Question

Neither free trade nor prohibited trade comes with benefits only. Both come with benefits and costs. Therefore, free trade is no better or worse than prohibited trade. Comment.

Short answer

It's not accurate to state universally that free trade is 'no better or worse' than prohibited trade. The impacts of these policies are nuanced and context-dependent, involving several economic and social trade-offs.

Step-by-step solution

Definition of Terms

Firstly, let's define the terms: Free trade is a policy in which the government does not restrict imports or exports. Prohibited trade, on the other hand, involves restrictions or bans on certain goods or with specific countries.

Benefits of Free Trade

Free trade allows countries to concentrate on producing goods they can make most efficiently. It encourages competition, thereby promoting innovation and productivity. For consumers, it often results in lower prices and a greater variety of goods. However, it can also lead to job losses in industries that can't compete internationally.

Costs of Prohibited Trade

Prohibited trade can protect domestic industries from international competition, which can preserve jobs. It can also be used as a geopolitical tool. However, it can limit the variety and increase the price of goods for consumers. It can also stifle innovation and productivity by reducing competition.

Conclusion

Given these different factors, it is challenging to universally state whether free trade or prohibited trade is 'better'. It depends on several factors, including a country's economic profile, geopolitical situation, and societal values. There are always trade-offs to consider.