Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Why will a reduction in the real interest rate increase investment spending, other things equal?

Short Answer

Expert verified

A decline in the real interest rate means a decrease in the cost of investment. Thus, the investment spending increases due to lower costs.

Step by step solution

01

Meaning of investment demand

Investment demand is the demand for money/financial resources to fund the business activities like buying capital goods. The investment demand depends on the real interest rate, which is the cost of investment, and the expected profit rate, which is the investment return.

02

Inverse relationship between real interest rate and investment

As the real interest rate decreases, the cost of investment decreases. A lower cost encourages firms to demand more money for investment purposes and increase their production level. This would raise their expected return on investment. A higher expected rate of return stimulates the investment demand in the economy.

The investment demand is negatively sloped, as shown in the graph below:

When the real interest rate declines, the increasing investment is shown by the negatively sloped investment demand curve, ID0. Therefore, a decrease in the real interest rate increases investment spending, ceteris paribus.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that disposable income, consumption, and saving in some country are \(200 billion, \)150 billion, and \(50 billion, respectively. Next, assume that disposable income increases by \)20 billion, consumption rises by \(18 billion, and saving goes up by \)2 billion. What is the economyโ€™s MPC? Its MPS? What was the APC before the increase in disposable income? After the increase?

Suppose that an initial \(10 billion increase in investment spending expands GDP by \)10 billion in the first round of the multiplier process. If GDP and consumption both rise by \(6 billion in the second round of the process, what is the MPC in this economy? What is the size of the multiplier? If, instead, GDP and consumption both rose by \)8 billion in the second round, what would have been the size of the multiplier?

In what direction will each of the following occurrences shift the investment demand curve, other things equal?

  1. An increase in unused production capacity occurs.

  2. Business taxes decline.

  3. The cost of acquiring equipment falls.

  4. Widespread pessimism arises about future business conditions and sales revenues.

  5. A major new technological breakthrough creates prospects for a wide range of profitable new products.

What is the central economic idea humorously illustrated in the Last Word โ€œTopplingDominoesโ€? How does the central idea relate to economic recessions, on the one hand, and vigorous economic expansions, on the other?

Precisely how do the MPC and the APC differ? How does the MPC differ from the MPS? Why must the sum of the MPC and the MPS equal 1?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free