Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Why does a downshift of the consumption schedule typically involve an equal upshift of the saving schedule? What is the exception to this relationship?

Short Answer

Expert verified

As consumption decreases, the proportion of disposable income saved increases, and thus the saving schedule shifts upwards, equal to the downward shift in consumption schedule.

The exception to the equal and opposite movement of consumption and saving schedules occurs because of taxes.

Step by step solution

01

Equal and opposite shifts in consumption and saving schedule

The macroeconomic relationship between income, consumption, and savings says that the total income is split into two parts, consumption and saving.All the proportion of income that is not consumed is saved.

Y = C + S

Also, consumption is directly related to income.As income increases, consumption and savings both increase.

Nevertheless, consumption and savings are inversely related to each other. An increase in consumption results in a decrease in savings if the income is constant, and vice-versa. Therefore, the consumption and saving schedule shifts equally in the opposite direction.

02

Reason for exception

Personal taxes affect the consumption and saving habits of people. Higher taxes mean lower disposable income, resulting in lower consumption and savings. Thus, the consumption and savings move in the same direction, which is the opposite of the change in taxes.

Thus, an increase (decrease) in taxes reduces (increases) the consumption and saving of individuals, which creates an exception to the equal and opposite movement of consumption and saving schedules.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Is the relationship between changes in spending and changes in real GDP in the multiplier effect a direct (positive) relationship, or is it an inverse (negative) relationship? How does the size of the multiplier relate to the size of the MPC? The MPS? What is the logic of the multiplier-MPC relationship?

Linear equations for the consumption and saving schedules take the general form C = a + bY and S = โˆ’ a + (1 โˆ’ b)Y, where C, S, and Y are consumption, saving, and national income, respectively. The constant a represents the vertical intercept, and b represents the slope of the consumption schedule.

a. Use the following data to substitute numerical values for a and b in the consumption and saving equations.

National Income (Y)Consumption (C)
\(080
100140
200200
300260
400320

b. What is the economic meaning of b? Of (1 โˆ’ b)?

c. Suppose that the amount of saving that occurs at each level of national income falls by \)20 but that the values of b and (1 โˆ’ b) remain unchanged. Restate the saving and consumption equations inserting the new numerical values, and cite a factor that might have caused the change.

Use your completed table for problem 1 to solve this problem. Suppose the wealth effect is such that \(10 changes in wealth produce \)1 changes in consumption at each income level. If real estate prices tumble such that wealth declines by \(80, what will be the new level of consumption and saving at the \)340 billion level of disposable income? The new level of saving?

Level of Output and Income (GDP = DI)
Consumption
Saving
APC
APS
MPC
MPS
\(240
\)244
-$4
1.016
-0.016
0.8
0.2
2602600100.8
0.2
28027640.985
0.014
0.8
0.2
30029280.9730.0260.8
0.2
320308120.962
0.037
0.8
0.2
340324160.9520.0470.8
0.2
360340200.944
0.055
0.8
0.2
380356240.9360.0630.8
0.2
400372280.930.070.80.2

What is the central economic idea humorously illustrated in the Last Word โ€œTopplingDominoesโ€? How does the central idea relate to economic recessions, on the one hand, and vigorous economic expansions, on the other?

If a \(50 billion initial increase in spending leads to a \)250 billion change in real GDP, how big is the multiplier?

  1. 1.0

  2. 2.5

  3. 4.0

  4. 5.0

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free