Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose the total-cost function for a firm is given by \\[ C=q(v+2 \sqrt{v w}+w) \\] a. Use Shephard's lemma to compute the constant output demand function for each input, \(k\) and \(i\) b. Use the results from part (a) to compute the underlying production function for \(q\) c. You can check the result by using results from Example 10.2 to show that the CES cost function with \(\sigma=0.5, \rho=-1\) generates this total-cost function.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The input demands are \( v^* = q(1 + \frac{\sqrt{w}}{\sqrt{v}}) \) and \( w^* = q(1 + \frac{\sqrt{v}}{\sqrt{w}}) \) with the production function being \( q = v + w \).

Step by step solution

01

Apply Shephard's Lemma

Shephard's lemma states that the derivative of the total cost function with respect to the price of an input gives the conditional factor demand for that input. For input \( v \), the partial derivative is \( \frac{\partial C}{\partial v} = q(1 + \frac{\sqrt{w}}{\sqrt{v}}) \). For input \( w \), the partial derivative is \( \frac{\partial C}{\partial w} = q(1 + \frac{\sqrt{v}}{\sqrt{w}}) \). These equations give the demand functions for inputs \( v \) and \( w \).
02

Derive the Production Function from Input Demands

We have the input demand functions from Step 1. Assume the firm uses inputs optimally, and production is given by a function \( q = f(v, w) \). The derived input demand functions suggest a specific formulation of the production function. By rearranging, one might infer that the production involves a relation like \( q^2 = v + 2\sqrt{vw} + w \), leading to \( q = v + w \) (under choosing equal inputs).
03

Verify with CES Cost Function

From Example 10.2, the CES cost function with elasticity of substitution \( \sigma=0.5 \) and \( \rho=-1 \) is mathematically identical to \( C(q) = q(v + 2 \sqrt{vw} + w) \). This verifies the compatibility and consistency of the original cost function with its derived forms under the given parameters.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Shephard's Lemma
Shephard's Lemma is a key principle in microeconomics which links cost functions to input demand functions. It can be particularly helpful when analyzing how firms choose their mix of inputs to minimize costs while producing a given level of output.
  • **Partial Derivatives**: The lemma states that if you take the derivative of a cost function concerning an input's price, you get the conditional demand function for that input.
  • **Applications**: This helps in understanding how changes in input costs influence the amounts of each input a firm demands.
In the given problem, the cost function is differentiated concerning inputs \( v \) and \( w \). This yields the functions \( \frac{\partial C}{\partial v} = q(1 + \frac{\sqrt{w}}{\sqrt{v}}) \) and \( \frac{\partial C}{\partial w} = q(1 + \frac{\sqrt{v}}{\sqrt{w}}) \).
These equations represent the demand functions for the respective inputs, emphasizing Shephard's lemma's application. They reflect how the quantity demanded for inputs \( v \) and \( w \) depend on their respective prices, given the constant output \( q \).

This is crucial for firms aiming to adjust their input mix in response to price changes, ensuring efficient production.
Production Function
The production function is an equation that expresses the relationship between inputs used by a firm and the resulting output. It is foundational to understanding how firms optimize their output given constraints like cost and input availability.
  • **Understanding Inputs and Outputs**: The production function shows how various combinations of inputs like labor and capital can produce output.
  • **Function Form**: Companies often assume specific forms depending on their technological capabilities.
In the problem exercise, after computing the input demand functions from Shephard's lemma, the production function \( q = f(v, w) \) emerges.
The transformation suggests the relationship \( q^2 = v + 2\sqrt{vw} + w \), simplifying to \( q = v + w \) under certain symmetrical conditions.
This derivation shows how understanding the input costs and their optimal utilization leads to insights into the overall production process of a firm, guiding them towards production efficiency.
CES Cost Function
The CES, or Constant Elasticity of Substitution, cost function, is a specific form of cost function that helps to express how easily inputs in production can be substituted for one another. It provides insights into the flexibility of production processes and helps firms manage input combinations effectively.
  • **Elasticity**: This parameter measures the ease of substituting one input for another while maintaining the same level of output.
  • **Parameters in CES**: The function includes parameters like \( \sigma \) (the elasticity of substitution) and \( \rho \) which influences the shape of the cost function.
In the problem context, the CES cost function, with \( \sigma = 0.5 \) and \( \rho = -1 \), results in a mathematically identical form to the original total-cost function, \( C(q) = q(v + 2 \sqrt{vw} + w) \).
This alignment confirms that the initial cost function can adequately reflect the firm's cost structure when the inputs are substitutable in a specific manner depicted by the CES framework.
Such a function is particularly useful for firms in dynamic markets where input prices fluctuate, as it helps to understand how changes in input costs might impact overall expenses without sacrificing output levels. By grasping the utility of the CES cost function, firms can strategically plan for varying production conditions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that a firm produces two different outputs, the quantities of which are represented by \(q_{1}\) and \(q_{2}\) In general, the firm's total costs can be represented by \(C\left(q_{1}, q_{2}\right) .\) This function exhibits economies of scope if \(C\left(q_{1}, 0\right)+C\left(0, q_{2}\right)>C\left(q_{1}, q_{2}\right)\) for all output levels of either good. a. Explain in words why this mathematical formulation implies that costs will be lower in this multiproduct firm than in two single-product firms producing each good separately. b. If the two outputs are actually the same good, we can define total output as \(q=q_{1}+q_{2}\) Suppose that in this case average cost \((=C / q)\) falls as \(q\) increases. Show that this firm also enjoys economies of scope under the definition provided here.

A firm producing hockey sticks has a production function given by \\[ q=2 \sqrt{k \cdot l} \\] In the short run, the firm's amount of capital equipment is fixed at \(k=100 .\) The rental rate for \(k\) is \(v=\$ 1,\) and the wage rate for \(l\) is \(w=\$ 4\) a. Calculate the firm's short-run total cost curve. Calculate the short-run average cost curve. b. What is the firm's short-run marginal cost function? What are the \(S C, S A C\), and \(S M C\) for the firm if it produces 25 hockey sticks? Fifty hockey sticks? One hundred hockey sticks? Two hundred hockey sticks? c. Graph the \(S A C\) and the \(S M C\) curves for the firm. Indicate the points found in part (b). d. Where does the \(S M C\) curve intersect the \(S A C\) curve? Explain why the \(S M C\) curve will always intersect the \(S A C\) curve at its lowest point. Suppose now that capital used for producing hockey sticks is fixed at \(\bar{k}\) in the short run. e. Calculate the firm's total costs as a function of \(q, w, v,\) and \(\bar{k}\) f. Given \(q, w,\) and \(v,\) how should the capital stock be chosen to minimize total cost? g. Use your results from part (f) to calculate the long-run total cost of hockey stick production. h. For \(w=\$ 4, v=\$ 1,\) graph the long-run total cost curve for hockey stick production. Show that this is an envelope for the short-run curves computed in part (a) by examining values of \(\bar{k}\) of \(100,200,\) and 400

In a famous article [J. Viner, "Cost Curves and Supply Curves," Zeitschrift fur Nationalokonomie 3 \(\text { (September }1931): 23-46],\) Viner criticized his draftsman who could not draw a family of \(\underline{S A C}\) curves whose points of tangency with the U-shaped \(A C\) curve were also the minimum points on each \(S A C\) curve. The draftsman protested that such a drawing was impossible to construct. Whom would you support in this debate?

Professor Smith and Professor Jones are going to produce a new introductory textbook. As true scientists, they have laid out the production function for the book as \\[ q=S^{1 / 2} J^{1 / 2} \\] where \(q=\) the number of pages in the finished book, \(S=\) the number of working hours spent by Smith, and \(J=\) the number of hours spent working by Jones. Smith values his labor as \(\$ 3\) per working hour. He has spent 900 hours preparing the first draft. Jones, whose labor is valued at \(\$ 12\) per working hour, will revise Smith's draft to complete the book. a. How many hours will Jones have to spend to produce a finished book of 150 pages? Of 300 pages? Of 450 pages? b. What is the marginal cost of the 150 th page of the finished book? Of the 300 th page? Of the 450 th page?

An enterprising entrepreneur purchases two firms to produce widgets. Each firm produces identical products, and each has a production function given by \\[ q=\sqrt{k_{i} l_{i}}, \quad i=1,2 \\] The firms differ, however, in the amount of capital equipment each has. In particular, firm I has \(k_{1}=25\) whereas firm 2 has \(k_{2}=100 .\) Rental rates for \(k\) and \(l\) are given by \(w=v=\$ 1\) a. If the entrepreneur wishes to minimize short-run total costs of widget production, how should output be allocated between the two firms? b. Given that output is optimally allocated between the two firms, calculate the short-run total, average, and marginal cost curves. What is the marginal cost of the 100 th widget? The 125 th widget? The 200 th widget? c. How should the entrepreneur allocate widget production between the two firms in the long run? Calculate the long-run total, average, and marginal cost curves for widget production. d. How would your answer to part (c) change if both firms exhibited diminishing returns to scale?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free