Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose the world price of butter is \(0.50 per pound and the domestic price in autarky is \)1.00 per pound. Use a diagram similar to Figure 5-10 to show the following.

a.If there is free trade, domestic butter producers want the government to impose a tariff of no less than\(0.50 per pound. Compare the outcome with a tariff of \)0.25 per pound.

b.What happens if a tariff greater than $0.50 per pound is imposed?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. A tariff of $0.50 per pound on butter will increase the price to $1.00 in the domestic market, which is the autarky price. There will be no demand for imports.

A tariff of $0.25 per pound on butter will increase the price level to $0.75, which is less than the autarky price. The amount of imports will be less than the free trade import size.

b. There will be no import if a tariff greater than $0.50 is imposed on the imported quantity of butter.

Step by step solution

01

Impact of tariff is no less than $0.50 and $0.25 per pound

The following depicts the domestic market of butter. The autarky price of $1.00 per pound lies at the equilibrium position, e. At this price level, the domestic quantity supplied is equal to the domestic quantity demanded. The world price of butter is $0.50, which is lower than the autarky price. Import is the gap between QS and QD.

  • If the government decides to go with producers' demand and impose a tariff of $0.50 per pound on the imported quantity of butter, the price of butter in the domestic market will reach $0.1 per pound ($0.50 + 0.50). The price of $1.00 is also the autarky price for butter in the domestic market. The domestic quantity supplied is equal to the domestic quantity demanded at this price level. The gap between QD and QS will be zero. The import will reduce to zero.
  • If the government decides to impose a tariff of $0.25 on the imported quantity of butter, then the price of butter will increase to $0.75 per pound. At this price level, the quantity supplied has increased to QsT, and the quantity demanded has decreased to QDT. It shows that the gap between the quantity demanded and quantity supplied has decreased. Thus, the imported quantity of butter will reduce.
02

Effect of a tariff greater than $0.50 per pound on butter.

At the autarky price level of $1.00, the domestic quantity supplied is equal to the domestic quantity demanded in the market. If the government decides to impose a tariff of more than $0.50 per pound, the imported price of butter will exceed the autarky price. No consumer will buy the imported good as the price is greater than the domestic price.

Hence, the importers will not import any quantity of butter in the market at any tariff equal to $0.50 per pound or above. Thus, the import will be blocked if the government imposes a tariff greater than $0.50 per pound.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Why do you think it was profitable for Li & Fung to go beyond brokering exports to becoming a supply chain manager, breaking down the production process and sourcing the inputs from various suppliers across many countries?

What principle do you think underlies Li & Fungโ€™s decisions on how to allocate production of a good's inputs and its final assembly among various countries?

Over the years, the WTO has increasingly found itself adjudicating trade disputes that involve not just tariffs or quota restrictions but also restrictions based on quality, health, and environmental considerations. Why do you think this has occurred? What method would you, as a WTO official, use to decide whether a quality, health, or environmental restriction is in violation of a free-trade agreement?

What effect do you think the strike will have on Mexican grape producers? Mexican grape pickers? Mexican grape consumers? U.S. grape pickers?

In the United States, the opportunity cost of 1 ton of corn is 50 bicycles. In China, the opportunity cost of 1 bicycle is 0.01 tons of corn.

a.Determine the pattern of comparative advantage.

b.In autarky, the United States can produce 200,000 bicycles if no corn is produced, and China can produce 3,000 tons of corn if no bicycles are produced. Draw each countryโ€™s production possibility frontier assuming constant opportunity cost, with tons of corn on the vertical axis and bicycles on the horizontal axis.

c.With trade, each country specializes in its production. The United States consumes 1,000 tons of corn and 200,000 bicycles; China consumes 3,000 tons of corn and 100,000 bicycles. Indicate the production and consumption points on your diagrams, and use them to explain the gains from trade.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free