Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In each case, show that \(T\) is an isomorphism by defining \(T^{-1}\) explicitly. a. \(T: \mathbf{P}_{n} \rightarrow \mathbf{P}_{n}\) is given by \(T[p(x)]=p(x+1)\). b. \(T: \mathbf{M}_{n n} \rightarrow \mathbf{M}_{n n}\) is given by \(T(A)=U A\) where \(U\) is invertible in \(\mathbf{M}_{n n}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Both transformations are isomorphisms with inverses \( T^{-1}[p(x)] = p(x-1) \) for part (a) and \( T^{-1}(B) = U^{-1}B \) for part (b).

Step by step solution

01

Understand Isomorphism in Linear Algebra

An isomorphism is a bijective linear transformation between two vector spaces. To show that a transformation \( T \) is an isomorphism, we need to prove that it is both injective (one-to-one) and surjective (onto). Additionally, we need to define its inverse \( T^{-1} \) explicitly.
02

Define and Verify the Transformation for Part (a)

For part (a), the transformation \( T : \mathbf{P}_n \to \mathbf{P}_n \) is given by \( T[p(x)] = p(x+1) \). We must show this function is bijective by defining its inverse. Let's define \( T^{-1} : \mathbf{P}_n \to \mathbf{P}_n \) by \( T^{-1}[q(x)] = q(x-1) \). \[T^{-1}[T[p(x)]] = T^{-1}[p(x+1)] = p((x+1)-1) = p(x)\]and\[T[T^{-1}[q(x)]] = T[q(x-1)] = q((x-1)+1) = q(x).\] Thus, \( T^{-1} \) is indeed the inverse of \( T \), establishing that \( T \) is bijective.
03

Define and Verify the Transformation for Part (b)

For part (b), the transformation \( T: \mathbf{M}_{nn} \to \mathbf{M}_{nn} \) is defined by \( T(A) = UA \), where \( U \) is an invertible matrix. Define \( T^{-1}: \mathbf{M}_{nn} \to \mathbf{M}_{nn} \) by \( T^{-1}(B) = U^{-1}B \). \[T^{-1}[T(A)] = T^{-1}[UA] = U^{-1}(UA) = (U^{-1}U)A = IA = A\]and\[T[T^{-1}(B)] = T[U^{-1}B] = U(U^{-1}B) = (UU^{-1})B = IB = B.\] Therefore, \( T^{-1} \) is the inverse of \( T \), confirming that \( T \) is bijective.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Isomorphism
In linear algebra, an isomorphism is a special kind of transformation. It bridges two vector spaces through a bijective linear transformation. This implies two key characteristics:
  • Injective (One-to-One): Every element in the first vector space maps to a unique element in the second.
  • Surjective (Onto): Every element in the target vector space is accounted for by the mapping.
When a transformation is both injective and surjective, it can be "inverted." This means there exists an inverse function that can map elements back to their original form. Demonstrating that a transformation is an isomorphism involves showing it meets these criteria and explicitly defining this inverse function.
Inverse Function
The concept of an inverse function is essential in isomorphisms. For a function to have an inverse means that each input is linked to a unique output, and vice versa. In other words, if you perform a transformation on data and then apply the inverse transformation, you should retrieve the original data.
When you're asked to explicitly define an inverse function, you're essentially asked to "undo" the transformation. Consider the examples from the exercise:
  • For polynomial transformation, the function that shifts a polynomial by one unit can be undone by shifting back one unit.
  • For matrix transformations, multiplying by an invertible matrix can be undone by multiplying by its inverse.
The inverse functions, therefore, prove that both transformations can be reversed correctly.
Bijective
A function is bijective if it is both injective and surjective. Bijectivity is fundamental to proving that a transformation is an isomorphism.
Bijection means:
  • Injective: The function never maps two different elements of the domain to the same point in the codomain. Thus, each input has a unique output.
  • Surjective: The function covers the entire codomain, meaning every possible output is used at least once.
In the context of the exercise, establishing bijectivity involves showing that each transformation grabs every bit of the codomain, exhibiting a perfect pairing between the domain and codomain.
Invertible Matrix
An invertible matrix is a key player in transformations that are isomorphisms. A matrix is said to be invertible if there exists another matrix that, when multiplied with it, results in the identity matrix. This property is crucial for defining inverse functions in transformations.
Key properties of invertible matrices include:
  • The determinant of an invertible matrix is non-zero.
  • Multiplying an invertible matrix by its inverse returns an identity matrix.
In part (b) of the exercise, the transformation relies on multiplying by an invertible matrix. The ability to invert the matrix makes it possible to apply the transformation and then apply its inverse to return to the start. This provides a concrete example of how invertible matrices work in practice to define bijective transformations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that linear independence is preserved by one-to-one transformations and that spanning sets are preserved by onto transformations. More precisely, if \(T: V \rightarrow W\) is a linear transformation, show that: a. If \(T\) is one-to-one and \(\left\\{\mathbf{v}_{1}, \ldots, \mathbf{v}_{n}\right\\}\) is independent in \(V,\) then \(\left\\{T\left(\mathbf{v}_{1}\right), \ldots, T\left(\mathbf{v}_{n}\right)\right\\}\) is independent in \(W\) b. If \(T\) is onto and \(V=\operatorname{span}\left\\{\mathbf{v}_{1}, \ldots, \mathbf{v}_{n}\right\\},\) then \(W=\operatorname{span}\left\\{T\left(\mathbf{v}_{1}\right), \ldots, T\left(\mathbf{v}_{n}\right)\right\\}\)

Consider $$ V=\left\\{\left[\begin{array}{ll} a & b \\ c & d \end{array}\right] \mid a+c=b+d\right\\} $$ a. Consider \(S: \mathbf{M}_{22} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) with \(S\left[\begin{array}{cc}a & b \\ c & d\end{array}\right]=a+c-\) \(b-d\). Show that \(S\) is linear and onto and that \(V\) is a subspace of \(\mathbf{M}_{22}\). Compute \(\operatorname{dim} V\). b. Consider \(T: V \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) with \(T\left[\begin{array}{ll}a & b \\\ c & d\end{array}\right]=a+c\). Show that \(T\) is linear and onto, and use this information to compute \(\operatorname{dim}(\) ker \(T)\).

Let \(T: V \rightarrow V\) be a linear transformation where \(V\) is finite dimensional. Show that exactly one of (i) and (ii) holds: (i) \(T(\mathbf{v})=\mathbf{0}\) for some \(\mathbf{v} \neq \mathbf{0}\) in \(V\) (ii) \(T(\mathbf{x})=\mathbf{v}\) has a solution \(\mathbf{x}\) in \(V\) for every \(\mathbf{v}\) in \(V\).

Show that the following are equivalent for a linear transformation \(T: V \rightarrow W\). 1\. ker \(T=V\) 2\. \(\operatorname{im} T=\\{\mathbf{0}\\}\) 3\. \(T=0\)

Given linear transformations \(V \stackrel{T}{\rightarrow} W \stackrel{S}{\rightarrow} U\) a. If \(S\) and \(T\) are both one-to-one, show that \(S T\) is one-to-one. b. If \(S\) and \(T\) are both onto, show that \(S T\) is onto.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free