Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Over the years, the WTO has increasingly found itself adjudicating trade disputes that involve not just tariffs or quota restrictions but also restrictions based on quality, health, and environmental considerations. Why do you think this has occurred? What method would you, as a WTO official, use to decide whether a quality, health, or environmental restriction is in violation of a free-trade agreement?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  • Countries tend to protect their domestic producers through restrictions but do not want to violate the free trade agreements of the WTO. Therefore, they put restrictions on imports claiming quality concerns.
  • A WTO official should crosscheck the claims made by the importing country and check whether the claim is legitimate or not.

Step by step solution

01

Reason behind countries restricting imports based on quality, health, and environmental concerns

The WTO is an international organization that advocates free trade between member countries. It is also responsible for settling trade disputes between nations. Many countries try to implement trade-restrictive policies to protect their domestic producers, citing quality, health, or environmental concerns.

Suppose a country is in a free trade agreement with another country. It wants to implement a restrictive trade policy on a good from that country, but it cannot do so because it will violate the trade agreements with that country. Thus, the country will try to restrict the import of the good indirectly based on quality, health, and environmental concerns.

02

Step to be taken by a WTO official

A WTO official should crosscheck the claims made by the import restricting country for good. It should do a quality check of the imported good and find out whether the claim made by importing country is true or not.

If the claim comes out to be true, then the provided reasons are legitimate and will not come under any trade violations. But if the claims are false, then the officer will take necessary actions against it for violating the trade agreement.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the United States, the opportunity cost of 1 ton of corn is 50 bicycles. In China, the opportunity cost of 1 bicycle is 0.01 tons of corn.

a.Determine the pattern of comparative advantage.

b.In autarky, the United States can produce 200,000 bicycles if no corn is produced, and China can produce 3,000 tons of corn if no bicycles are produced. Draw each countryโ€™s production possibility frontier assuming constant opportunity cost, with tons of corn on the vertical axis and bicycles on the horizontal axis.

c.With trade, each country specializes in its production. The United States consumes 1,000 tons of corn and 200,000 bicycles; China consumes 3,000 tons of corn and 100,000 bicycles. Indicate the production and consumption points on your diagrams, and use them to explain the gains from trade.

What is the source of Li & Fungโ€™s success? Is it based on human capital, on ownership of a natural resource, or on ownership of capital?

Suppose the government imposes an import quota rather than a tariff on butter. What quota limit would generate the same quantity of imports as a tariff of $0.50 per pound?

Suppose the world price of butter is \(0.50 per pound and the domestic price in autarky is \)1.00 per pound. Use a diagram similar to Figure 5-10 to show the following.

a.If there is free trade, domestic butter producers want the government to impose a tariff of no less than\(0.50 per pound. Compare the outcome with a tariff of \)0.25 per pound.

b.What happens if a tariff greater than $0.50 per pound is imposed?

Due to a strike by truckers, trade in food between the United States and Mexico is halted. In autarky, the price of Mexican grapes is lower than that of U.S. grapes. Using a diagram of the U.S. domestic demand curve and the U.S. domestic supply curve for grapes, explain the effect of the strike on the following.

a.U.S. grape consumersโ€™ surplus

b.U.S. grape producersโ€™ surplus

c.U.S. total surplus

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free