Chapter 6: Problem 11
Use APPLE to verify some of the claims made in Section \(6-3\) . (i) Run the regression ecolbs on ecoprc, regprc and report the results in the usual form, including the \(R\) -squared and adjusted \(R\) -squared. Interpret the coefficients on the price variables and comment on their signs and magnitudes. (ii) Are the price variables statistically significant? Report the \(p\) -values for the individual tests. (iii) What is the range of fitted values for ecolbs? What fraction of the sample reports ecolbs = 0? Comment. (iv) Do you think the price variables together do a good job of explaining variation in ecolbs? Explain. (v) Add the variables faminc, hhsize (household size), educ, and age to the regression from part (i). Find the \(p\) -value for their joint significance. What do you conclude? (vi) Run separate simple regressions of ecolbs on ecoprc and then ecolbs on regpre. How do the simple regression coefficients compare with the multiple regression from part (i)? Find the correlation coefficient between ecoprc and regprc to help explain your findings. (vii) Consider a model that adds family income and the quantity demanded for regular apples: \(e c o l b s=\beta_{0}+\beta_{1} e c o p r c+\beta_{2} r e g p r c+\beta_{3}\) faminc \(+\beta_{4} r e g l b s+u\) From basic economic theory, which explanatory variable does not belong to the equation? When you drop the variables one at a time time, do the sizes of the adjusted \(R\) -squareds affect your answer?
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.