Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Refer back to the table in Figure 12.7 in the previous chapter. Suppose that aggregate demand increases such that the amount of real output demanded rises by \(7 billion at each price level. By what percentage will the price level increase? Will this inflation be demand-pull inflation, or will it be cost-push inflation? If potential real GDP (that is, full-employment GDP) is \)510 billion, what will be the size of the positive GDP gap after the change in aggregate demand? If government wants to use fiscal policy to counter the resulting inflation without changing tax rates, would it increase government spending or decrease it?

Real Output Demanded (Billions)
Price Level (Index Number)

Real Output Supplied (Billions)
\(506
108\)513
508104512
510100510
51296507
51492502

Short Answer

Expert verified

The price level increased by 8%.

It is demand-pull inflation.

The positive GDP gap is $3 billion.

The government spending will decrease.

Step by step solution

01

Increase in price level and type of inflation caused by the increase in the price level

The real output demanded and supplied equate with each other at $510 billion. So, the equilibrium GDP is $510 billion, and the equilibrium price level is 100.

An increase of $7 billion in real output demanded at each level will shift the real output demand schedule in the following manner:

Real Output Demanded (Billions)
New Real Output Demanded (Billions)
Price Level (Index Number)

Real Output Supplied (Billions)
$506
$513
108$513
508515104512
510517100510
51251996507
51452192502

Since the new real output demanded equals the real output supplied at $513 billion, the new equilibrium real GDP is $513 billion. The new equilibrium price level is 108.

The percentage increase in price level is as follows:

Increaseinpricelevel=108-100100×100=8%

Therefore, the price level increased by 8%.

The price level increased due to an increase in real output demanded, which results from demand-pull inflation.

02

Positive GDP gap

The GDP gap is the result of deviation in actual GDP from potential GDP and can be calculated in the following manner:

GDP gap = Actual GDP – Potential GDP

Since actual GDP is $513 billion, and potential GDP is $510 billion, the GDP gap is as follows:

GDP gap = ($513 - $510) billion

GDP gap = $3 billion

Therefore, the positive GDP gap resulting from the increase in aggregate demand is $3 billion.

03

Change in government spending to control the inflation

Contractionary fiscal policy is most effective in controlling demand-pull inflation as it reduces the aggregate expenditure of the economy.A tightened aggregate expenditure reduces the economy’s income, ultimately contracting the aggregate demand. As aggregate demand comes down, the price level falls.

Therefore, demand-pull inflation can be reduced through a contractionary fiscal policy. Since taxes are held constantly, only government spending can be used to apply the contractionary fiscal policy.

Hence, the government will decrease its spending to reduce the demand-pull inflation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How do economists distinguish between the absolute and relative sizes of the public debt? Why is the distinction important? Distinguish between refinancing the debt and retiring the debt. How does an internally held public debt differ from an externally held public debt? Contrast the effects of retiring an internally held debt and retiring an externally held debt.

The economy is in a recession. A congresswoman suggests increasing spending to stimulate aggregate demand and raising taxes simultaneously to pay for the increased spending. Her suggestion to combine higher government expenditures with higher taxes is

  1. the worst possible combination of tax and expenditure changes.

  2. the best possible combination of tax and expenditure changes.

  3. a mediocre and contradictory combination of tax and expenditure changes.

What happens to the taxation and government spending rates during an expansionary fiscal policy?

In January, the interest rate is 5 percent and firms borrow \(50 billion per month for investment projects. In February, the federal government doubles its monthly borrowing from \)25 billion to \(50 billion, driving the interest rate up to 7 percent. As a result, firms cut back their borrowing to only \)30 billion per month. Which of the following is true?

  1. There is no crowding-out effect because the government’s increase in borrowing exceeds firms’ decrease in borrowing.

  2. There is a crowding-out effect of \(20 billion.

  3. There is no crowding-out effect because both the government and firms are still borrowing a lot.

  4. There is a crowding-out effect of \)25 billion.

Trace the cause-and-effect chain through which financing and refinancing of the public debt might affect real interest rates, private investment, the capital stock, and economic growth. How might investment in public capital and public-private complementarities alter the outcome of the cause-effect chain?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free