Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Given \(U=(x+2)(y+1)\) and \(P_{x}=4, P_{y}=6,\) and \(B=130\) (a) Write the Lagrangian function. (b) Find the optimal levels of purchase \(x^{*}\) and \(y^{*}\) (c) ts the second-order sufficient condition for maximum satisfied? (d) Does the answer in (b) give any comparative-static information?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) The Lagrangian: \( L = (x+2)(y+1) + \lambda(130 - 4x - 6y) \). (b) \(x^* = 16\), \(y^* = 11\). (c) Yes, the Hessian is negative definite. (d) Yes, it provides comparative-static insights.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction to the Problem

We have a utility function given by \( U = (x+2)(y+1) \) and need to optimize it subject to a budget constraint with prices \( P_x = 4 \) and \( P_y = 6 \) and a budget \( B = 130 \).
02

Write the Lagrangian Function

The Lagrangian function combines the utility function and the budget constraint. It is given by:\[ L(x, y, \lambda) = (x+2)(y+1) + \lambda (130 - 4x - 6y) \]where \(\lambda\) is the Lagrange multiplier representing the shadow price of income.
03

Determine the First-Order Conditions

To find the first-order conditions, take the partial derivatives of the Lagrangian with respect to \(x\), \(y\), and \(\lambda\) and set them equal to zero:\[ \frac{\partial L}{\partial x} = (y+1) - 4\lambda = 0 \] \[ \frac{\partial L}{\partial y} = (x+2) - 6\lambda = 0 \]\[ \frac{\partial L}{\partial \lambda} = 130 - 4x - 6y = 0 \]
04

Solve the Equations

From \( \frac{\partial L}{\partial x} = 0 \), we have \( \lambda = \frac{y+1}{4} \).From \( \frac{\partial L}{\partial y} = 0 \), \( \lambda = \frac{x+2}{6} \).Equating the two expressions for \( \lambda \), \( \frac{y+1}{4} = \frac{x+2}{6} \).Cross multiplying and simplifying gives \( 6(y+1) = 4(x+2) \).Solving: \( 6y + 6 = 4x + 8 \) simplifies to \( 4x = 6y - 2 \). Equation 4: \( x = \frac{3}{2}y - \frac{1}{2} \).Substitute \( x = \frac{3}{2}y - \frac{1}{2} \) into the budget constraint:\[ 4(\frac{3}{2}y - \frac{1}{2}) + 6y = 130 \].Simplifies to:\[ 6y = 132 \], hence \( y = 11 \) and \( x = \frac{3}{2}(11) - \frac{1}{2} = 16 \).
05

Second-Order Sufficient Conditions

The second-order conditions involve checking the determinant of the bordered Hessian matrix of the Lagrangian. We need condition: 1. The bordered Hessian should be negative definite.Calculate the bordered Hessian and evaluate:\[ H = \begin{vmatrix}0 & -4 & -6 \-4 & 0 & 0 \-6 & 0 & 0 \end{vmatrix} \]. Evaluate for negative definiteness ensuring optimal conditions are satisfied.
06

Comparative Static Analysis

Comparative-static analysis looks at how changes in parameters like income or prices affect optimal decisions. Here:- Changes in prices \(P_x\) or \(P_y\) or the budget \(B\) would shift the budget constraint.- Can be analyzed using the Lagrange multiplier \(\lambda\), representing the marginal utility of income in terms of utility gained per additional dollar spent.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Lagrangian Function
In constrained optimization, the Lagrangian function is a key tool. It helps combine an objective function, in this case, the utility function, with constraints, like a budget or any other limitations you work with. The Lagrangian is given by:\[ L(x, y, \lambda) = (x+2)(y+1) + \lambda (130 - 4x - 6y) \]Here, \( \lambda \) is known as the Lagrange multiplier. It plays a critical role by representing the change in the objective function as a result of changes in the constraint.
  • The term \((x+2)(y+1)\) represents the objective function, or utility in this case.
  • The term \( \lambda (130 - 4x - 6y) \) ties the budget restriction to the utility maximization problem.
Understanding how to form the Lagrangian is foundational for solving constrained optimization problems, as it sets up the roadmap for determining optimal decisions.
First-Order Conditions
To locate the optimum, we derive the first-order conditions (FOCs) from the Lagrangian. These conditions are essentially the derivatives of the Lagrangian with respect to each variable, which include the goods \(x\) and \(y\), and the constraint represented by \(\lambda\).For our function, these derivatives are:\[ \frac{\partial L}{\partial x} = (y+1) - 4\lambda = 0 \]\[ \frac{\partial L}{\partial y} = (x+2) - 6\lambda = 0 \]\[ \frac{\partial L}{\partial \lambda} = 130 - 4x - 6y = 0 \]
  • First equation indicates the rate at which utility increases with each unit of \( x \) should counterbalance the reduction in the constraint.
  • Same principle applies for \( y \) in the second equation.
  • The final equation ensures satisfaction of the budget constraint.
Solving these equations simultaneously gives us the optimal values of \(x\), \(y\), and \(\lambda\). These values maintain the balance between maximizing utility and adhering to budget limits.
Second-Order Sufficient Conditions
While first-order conditions identify candidate points for being optimum, the second-order sufficient conditions help confirm whether these points are indeed maxima. These involve checking the properties of the bordered Hessian matrix derived from the Lagrangian:The bordered Hessian is expressed as:\[ H = \begin{vmatrix} 0 & -4 & -6 \ -4 & 0 & 0 \ -6 & 0 & 0 \end{vmatrix} \]
  • The determinant of the bordered Hessian must be negative-definite for a maximum.
  • A negative-definite bounded Hessian implies the identified points not only meet the first-order conditions but are indeed the maxima, ensuring no better value for utility exists without breaching the budget constraint.
Checking these conditions gives assurance that the identified solution is correctly positioned within the constraint boundaries to maximize satisfaction.
Comparative Statics
Comparative statics analyses how changes to constraints or parameters like prices and income influence optimal solutions. Here, the Lagrange multiplier \( \lambda \) serves as a key indicator of changes in optimization due to its ties to the budget constraint.Changes in:
  • Income \( B \) will generally involve shifts in the budget constraint, affecting consumption choices \(x^*\) and \(y^*\).
  • Price changes \(P_x\) or \(P_y\) alter the constraint and potentially the optimal purchase levels.
By evaluating \( \lambda \), students can gain insights into how sensitive the optimal solutions are to changes in budget or prices. It essentially expresses the additional utility obtained from an additional unit of the budget and thus reflects how purchasing power affects the utility function under varying scenarios.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free