Chapter 21: Problem 12
If there is a net loss to society from tariffs, why do tariffs exist?
Chapter 21: Problem 12
If there is a net loss to society from tariffs, why do tariffs exist?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeNeither free trade nor prohibited trade comes with benefits only. Both come with benefits and costs. Therefore, free trade is no better or worse than prohibited trade. Comment.
The desire for profit can end up pushing countries toward producing goods in which they have a comparative advantage. Do you agree or disagree? Explain your answer.
Some economists have argued that, because domestic consumers gain more from free trade than domestic producers gain from (import) tariffs and quotas, consumers should buy out domestic producers and rid themselves of costly tariffs and quotas. For example, if consumers save $$\$ 400$$ million from free trade (through paying lower prices) and producers gain $$\$ 100$$ million from tariffs and quotas, consumers can pay producers something more than $$\$ 100$$ million but less than $$\$ 400$$ million and get producers to favor free trade too. Assuming that this scheme were feasible, what do you think of it?
The desire for profit can end up pushing countries toward producing goods in which they have a comparative advantage. Do you agree or disagree? Explain your answer.
Consider two groups of domestic producers: those which compete with imports and those which export goods. Suppose the domestic producers that compete with imports convince the legislature to impose a high tariff on imports-so high, in fact, that almost all imports are eliminated. Does this policy in any way adversely affect domestic producers that export goods? If so, how?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.