Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Explain how built-in (automatic) stabilizers work. What are the differences between proportional, progressive, and regressive tax systems as they relate to an economy’s built-in stability?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Automatic stabilizers increase or decrease in quantity with increasing or decreasing spending components to reduce fluctuations and maintain economic stability.

The progressive tax rates are the most stable because they change in the same direction as GDP changes.

Step by step solution

01

Concept of built-in stabilizers

Built-in stabilizers are instruments of fiscal policy which act on their own to maintain the smooth running of the economy.Built-in stabilizers do not require any external push. These include components like taxes and transfer payments. These stabilizers reduce the multiplier effect, and hence, the impact on the final GDP is less than a situation with no stabilizers.

During an economic boom, an increase in any of the aggregate expenditure components results in multiple increases in the real GDP than the initial push. The multiplier does the work.However, the automatic stabilizers suck some amount of money from the economic system and reduce the multiplier effect.

During an economic crisis, the built-in stabilizers reduce the multiplier effect of a small decline in any aggregate expenditure components by injecting the money into the economy, reducing the effect of the fall in aggregate expenditure.

As an economy’s GDP increases, the quantity of built-in stabilizers increases.The amount of automatic stabilizers refers to the net taxes. Net taxes are the total taxes minus the transfer payments.

02

Tax system in the context of the economic stability

The progressive tax holds a constantly increasing average tax rate with increasing GDP. The proportional tax rate maintains a constant average tax rate with an increase in the GDP. While the regressive tax rate may increase, decrease, or keep constant the average tax rate with change in the GDP.

The progressive tax rate corresponds the best to the changes in the GDP. If GDP increases, the progressive tax rate also increases, thus increasing the average tax rate and vice-versa. Therefore, a progressive tax system provides the best stabilizing effect in the economy compared to the other two tax systems.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What do economists mean when they say Social Security and Medicare are “pay-as-you-go” plans? What are the Social Security and Medicare trust funds, and how long will they have money left in them? What is the key long-run problem of both Social Security and Medicare? To fix the problem, do you favor increasing taxes or do you prefer reducing benefits?

How do economists distinguish between the absolute and relative sizes of the public debt? Why is the distinction important? Distinguish between refinancing the debt and retiring the debt. How does an internally held public debt differ from an externally held public debt? Contrast the effects of retiring an internally held debt and retiring an externally held debt.

What happens to the taxation and government spending rates during an expansionary fiscal policy?

In January, the interest rate is 5 percent and firms borrow \(50 billion per month for investment projects. In February, the federal government doubles its monthly borrowing from \)25 billion to \(50 billion, driving the interest rate up to 7 percent. As a result, firms cut back their borrowing to only \)30 billion per month. Which of the following is true?

  1. There is no crowding-out effect because the government’s increase in borrowing exceeds firms’ decrease in borrowing.

  2. There is a crowding-out effect of \(20 billion.

  3. There is no crowding-out effect because both the government and firms are still borrowing a lot.

  4. There is a crowding-out effect of \)25 billion.

Refer back to the table in Figure 12.7 in the previous chapter. Suppose that aggregate demand increases such that the amount of real output demanded rises by \(7 billion at each price level. By what percentage will the price level increase? Will this inflation be demand-pull inflation, or will it be cost-push inflation? If potential real GDP (that is, full-employment GDP) is \)510 billion, what will be the size of the positive GDP gap after the change in aggregate demand? If government wants to use fiscal policy to counter the resulting inflation without changing tax rates, would it increase government spending or decrease it?

Real Output Demanded (Billions)
Price Level (Index Number)

Real Output Supplied (Billions)
\(506
108\)513
508104512
510100510
51296507
51492502
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free