Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Assume that the comparative-cost ratios of two products—baby formula and tuna fish—are as follows in the nations of Canswicki and Tunata:

Canswicki: 1 can baby formula ≡ 2 cans tuna fish

Tunata: 1 can baby formula ≡ 4 cans tuna fish

In what product should each nation specialize? Which of the following terms of trade would be acceptable to both nations: (a) 1 can baby formula ≡ 2 1/2 cans tuna fish; (b) 1 can baby formula ≡ 1 can tuna fish; (c) 1 can baby formula ≡ 5 cans tuna fish?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Canswicki should specialize in baby formula, and Tunata should specialize in tuna fish.

The term of trade that is accepted will be (a).

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Comparative advantage

The comparative advantage on any product will be when the opportunity cost of producing the product is less than the competitor.

The opportunity cost of producing baby formula will be:

Canswicki=2cansoftunafish1canofbabyformula=2cansoftunafishTunata=4cansoftunafish1canofbabyformula=4cansoftunafish

Canswicki has a comparative advantage in the production of baby formula.

The opportunity cost of producing tuna fish will be,

Canswicki=12cansofbabyformulaTunata=14cansofbabyformula

Tunata has a comparative advantage in the production of tuna fish.

02

Step 2. Explanation for acceptable terms of trade

The acceptable terms of trade will be when the opportunity cost of both Canswicki and Tunata will be between the terms of trade.

  1. The terms of trade will be acceptable. For Canswicki, if it does not trade, it can produce 2 tuna fish cans for 1 baby formula, and if it trades 1 baby formula, then it can get 2.5 cans of tuna fish; hence by trade, Canswicki is better off. For Tunata, if it does not trade, then it can produce 1 baby formula can for 4 tuna fish cans, and if the trade for 1 baby formula, then 2.5 cans of tuna fish to be given up; hence, it is better off by trade.

  2. The terms of trade will not be acceptable. For Canswicki, if it does not trade, it can produce 2 tuna fish cans for 1 baby formula, and if it trades 1 baby formula, then it can get 1 can of tuna fish; hence, it will not trade. They can produce 2 tuna fish cans by giving up 1 baby formula without trade.

  3. The terms of trade will be acceptable. For Tunata, if it does not trade, it can produce 1 baby formula can for 4 tuna fish cans, and if they trade for 1 baby formula, then 5 cans of tuna fish will be given up; hence, it is worse off by trade. They can produce 1 baby formula can by giving 4 cans of tuna fish without trade.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following hypothetical production possibilities tables are for China and the United States. Assume that before specialization and trade the optimal product mix for China is alternative B and for the United States is alternative U.


China Production Alternatives

Product

A

B

C

D

E

F

Apparel (in thousands)

30

24

18

12

6

0

Chemicals (in tons)

0

6

12

18

24

30


U.S. Production Alternatives

Product

R

S

T

U

V

W

Apparel (in thousands)

10

8

6

4

2

0

Chemicals (in tons)

0

4

8

12

16

20

  1. Are comparative-cost conditions such that the two areas should specialize? If so, what product should each produce?

  2. What is the total gain in apparel and chemical output that would result from such specialization?

  3. What are the limits of the terms of trade? Suppose that the actual terms of trade are 1 unit of apparel for 1½ units of chemicals and that 4 units of apparel are exchanged for 6 units of chemicals. What are the gains from specialization and trade for each nation?

Suppose that if Iceland and Japan were both closed economies, the domestic price of fish would be \(100 per ton in Iceland and \)90 per ton in Japan. If the two countries decided to open up to international trade with each other, which of the following could be the equilibrium international price of fish once they begin trading?

a. \(75

b. \)85

c. \(95

d. \)105

Suppose Big Country can produce 80 units of X by using all its resources to produce X or 60 units of Y by devoting all its resources to Y. Comparable figures for Small Nation are 60 units of X and 60 units of Y. Assuming constant costs, in which product should each nation specialize? Explain why. What are the limits of the terms of trade between these two countries?

Why is a quota more detrimental to an economy than a tariff that results in the same level of imports as the quota? What is the net outcome of either tariffs or quota for the world economy?

In Country A, a worker can make 5 bicycles per hour. In Country B, a worker can make 7 bicycles per hour. Which country has an absolute advantage in making bicycles?

  1. Country A

  2. Country B

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free