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ a. Suppose land is unlimited but labor cquals 100 . Write and sketch the production possibility fronticr. b. Suppose labor is unlimited but land equals \(150 .\) Write and sketch the production possibility frontier. c. Suppose labor equals 100 and land equals \(150 .\) Write and sketch the production possibility frontier. Hint: What are the intercepts of the production possibility fronticr? When is land fully employed? Labor? Both? d. Explain why the production possibility frontier of part (c) is concave. e. Sketch the relative price of food as a function of its output in part (c). f. If consumers insist on trading 4 units of food for 5 units of cloth, what is the relative price of food? Why? g. Explain why production is exactly the same at a price ratio of \(p_{F} / p_{C}=1.1\) as at \(p_{F} / p_{C}=1.9\) h. Suppose that capital is also required for producing food and clothing and that capital requirements per unit of food and per unit of clothing are 0.8 and \(0.9,\) respectively. There are 100 units of capital available. What is the production possibility curve in this case? Answer part (e) for this case.

Suppose the production possibility frontier for guns \((x)\) and butter \((y)\) is given by \\[ x^{2}+2 y^{2}=900 \\] a. Graph this frontier b. If individuals always prefer consumption bundles in which \(y=2 x,\) how much \(x\) and \(y\) will be produced? c. At the point described in part (b), what will be the \(R P T\) and hence what price ratio will cause production to take place at that point? (This slope should be approximated by considering small changes in \(x\) and \(y\) around the optimal point. d. Show your solution on the figure from part (a).

Suppose that Robinson Crusoe produces and consumes fish \((F)\) and coconuts \((C) .\) Assume that, during a certain period, he has decided to work 200 hours and is indifferent as to whether he spends this time fishing or gathering coconuts. Robinson's production for fish is given by \\[ F=\sqrt{l_{F}} \\] and for coconuts by \\[ C=\sqrt{l_{C}} \\] where \(l_{F}\) and \(l_{C}\) are the number of hours spent fishing or gathering coconuts. Consequently, \\[ l_{C}+l_{F}=200 \\] Robinson Crusoe's utility for fish and coconuts is given by \\[ \text { utility }=\sqrt{\boldsymbol{F} \cdot \boldsymbol{C}} \\] a. If Robinson cannot trade with the rest of the world, how will he choose to allocate his labor? What will the optimal levels of \(F\) and \(C\) be? What will his utility be? What will be the \(R P T\) (of fish for coconuts)? b. Suppose now that trade is opened and Robinson can trade fish and coconuts at a price ratio of \(p_{F} / p_{C}=2 / 1 .\) If Robinson continues to produce the quantities of \(F\) and \(C\) from part \((a)\) what will he choose to consume once given the opportunity to trade? What will his new level of utility be? c. How would your answer to part (b) change if Robinson adjusts his production to take advantage of the world prices? d. Graph your results for parts (a), (b), and (c).

Smith and Jones are stranded on a desert island. Each has in his possession some slices of ham \((H)\) and cheese \((C) .\) Smith is a very choosy eater and will eat ham and cheese only in the fixed proportions of 2 slices of cheese to 1 slice of ham. His utility function is given by \(U_{S}=\min (H, C / 2)\) Jones is more flexible in his dietary tastes and has a utility function given by \(U_{J}=4 H+3 C .\) Total endowments are 100 slices of ham and 200 slices of cheese. a. Draw the Edgeworth box diagram that represents the possibilities for exchange in this situation. What is the only exchange ratio that can prevail in any equilibrium? b. Suppose Smith initially had \(40 \mathrm{H}\) and \(80 \mathrm{C}\). What would the equilibrium position be? c. Suppose Smith initially had \(60 \mathrm{H}\) and \(80 \mathrm{C}\). What would the equilibrium position be? d. Suppose Smith (much the stronger of the two) decides not to play by the rules of the game. Then what could the final equilibrium position be?

In the country of Ruritania there are two regions, \(A\) and \(B\). Two goods \((x \text { and } y)\) are produced in both regions. Production functions for region \(A\) are given by \\[ \begin{array}{l} x_{A}=\sqrt{l_{x}} \\ y_{A}=\sqrt{l_{y}} \end{array} \\] here \(l_{x}\) and \(l_{y}\) are the quantities of labor devoted to \(x\) and \(y\) production, respectively. Total labor available in region \(A\) is 100 units; that is, \\[ l_{x}+l_{y}=100 \\] Using a similar notation for region \(B\), production functions are given by \\[ \begin{array}{l} x_{B}=\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{l_{x}} \\ y_{B}=\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{l_{y}} \end{array} \\] There are also 100 units of labor available in region \(B:\) \\[ l_{x}+l_{y}=100 \\] a. Calculate the production possibility curves for regions \(A\) and \(B\). b. What condition must hold if production in Ruritania is to be allocated efficicntly between regions \(A\) and \(B\) (assuming labor cannot move from one region to the other)? c. Calculate the production possibility curve for Ruritania (again assuming labor is immobile between regions \() .\) How much total \(y\) can Ruritania produce if total \(x\) output is \(12 ?\) Hint: \(\mathrm{A}\) graphical analysis may be of some help here.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free