Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Relate each of the following to the 1995–2010 increase in the trend rate of productivity growth:

a. information technology

b. increasing returns

c. network effects

d. global competition

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. Information technology: The development of personal computers, the internet, wireless technology, fiber optic cable has increased the average productivity of workers from 1995 to 2010. The quality of human resources increased, which increased productivity growth.
  2. Increasing returns: Because of network effects and more specialized inputs (microchips), the rate of returns increased from 1995 to 2010, which promoted economic growth in this period.
  3. Network effects: The invention of the internet created a huge network effect for many of the products. It increased the quality of output in the economy. An increase in the quality of output promotes economic growth.
  4. Global competition: Many economies opened to the world between the years 1995 and 2010. It increased the global competition between firms, and the firms increased their efficiency factor.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Reason behind (a)

Information technology: Information technology has enhanced the productivity of workers through personal computers and the internet. It enabled many entrepreneurs to set up businesses from home and connect with their customers virtually.It increased workers' productivity levels from many sectors such as commerce, entertainment, travel & tourism, fashion, and many more.The output per hour of the economy increased between the periods of 1995-2010.

Thus, one can conclude that information technology increased workers' productivity level, which promoted economic growth.

02

Step 2. Reason behind (b)

Increasing returns:The invention of microchips decreased per unit cost in the manufacturing and service sectors.The development of the internet benefitted many entrepreneurs in lowering per-unit costs through network effects. Because of the development of specialized inputs like microchips and network effects, the entrepreneurs enjoyed increasing returns between the years 1995-2010.

The increasing returns from 1995-2010 promoted economic growth.

03

Step 3. Reason behind (c)

Network effects:Network effect refers to the phenomena under which the value of output for users increases with more users.Many entrepreneurs enjoyed the network effect in business after the invention of social media and e-commerce platforms between 1995-2010 because of the internet. It increased the quality of output in the economy.

An increase in the quality of output promoted economic growth for this period.

04

Step 4. Reason behind (d)

Global competition: In the years between 1995 and 2010, many countries opened countries for the global.Many countries that followed restricted market policies lifted their restrictions to gain the benefits of the global market.The competition between firms in the global market increased. To compete and survive in the global market, firms increased their efficiency level, which increased the efficiency factor of the economy.

An increase in the efficiency factor of the economy promotes economic growth. In this way, global competition paved economic growth from 1995 to 2010.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Why are some countries today much poorer than other countries? Are today’s poor countries destined to always be poorer than today’s rich countries? If so, explain why. If not, explain how today’s poor countries can catch up to or even pass today’s rich countries.

Identify each of the following situations as something that either promotes growth or retards growth.

a. Increasing corruption allows government officials to steal people’s homes.

b. A nation introduces patent laws for the first time.

c. A court order shuts down all banks permanently.

d. A poor country extends free public schooling from 8 years to 12 years.

e. A nation adopts a free-trade policy.

f. A formerly communist country adopts free markets.

When and where did modern economic growth first happen? What are the major institutional factors that form the foundation for modern economic growth? What do they have in common?

In 1820, living standards in various places around the globe were _______ they are today.

a. more widely varying than

b. just as widely varying as

c. less widely varying than

Assume that a leader country has real GDP per capita of \(40,000, whereas a follower country has real GDP per capita of \)20,000. Next, suppose that the growth of real GDP per capita falls to zero percent in the leader country and rises to 7 percent in the follower country. If these rates continue for long periods of time, how many years will it take for the follower country to catch up to the living standard of the leader country?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free