Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Why is there a trade-off between the amount of consumption that people can enjoy today and the amount of consumption that they can enjoy in the future? Why can’t people enjoy more of both? How does saving relate to investment and thus to economic growth? What role do banks and other financial institutions play in aiding the economic growth process?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Consuming less today and saving the rest of the income will help in increasing future consumption. In this way, society trades off between current and future consumption.

A part of current consumption is a trade-off with future consumption. If the society chooses to enjoy the whole of current consumption, there will be no increase in future consumption.

Savings are required to fund the economic investments in the economy. These economic investments increase the production capacity of the economy, which in turn leads to economic growth.

Banks and financial institutions borrow the savings from the households and lend them to the investors. These investors use the savings for economic investments in the economy, which aid the economic growth process.

Step by step solution

01

Trade-off between current consumption and future consumption

Savings occur when there is a difference between the current income and consumption by the households. These savings are directed to fund the economic investments, which increase the productive capacity of the economy in the future through research & developments and more efficient capital goods.

The increased production capacity increases the output per person, which will increase the future consumption of the households. Thus, a part of current consumption is forgone in the form of savings to finance the growth in the future through economic investments. In this way, society trades off between present and future consumption.

02

Reason why it is not possible to enjoy more of current and future consumption

Economic investments require funds for the research and development of more efficient capital. If society consumes all of the current income, there will be no funds available for economic investments. Thus, the economy will not increase its productivity level in the future.

Since the savings made by households from current income are utilized for economic investments, it is impossible for society to experience the whole of current and future consumption.

03

Role of banks and financial institutions

Banks and financial institutions help direct the savings from the households to the investors to utilize for economic investment. Households deposit their savings to the banks and financial institutions upon which they earn interest.

The banks lend the savings to the businesses and investors on higher interest rates. Investors use this money for the development of advanced technologies and the production of more efficient capital goods. In this way, banks and other financial institutions contribute to economic growth.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Why do many firms strive to maintain stable prices?

A mathematical approximation called the rule of 70 tells us how long it

will take for something to double in size if it grows at a constant rate. The

doubling time is approximately equal to the number 70 divided by the percentage

rate of growth. Thus, if Panama’s real GDP per person is growing at 7 percent per

year, it will take about 10 years (= 70/7) to double. Apply the rule of 70 to solve the

following problem: Real GDP per person in Panama in 2017 was about \(15,000

per person, while it was about \)60,000 per person in the United States. If real GDP

per person in Panama grows at the rate of 5 percent per year, about how long will ittake Panama’s real GDP per person to reach the level that the United States was

at in 2017? (Hint: How many times would Panama’s 2017 real GDP per person

have to double to reach the United States’ 2017 real GDP per person?)

If an economy has sticky prices and demand unexpectedly increases, you would expect the economy’s real GDP to

  1. increase.

  2. decrease.

  3. remain the same.

Suppose that the annual rates of growth of real GDP in Econoland over a five-year period were sequentially as follows: 3 percent, 1 percent, −2 percent, 4 percent, and 5 percent. What was the average of these growth rates in Econoland over these five years? What term would economists use to describe what happened in year 3? If the growth rate in year 3 had been a positive 2 percent rather than a negative 2 percent, what would have been Econoland’s average growth rate over the five years?

If the demand for a firm’s output unexpectedly decreases, you would expect its inventory to

a. increase.

b. decrease.

c. remain the same.

d. increase or remain the same, depending on whether or not prices are sticky.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free