Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

How is it possible for investment spending to increase even in a period in which the real interest rate rises?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Investment decisions are about comparing the marginal cost and marginal benefit. The marginal cost of investment is the interest rate, and the marginal benefit is the expected rate of return.

Other factors that influence investment demand can shift the investment demand curve. If these other factors shift the investment demand curve to the right, at the same time when the real interest rate is rising, investment spending can increase even when the real interest rate increases.

Step by step solution

01

Inverse relationship between investment and real interest rate 

An investment demand curve shows an inverse relationship between investment and real interest rate when other things remain constant. The real interest rate is the cost of investing; higher real interest means a higher cost of investment, which reduces the demand for investment.

For example, if the interest rate increases from 2% to 4%, the investment demand decreases from $200,000 to $100,000.

02

Reasons for the increase in investment along with the hike in real interest rate

Given the real interest and investment relationship, investment can increase with an increase in real interest rate if there are changes in other factors, which shifts the investment demand curve to the right. These reasons could be as follows:

A fall in acquisition costs, operating costs, and business taxes increase the cost and revenue gap, resulting in higher profits. This stimulates investment demand.

Technological change provides a chance to increase productivity and raise higher revenue by increasing the supply. This encourages firms to increase investment spending, and demand for investment increases.

The stock of inventories and planned inventories decide the need for investments. If there’s a lack of inventories in stock and firms need to increase their output, they will invest in new capital in spite of the high real interest rate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use your completed table for problem 1 to solve this problem. Suppose the wealth effect is such that \(10 changes in wealth produce \)1 changes in consumption at each income level. If real estate prices tumble such that wealth declines by \(80, what will be the new level of consumption and saving at the \)340 billion level of disposable income? The new level of saving?

Level of Output and Income (GDP = DI)
Consumption
Saving
APC
APS
MPC
MPS
\(240
\)244
-$4
1.016
-0.016
0.8
0.2
2602600100.8
0.2
28027640.985
0.014
0.8
0.2
30029280.9730.0260.8
0.2
320308120.962
0.037
0.8
0.2
340324160.9520.0470.8
0.2
360340200.944
0.055
0.8
0.2
380356240.9360.0630.8
0.2
400372280.930.070.80.2

True or False. Larger MPCs imply larger multipliers.

Is the relationship between changes in spending and changes in real GDP in the multiplier effect a direct (positive) relationship, or is it an inverse (negative) relationship? How does the size of the multiplier relate to the size of the MPC? The MPS? What is the logic of the multiplier-MPC relationship?

In year 1, Adam earns \(1,000 and saves \)100. In year 2, Adam gets a \(500 raise so that he earns a total of \)1,500. Out of that \(1,500, he saves \)200. What is Adam’s MPC out of his $500 raise?

  1. 0.50

  2. 0.75

  3. 0.80

  4. 1.00

Suppose that an initial \(10 billion increase in investment spending expands GDP by \)10 billion in the first round of the multiplier process. If GDP and consumption both rise by \(6 billion in the second round of the process, what is the MPC in this economy? What is the size of the multiplier? If, instead, GDP and consumption both rose by \)8 billion in the second round, what would have been the size of the multiplier?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free