Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Why is a quota more detrimental to an economy than a tariff that results in the same level of imports as the quota? What is the net outcome of either tariffs or quota for the world economy?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The government loses tax revenue under quota than a tariff that results in the same level of imports as the quota.

The net outcome of either tariffs or quotas for the world economy is that it loses efficiency.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Tariff and quota

A tariff is a tax that the domestic government imposes on the goods and services imported. Quota is a restriction put on the number of imported goods. The quota is more detrimental than the tariff when the level of imports is the same as the quota. The government incurs a loss in earning, because tariffs are a source of government revenue.

02

Step 2. Net outcome of either tariff or quota

The tariff or quota results in imposing costs for domestic consumers, and it gives profit to domestic producers and the government from tariff revenue. The cost to the domestic consumer is seen from the change in prices of the product. Different studies have concluded that the cost to the consumer is more than the gains to the domestic producers and government; thus, generous cost or loss in efficiency results from trade protection.

There is a loss in efficiency to the entire world if every economy loses efficiency.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that the opportunity-cost ratio for fish and lumber is 1F โ‰ก 1L in Canada but 2F โ‰ก 1L in Iceland. Then ________ should specialize in producing fish while ________ should specialize in producing lumber.

  1. Canada; Iceland

  2. Iceland; Canada

In Country A, a worker can make 5 bicycles per hour. In Country B, a worker can make 7 bicycles per hour. Which country has an absolute advantage in making bicycles?

  1. Country A

  2. Country B

What form does trade adjustment assistance take in the United States? How does such assistance promote political support for free-trade agreements? Do you think workers who lose their jobs because of changes in trade laws deserve special treatment relative to workers who lose their jobs because of other changes in the economy, say, changes in patterns of government spending?

Suppose that if Iceland and Japan were both closed economies, the domestic price of fish would be \(100 per ton in Iceland and \)90 per ton in Japan. If the two countries decided to open up to international trade with each other, which of the following could be the equilibrium international price of fish once they begin trading?

a. \(75

b. \)85

c. \(95

d. \)105

The accompanying hypothetical production possibilities tables are for New Zealand and Spain. Each country can produce apples and plums. Plot the production possibilities data for each of the two countries separately. Referring to your graphs, answer the following:

New Zealandโ€™s Production Possibilities Table (Millions of Bushels)


Production Alternatives

Product

A

B

C

D

Apples

0

20

40

60

Plums

15

10

5

0


Spainโ€™s Production Possibilities Table (Millions of Bushels)


Production Alternatives

Product

R

S

T

U

Apples

0

20

40

60

Plums

60

40

20

0

  1. What is each countryโ€™s cost ratio of producing plums and apples?

  2. Which nation should specialize in which product?

  3. Show the trading possibilities lines for each nation if the actual terms of trade are 1 plum for 2 apples. (Plot these lines on your graph.)

  4. Suppose the optimum product mixes before specialization and trade were alternative B in New Zealand and alternative S in Spain. What would be the gains from specialization and trade?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free