Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The state legislature mandates a price floor for gasoline of PF per gallon. Assess the following statements and illustrate your answer using the figure provided.

  1. Proponents of the law claim it will increase the income of gas station owners. Opponents claim it will hurt gas station owners because they will lose customers.
  2. Proponents claim consumers will be better off because gas stations will provide better service. Opponents claim consumers will be generally worse off because they prefer to buy gas at cheaper prices.
  3. Proponents claim that they are helping gas station owners without hurting anyone else. Opponents claim that consumers are hurt and will end up doing things like buying gas in a nearby state or on the black market.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. Both proponents and opponents are correct.
  2. Both proponents and opponents are correct.
  3. Proponents are wrong, and opponents are correct.

Step by step solution

01

Explanation for part (a)

The gas owner who sells at the regulated price will gain from the sales operation. But the gas owner who sells at the equilibrium price will lose as they could not earn more revenue. The movement from point E to A shows the fall in demand at the regulated price. Hence, both proponents and opponents are correct.

02

Explanation for part (b)

Yes, the proponents are correct; if the consumer pays higher than the equilibrium price, those consumers will receive better service; hence, the gas owner competes over quality rather than price. The opponents are also correct as the consumer paying the mandated price would be satisfied by paying the equilibrium price; thus, they are worse off. The movement from point E to A shows the fall in demand at the regulated price.

03

Explanation for part (c)

Proponents are incorrect as the consumer is worse off by paying more than the equilibrium price. The opponents are correct as price floor will waste resources as consumers who travel to other states waste their time. The floor price also leads to black marketing as the consumer requires quantity above the corresponding quantity at point A. Both consumer and gas owners will indulge in black marketing.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

True or false? Explain your answer. A price ceiling below the equilibrium price of an otherwise efficient market does the following:

  1. Increases quantity supplied
  2. Makes some people who want to consume the good worse off
  3. Makes all producers worse off

Question: Explain how each of the following illustrates one of the three principles of economy-wide interactions.

  1. The White House urged Congress to pass a package of temporary spending increases and tax cuts in early 2009, a time when employment was plunging and unemployment soaring.
  2. With oil prices plummeting, Canadian and U.S. oil companies have been forced to shut down their productive wells. In cities throughout North Dakota, Wyoming, Taxes, and Alaska, restaurants and other consumer businesses are failing.
  3. In the mid-2000s, Spain, which was experiencing a big housing boom, also had the highest inflation rate in Europe.

How did lenders benefit from the restriction on the number of New York City taxi medallions?

Assume that the quota limit is 8 million rides. Suppose demand decreases due to a decline in tourism. What is the smallest parallel leftward shift in demand that would result in the quota no longer having an effect on the market? Illustrate your answer using Figure 4-7.

Suppose that the supply and demand for taxi rides is given by Figure 4-7 but the quota is set at 6 million rides instead of 8 million. Find the following and indicate them on Figure 4-7.

  1. The price of a ride
  2. The quota rent
  3. Suppose the quota limit on taxi rides is increased to 9 million. What happens to the quota rent?
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free