Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What is an efficiency wage? How might payment of an above-market wage reduce shirking by employees and reduce worker turnover? How might efficiency wages contribute to downward wage inflexibility, at least for a time, when aggregate demand declines?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The efficiency wage is set above the market equilibrium wage to incentivize the employee.

The higher wages act as an incentive that keeps the employees employed for a long time and reduces shirking or turnover.

The organizations do not want to reduce the efficiency wages when the AD decreases, creating instability.

Step by step solution

01

Efficiency wage

The efficiency wage refers to the above-market equilibrium wage paid to an employee to encourage him to work and not leave the firm. It can enhance worker productivity so much that the higher wage more than pays for itself.

02

Shirking and employee turnover

As the employee is paid high, he will be working in the company with greater efficiency. The cost of leaving the organization or getting removed from the organization is higher in this case. So, there is a reduction in shirking by employees. Consequently, worker turnover, which is the measurement of the number of workers who leave the organization in a specific period, reduces.

03

Efficiency wage and wage inflexibility

Downward wage inflexibility means the wages cannot be reduced. When the aggregate demand declines and the output shrinks, the organization does not want to cut down the efficiency wages because of the benefits it receives from it. The benefits are in the form of reduced shirking, reduced worker turnover, and reduced supervisory personnel.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Compare and contrast the market monetarist 5-percent target for nominal GDP growth with the older, simpler monetary rule advocated by Milton Friedman.

Assume the following information for a hypothetical economy in year 1: money supply = $400 billion; long-term annual growth of potential GDP = 3 percent; velocity = 4. Assume that the banking system initially has no excess reserves and that the reserve requirement is 10 percent. Also suppose that velocity is constant and that the economy initially is operating at its full-employment real output.

  1. What is the level of nominal GDP in year 1?

  2. Suppose the Fed adheres to a monetary rule through open-market operations. What amount of U.S. securities will it have to sell to, or buy from, banks or the public between years 1 and 2 to meet its monetary rule?

First, imagine that both input prices and output prices are fixed in the economy. What does the aggregate supply curve look like? If AD decreases in this situation, what will happen to equilibrium output and the price level? Next, imagine that input prices are fixed, but output prices are flexible. What does the aggregate supply curve look like? In this case, if AD decreases, what will happen to equilibrium output and the price level? Finally, if both input prices and output prices are fully flexible, what does the aggregate supply curve look like? In this case, if AD decreases, what will happen to equilibrium output and the price level?

If prices are sticky and the number of dollars of gross investment unexpectedly increases, the _________ curve will shift _________.

a. AD; right

b. AD; left

c. AS; right

d. AS; left

Suppose that the money supply and the nominal GDP for a hypothetical economy are \(96 billion and \)336 billion, respectively. What is the velocity of money? How will households and businesses react if the central bank reduces the money supply by $20 billion? By how much will nominal GDP have to fall to restore equilibrium, according to the monetarist perspective?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free