Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Use the distinction between the characteristics of private goods and public goods to determine whether the following should be produced through the market system or provided by government: (a) French fries, (b) airport screening, (c) court systems, (d) mail delivery, and (e) medical care. Explain your answers.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. Market system as this has features of a private good.

  2. Government as this has features of a public good.

  3. Government as this has features of a public good.

  4. Government as this has features of a public good.

  5. Market system as this has features of a private good

Step by step solution

01

Meaning of a private and a public good 

A private good has rival consumption, which means if one person consumes a unit of a private good, the others will not be able to consume the same unit of that good. The producer of a private good can use a price mechanism to exclude people. Thus, the market system should provide these goods.

For example, a bag of chips is a private good because it costs money to purchase this good. All the people who can pay the price (say $1) will be able to enjoy the benefits of this good, and others will be excluded. Also, if one bag of chips is consumed by one customer, others will not be able to consume that particular bag of chips.

A public good has non-rival consumption, which means if one person consumes a public good, the others will still be able to consume the good. People simultaneously can consume the public good. The producer of a public good cannot charge prices, and therefore, the exclusion is not possible, which leads to the free riders. Thus, the government should provide these goods.

For example, national defense is a public good, no one can be excluded from using it, and the use of one person does not reduce the availability for other people. People can benefit by using the good simultaneously.

02

Explanation for part (a)

French fries have both rival and excludability features of a private good.

  • A person can only consume french fries if they pay for them.

  • If one person consumes french fries, it affects the consumption of other people by decreasing the available quantity.

Thus, it should be provided by the market system as there is a possibility to earn profits.

03

Explanation for part (b)

Airport screening has both non-rival and non-excludability features of a public good.

  • All those who are at the airport will get the benefit of watching screening without even paying.

  • All the people can watch the screening simultaneously. The consumption by one will not reduce the availability of screening for others.

Thus, it should be provided by the government as the market has no incentive to provide this public good.

04

Explanation for part (c)

The Court system is a part of the constitution of any nation that ensures fairness injustice. People are not excluded by charging prices for various procedures and are provided with resources to ensure equal treatment. The consumption of such services is not restricted and is available for all. There is no rivalry in consumption either.

Thus, the court system should be treated as a public good and therefore should be provided by the government.

05

Explanation for part (d)

The mail delivery system is a private good, and accordingly, should be provided by the market system. One can exclude people from getting their mails if they haven’t paid for it, and the time spent on providing delivery to one person reduces the available time for the other.

Given the above, from the point of view of equal access to information and promoting society’s welfare, the government should provide it. Therefore, a mail delivery system can be provided by both the government and the market system.

06

Explanation for part (e)

Medical care is a private good, and accordingly, should be provided by the market system. One can exclude people from getting medical services by charging money for such services. Also, the consumption of one reduces affects the consumption by the others.

However, given the above features, equal access to healthcare demands the government to step in for the people who cannot afford medical services. Therefore, healthcare can be provided by both the government and the market system.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain: “Politicians would make more rational economic decisions if they weren’t running for re-election every few years.”

Does traditional one-person-one-vote (1p1v) majority voting allow voters to directly express differences in strengths of preference? Does quadratic voting do any better? Discuss the differences and then explain which system you prefer, and why.

We can apply voting paradoxes to the highway construction example of Table 5.2. Suppose there are only five people in a society, and each favors one of the five highway construction options listed in Table 5.2 (“No new construction” is one of the five options). Explain which of these highway options will be selected using a majority paired-choice vote. Will this option be the optimal size of the project from an economic perspective?

Plan
Total cost of project (\()
Marginal cost (\))
Total Benefit
Marginal Benefit
Net Benefit (TB-TC)
No new construction
0-0--
A: Widen existing highways
5050200200150
B: New 2-lane highways
14090350150210
C: New 4-lane highways
240100470120230
D: New 6-lane highways
620380580110-40

Jean-Baptiste Colbert was the Minister of Finance under King Louis XIV of France. He famously observed, "The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose as to obtain the largest possible amount of feathers with the smallest possible amount of hissing." How does his comment relate to the special-interest effect?

Critique: “Thank goodness we have so many government regulatory agencies. They keep Big Business in check.”

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free