Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Explain why zoning laws, which allow certain land uses only in specific locations, might be justified in dealing with negative externalities. Explain why in areas where buildings sit close together, tax breaks to property owners for installing extra fire-prevention equipment might be justified due to positive externalities.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The zoning laws protect the environment or the inhabitants who would be affected by the clustering of certain economic activities that create negative externalities in specific regions.

The positive externality effect of installing extra fire prevention equipment in terms of reduced risk of a fire and its potential spread to nearby buildings encourages tax breaks to property owners.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Negative externality and zoning laws

A negative externality occurs when certain economic activities put a cost burden on a party that was not involved or considered while making the market decisions of production or consumption. These are the external costs that impact the well-being of others.

For example, if a person is smoking, it will affect not only his/her health but also the people standing. They are inhaling the smoke even though they are not smoking. Thus, the consumption activity of that person is putting costs on others.

Zoning laws prevent or reduce the external costs of economic activities associated with the use of land by allocating land use according to the regions. It prevents the construction of certain buildings or plants that can have harmful effects on the surroundings in the future. These negative effects are not considered when such buildings are used for economic activities.

For example, the zoning laws prevent the building of a polluting factory near a residential area. People can suffer from diseases and other harmful effects due to the noise, air, or water pollution created by the use of such buildings. Hence, these are justified as they deal with negative externalities.

02

Step 2. Reasons for tax breaks to property owners for installing fire prevention equipment

A positive externality occurs when certain economic activities benefit a party that was not involved or considered while making the market decisions of production or consumption. These are the external benefits that impact the well-being of others.

For example, gardening helps create a beautiful and fresh environment for the passers-by who did not contribute anything to this economic activity.

Fire equipment installed in a building will not only protect that building but will also protect the others by preventing the spread of the fire. This is a case of positive externality where the other buildings are protected indirectly by stopping the fire spread. The other closely located buildings do not directly need to buy and consume fire prevention equipment. These are external benefits that create free riders.

Thus, a tax break to property owners is justified based on the total social benefits of having fire prevention equipment (including both private and external benefits).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Why are spillover costs and spillover benefits also called negative and positive externalities? Show graphically how a tax can correct for a negative externality and how a subsidy to producers can correct for a positive externality. How does a subsidy to consumers differ from a subsidy to producers in correcting a positive externality?

The LoJack car recovery system allows the police to track stolen cars. As a result, they not only recover 90 percent of LoJack-equipped cars that are stolen but also arrest many auto thieves and shut down many โ€œchop shopsโ€ that rip apart stolen vehicles to get their parts. Thus, LoJack provides both private benefits and positive externalities. Should the government consider subsidizing LoJack purchases?

An apple growerโ€™s orchard provides nectar to a neighborโ€™s bees, while the beekeeperโ€™s bees help the apple grower by pollinating his apple blossoms. Use Figure 4.5b to explain why this situation of dual positive externalities might lead to an underallocation of resources to both apple growing and beekeeping. How might this underallocation get resolved via the means suggested by the Coase theorem?

Consider a used-car market with asymmetric information. The owners of used cars know what their vehicles are worth but have no way of credibly demonstrating those values to potential buyers. Thus, potential buyers must always worry that the used car they are being offered may be a low-quality โ€œlemon.โ€

  1. Suppose that there are equal numbers of good and bad used cars in the market. Good used cars are worth \(13,000, and bad used cars are worth \)5,000. What is the average value of a used car?
  2. By how much does the average value exceed the value of a bad used car? By how much does the value of a good used car exceed the average value?
  3. Would a potential seller of a good used car be willing to accept the average value as payment for the vehicle?
  4. If a buyer negotiates with a seller to purchase the sellerโ€™s used car for a price equal to the average value, is the car more likely to be good or bad?
  5. Will the used-car market come to feature mostlyโ€”if not exclusivelyโ€”lemons? Explain. How much will used cars end up costing if all the good cars are withdrawn from the market?

Draw a supply and demand graph, and identify the areas of consumer surplus and producer surplus. Given the demand curve, how will an increase in supply affect the amount of consumer surplus shown in your diagram? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free