Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A mathematical approximation called the rule of 70 tells us how long it

will take for something to double in size if it grows at a constant rate. The

doubling time is approximately equal to the number 70 divided by the percentage

rate of growth. Thus, if Panama’s real GDP per person is growing at 7 percent per

year, it will take about 10 years (= 70/7) to double. Apply the rule of 70 to solve the

following problem: Real GDP per person in Panama in 2017 was about \(15,000

per person, while it was about \)60,000 per person in the United States. If real GDP

per person in Panama grows at the rate of 5 percent per year, about how long will ittake Panama’s real GDP per person to reach the level that the United States was

at in 2017? (Hint: How many times would Panama’s 2017 real GDP per person

have to double to reach the United States’ 2017 real GDP per person?)

Short Answer

Expert verified

Panama’s real GDP per person will take 28 years to reach the United States’ level in

2017.

Step by step solution

01

Number of times Panama’s GDP per person should double to reach thelevel of US’s GDP

The GDP per person in the US is $60,000 and that in Panama is $15,000.

GDPUSGDPPanama=60,00015,000GDPUS=4×GDPPanama

The GDP per person in the US is four times that in Panama.

The GDP per person in Panama will double to $30,000 in the first phase, and the GDP per person will reach $60,000 in the second phase.

Therefore, the GDP per person in Panama will have to double twice to reach the United States’ 2017 real GDP per person.

02

Time taken to double Panama’s GDP per person (to reach $60,000)

According to the rule of 70, the doubling rate of GDP per person in Panama will be as follows:

DoublingRate=705=14

Thus, the GDP per person in Panama doubles every 14 years.

So to reach $60,000, the GDP per person in Panama will take (14 × 2)= 28 years.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Catalog companies are committed to selling at the prices printed in their catalogs. If a catalog company finds its inventory of sweaters rising, what does that tell you about the demand for sweaters? Was it unexpectedly high, unexpectedly low, or as expected? If the company could change the price of sweaters, would it raise the price, lower the price, or keep the price the same? Given that the company cannot change the price of sweaters, however, consider the number of sweaters it orders each month from the company that manufactures the sweaters. If inventories become very high, will the catalog company increase orders, decrease orders, or keep orders the same? Given what the catalog company does with its orders, what is likely to happen to employment and output at the sweater manufacturer?

Why do many firms strive to maintain stable prices?

If an economy has sticky prices and demand unexpectedly increases, you would expect the economy’s real GDP to

  1. increase.

  2. decrease.

  3. remain the same.

Why is there a trade-off between the amount of consumption that people can enjoy today and the amount of consumption that they can enjoy in the future? Why can’t people enjoy more of both? How does saving relate to investment and thus to economic growth? What role do banks and other financial institutions play in aiding the economic growth process?

Why do you think macroeconomists focus on just a few key statistics when trying to understand the health and trajectory of an economy? Would it be better to try to examine all possible data? Why or why not?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free