Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What is the source of Li & Fung’s success? Is it based on human capital, on ownership of a natural resource, or on ownership of capital?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The Li & Fung success is based on human capital

Step by step solution

01

Reason behind Li & Fung’s success

The founder of this company was able to start this because he was fluent in English, which was an essential value-added ability. This ability of the founder exhibits human capital.

After that, the company expanded its business as a supply chain manager. The company succeeded because its employees found cost-effective ways to provide different services from various countries. The company’s employees and management were providing a business structure that does not require ownership of a natural resource or capital to run the business.

Therefore, human capital is the reason behind the success of Li & Fung’s success.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Over the years, the WTO has increasingly found itself adjudicating trade disputes that involve not just tariffs or quota restrictions but also restrictions based on quality, health, and environmental considerations. Why do you think this has occurred? What method would you, as a WTO official, use to decide whether a quality, health, or environmental restriction is in violation of a free-trade agreement?

Explain the following patterns of trade using the Heckscher–Ohlin model.

a.France exports wine to the United States, and the United States exports movies to France.

b.Brazil exports shoes to the United States, and the United States exports shoe-making machinery to Brazil.

What principle do you think underlies Li & Fung’s decisions on how to allocate production of a good's inputs and its final assembly among various countries?

In the United States, the opportunity cost of 1 ton of corn is 50 bicycles. In China, the opportunity cost of 1 bicycle is 0.01 tons of corn.

a.Determine the pattern of comparative advantage.

b.In autarky, the United States can produce 200,000 bicycles if no corn is produced, and China can produce 3,000 tons of corn if no bicycles are produced. Draw each country’s production possibility frontier assuming constant opportunity cost, with tons of corn on the vertical axis and bicycles on the horizontal axis.

c.With trade, each country specializes in its production. The United States consumes 1,000 tons of corn and 200,000 bicycles; China consumes 3,000 tons of corn and 100,000 bicycles. Indicate the production and consumption points on your diagrams, and use them to explain the gains from trade.

Why do you think a retailer prefers to have Li & Fung arrange international production of its jeans rather than purchase them directly from a jeans manufacturer in mainland China?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free