Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Explain how built-in (automatic) stabilizers work. What are the differences between proportional, progressive, and regressive tax systems as they relate to an economy’s built-in stability?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Automatic stabilizers increase or decrease in quantity with increasing or decreasing spending components to reduce fluctuations and maintain economic stability.

The progressive tax rates are the most stable because they change in the same direction as GDP changes.

Step by step solution

01

Concept of built-in stabilizers

Built-in stabilizers are instruments of fiscal policy which act on their own to maintain the smooth running of the economy.Built-in stabilizers do not require any external push. These include components like taxes and transfer payments. These stabilizers reduce the multiplier effect, and hence, the impact on the final GDP is less than a situation with no stabilizers.

During an economic boom, an increase in any of the aggregate expenditure components results in multiple increases in the real GDP than the initial push. The multiplier does the work.However, the automatic stabilizers suck some amount of money from the economic system and reduce the multiplier effect.

During an economic crisis, the built-in stabilizers reduce the multiplier effect of a small decline in any aggregate expenditure components by injecting the money into the economy, reducing the effect of the fall in aggregate expenditure.

As an economy’s GDP increases, the quantity of built-in stabilizers increases.The amount of automatic stabilizers refers to the net taxes. Net taxes are the total taxes minus the transfer payments.

02

Tax system in the context of the economic stability

The progressive tax holds a constantly increasing average tax rate with increasing GDP. The proportional tax rate maintains a constant average tax rate with an increase in the GDP. While the regressive tax rate may increase, decrease, or keep constant the average tax rate with change in the GDP.

The progressive tax rate corresponds the best to the changes in the GDP. If GDP increases, the progressive tax rate also increases, thus increasing the average tax rate and vice-versa. Therefore, a progressive tax system provides the best stabilizing effect in the economy compared to the other two tax systems.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is the relationship between the multiplier and the AD component of government spending?

In January, the interest rate is 5 percent and firms borrow \(50 billion per month for investment projects. In February, the federal government doubles its monthly borrowing from \)25 billion to \(50 billion, driving the interest rate up to 7 percent. As a result, firms cut back their borrowing to only \)30 billion per month. Which of the following is true?

  1. There is no crowding-out effect because the government’s increase in borrowing exceeds firms’ decrease in borrowing.

  2. There is a crowding-out effect of \(20 billion.

  3. There is no crowding-out effect because both the government and firms are still borrowing a lot.

  4. There is a crowding-out effect of \)25 billion.

What is the role of the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) as it relates to fiscal policy? Use an Internet search to find the names and university affiliations of the present members of the CEA.

(For students who were assigned Chapter 11) Assume that, without taxes, the consumption schedule for an economy is as shown below:

GDP, Billions

Consumption, Billions
\(100120
200200
300280
400360
500440
600520
700600
  1. Graph this consumption schedule. What is the size of the MPC?

  2. Assume that a lump-sum (regressive) tax of \)10 billion is imposed at all levels of GDP. Calculate the tax rate at each level of GDP. Graph the resulting consumption schedule and compare the MPC and the multiplier with those of the pretax consumption schedule.

  3. Now suppose a proportional tax with a 10 percent tax rate is imposed instead of the regressive tax. Calculate and graph the new consumption schedule, and calculate the MPC and the multiplier.

  4. Finally, impose a progressive tax such that the tax rate is 0 percent when GDP is \(100, 5 percent at \)200, 10 percent at \(300, 15 percent at \)400, and so forth. Determine and graph the new consumption schedule, noting the effect of this tax system on the MPC and the multiplier.

  5. Use a graph similar to Figure 13.3 to show why proportional and progressive taxes contribute to greater economic stability, while a regressive tax does not.

What happens to the taxation and government spending rates during an expansionary fiscal policy?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free